Next CNN head to roll?
Comments
-
In the case of my favorite civil servant, this is what I'd expect. You're smarter.TurdBomber said:
Sometimes an unborn baby's gotta get whacked. Sad, but essential fact of life.creepycoug said:
SCOTUS improved a horrible situation and didn’t go far enough. National abortion ban. Doesn’t matter where you live. Very straight forward issue with zero complexity or subtlety. You’ve got dipshits who say I’m just sermonizing and foisting my morality on others when it’s as plain as day that you’re allowing a given state legislature, like WA or OR, to countenance the taking of a human life in circumstances in which we, nobody here or elsewhere, would stand for it. Ever.thechatch said:Maybe it’s because I’m a reasonable person, but something like abortion, where you are quite literally terminating human life, should be somewhat of a restricted procedure.
The lunatics on one side calling for zero term limits and even federal(tax payer) funding to support these services that are many times an action of convenience on the part of those seeking the procedure are matched by those absurd individuals on the far right, who believe it should be 100% outlawed, even in cases of rape or incest, or when the health of the mother is in jeopardy.
IDK about you guys but to me It’s almost as if we are a collection of states with varying cultures and political-religious ideologies, and that a flashpoint issue such as this is best left up to individual states to decide what is best for their constituents.
It seems wildly inappropriate to tell someone in Oklahoma that they should pay for someone in Oregon to have an abortion, just as it seems ludicrous for someone in California to be told by someone in Alabama that they should be forced to keep a pregnancy that is the result of incest.
Why is this so hard for people? The more I think about it, the more I think SCOTUS got it right….I just wish they’d waited until after the election, because their ruling is being distorted by “THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION IN OUR HISTORY” for the 6th time in 15 years.
How on earth does it make sense to leave that one to the states?
I'm not for it, personally, but I'm not telling women what to do with their bodies or lives. It's up to them, their conscience and their maker, should he, she or it exist.
-
So is there an O/U on the next CNN head to roll? Asking for a fren. -
Sounds like you care a lot
My position is limit it to the first trimester. I've said that before. I read a lot of threads in the Tug and yes, you post in some. I don't get wrapped up in it and it's not my life's crusade. It's private matter. Killing a mid or late stage fetus seems abhorrent to me so those should be banned. I don't lose sleep over what strangers do with their bodies. You seem to. -
Don't know, but I'd love to see Tucker on CNN. I think he's at his best when he's firing at all kinds of people, and he does that so well. My only negative take, and it's just a slight negative, is the he can sound a little whinny at times. But it's whatever. Jordan Peterson weird me out sometimes when he's cries and gets all emotional, but I can listen to the guy all day.46XiJCAB said:
So is there an O/U on the next CNN head to roll? Asking for a fren. -
They fired him the first time around. He wanted to do other things besides Crossfire. Idiots.creepycoug said:
Don't know, but I'd love to see Tucker on CNN. I think he's at his best when he's firing at all kinds of people, and he does that so well. My only negative take, and it's just a slight negative, is the he can sound a little whinny at times. But it's whatever. Jordan Peterson weird me out sometimes when he's cries and gets all emotional, but I can listen to the guy all day.46XiJCAB said:
So is there an O/U on the next CNN head to roll? Asking for a fren. -
Well of course I care a lot. That's dumb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Sounds like you care a lot
My position is limit it to the first trimester. I've said that before. I read a lot of threads in the Tug and yes, you post in some. I don't get wrapped up in it and it's not my life's crusade. It's private matter. Killing a mid or late stage fetus seems abhorrent to me so those should be banned. I don't lose sleep over what strangers do with their bodies. You seem to.
So, "her body, her choice". And limit to first trimester because ... I don't know, seems like a good spot. Even though we're talking about infanticide here.
Got it. As I said, you got nothing. -
Acosta just got the dreaded vote of confidence from upper management. He gone.
-
I would have said Dana Bash but she seems to have gotten the memo and obviously wants to keep her job. Alisyn Camerota.
-
Tucker would be hated at CNN by everyone except for any staff he brought over. Tucker at least can sort of stand Hannity and they can cross chat and have Tucker lead the audience into Hannity's show. Tucker can work with the other Fox reporters like Bill Melugin on the border. CNN has no national conservative infrastructure to support a conservative. Tucker spends a lot of time trashing the CNN and MSLSD reporters and commentators. Tucker's working environment would be hell at CNN. As it is he just has to tolerate Hannity or Brett Baier and just had to avoid Chrissie Wallace. Can't see a CNN executive calling in Tucker and giving him a schedule of CNN morons they want him to prop up. No CNN streaming service like Tucker's show on Fox's subscription service.creepycoug said:
Don't know, but I'd love to see Tucker on CNN. I think he's at his best when he's firing at all kinds of people, and he does that so well. My only negative take, and it's just a slight negative, is the he can sound a little whinny at times. But it's whatever. Jordan Peterson weird me out sometimes when he's cries and gets all emotional, but I can listen to the guy all day.46XiJCAB said:
So is there an O/U on the next CNN head to roll? Asking for a fren. -
I stopped watching Hannity long ago. I have a thing about listening to broken records. I don't. Same with Laura, just can't watch her show anymore.
