Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Next CNN head to roll?
Comments
-
I'll get you over the fence on this one eventually Pawz. And when the time comes, you will meet your maker with a clear conscience, knowing you were on the right side of the most profound moral issue of our time. And you will not need to thank me, because we're friends.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog -
Dude, I'm literally praying for your soul. You can't possibly mean this. I used to be like you. Give it some thought.Pitchfork51 said:
What is this boomer nonsense you're spouting. When I knock up a chick she better flush that thing outWestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
And every fucking hood rat on welfare needs to do so as well -
Maybe it’s because I’m a reasonable person, but something like abortion, where you are quite literally terminating human life, should be somewhat of a restricted procedure.
The lunatics on one side calling for zero term limits and even federal(tax payer) funding to support these services that are many times an action of convenience on the part of those seeking the procedure are matched by those absurd individuals on the far right, who believe it should be 100% outlawed, even in cases of rape or incest, or when the health of the mother is in jeopardy.
IDK about you guys but to me It’s almost as if we are a collection of states with varying cultures and political-religious ideologies, and that a flashpoint issue such as this is best left up to individual states to decide what is best for their constituents.
It seems wildly inappropriate to tell someone in Oklahoma that they should pay for someone in Oregon to have an abortion, just as it seems ludicrous for someone in California to be told by someone in Alabama that they should be forced to keep a pregnancy that is the result of incest.
Why is this so hard for people? The more I think about it, the more I think SCOTUS got it right….I just wish they’d waited until after the election, because their ruling is being distorted by “THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION IN OUR HISTORY” for the 6th time in 15 years. -
if we are bashing trailer parks - I'm Outcreepycoug said:
Lolz. A trailer park assessment of the issue. Par for Bill I guess.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Thinking this carpet bagger (for 15 or 20 years) clown is some kind of a moral authority on abortion is laughable. Nobody can agree on the definition of life. Most European countries don't allow it after 15 weeks. That's reasonable.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog
I have thoughts while I’m napping that are more profound than what Bill could ever assimilate with Plato as his tutor.
#butbutbuttheeuropeans! -
Same lame shtick from you as alwayscreepycoug said:
Lolz. A trailer park assessment of the issue. Par for Bill I guess.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Thinking this carpet bagger (for 15 or 20 years) clown is some kind of a moral authority on abortion is laughable. Nobody can agree on the definition of life. Most European countries don't allow it after 15 weeks. That's reasonable.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog
I have thoughts while I’m napping that are more profound than what Bill could ever assimilate with Plato as his tutor.
#butbutbuttheeuropeans!
"You're stupid!"
Please, tell us how handsome and successful you are again. It's definitely not a sign of insecurity.
-
Very very handsome and fairly successful.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Same lame shtick from you as alwayscreepycoug said:
Lolz. A trailer park assessment of the issue. Par for Bill I guess.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Thinking this carpet bagger (for 15 or 20 years) clown is some kind of a moral authority on abortion is laughable. Nobody can agree on the definition of life. Most European countries don't allow it after 15 weeks. That's reasonable.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog
I have thoughts while I’m napping that are more profound than what Bill could ever assimilate with Plato as his tutor.
#butbutbuttheeuropeans!
"You're stupid!"
Please, tell us how handsome and successful you are again. It's definitely not a sign of insecurity.
Pay attention dummy.
It’s really too bad that either you are as stupid as you sound or can’t take this issue seriously and come back with a thoughtful response. Perhaps you agree with me. If so, would that be so terrible? JFC … get over your obsession with my schtick. -
SCOTUS improved a horrible situation and didn’t go far enough. National abortion ban. Doesn’t matter where you live. Very straight forward issue with zero complexity or subtlety. You’ve got dipshits who say I’m just sermonizing and foisting my morality on others when it’s as plain as day that you’re allowing a given state legislature, like WA or OR, to countenance the taking of a human life in circumstances in which we, nobody here or elsewhere, would stand for it. Ever.thechatch said:Maybe it’s because I’m a reasonable person, but something like abortion, where you are quite literally terminating human life, should be somewhat of a restricted procedure.
The lunatics on one side calling for zero term limits and even federal(tax payer) funding to support these services that are many times an action of convenience on the part of those seeking the procedure are matched by those absurd individuals on the far right, who believe it should be 100% outlawed, even in cases of rape or incest, or when the health of the mother is in jeopardy.
IDK about you guys but to me It’s almost as if we are a collection of states with varying cultures and political-religious ideologies, and that a flashpoint issue such as this is best left up to individual states to decide what is best for their constituents.
It seems wildly inappropriate to tell someone in Oklahoma that they should pay for someone in Oregon to have an abortion, just as it seems ludicrous for someone in California to be told by someone in Alabama that they should be forced to keep a pregnancy that is the result of incest.
Why is this so hard for people? The more I think about it, the more I think SCOTUS got it right….I just wish they’d waited until after the election, because their ruling is being distorted by “THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION IN OUR HISTORY” for the 6th time in 15 years.
How on earth does it make sense to leave that one to the states? -
I already am. I don't want a single nuclear warhead to be discharged - let alone the rest of them.creepycoug said:
I'll get you over the fence on this one eventually Pawz. And when the time comes, you will meet your maker with a clear conscience, knowing you were on the right side of the most profound moral issue of our time. And you will not need to thank me, because we're friends.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog
-
I don't vote on abortion. That's what low info emotional types and psychos like you do, along with the fundies and leftist chicks who nobody wants to fuck. You're obsessed with it, and you're not interested in a real discussion, just some four minute internet conversion and making more flailing attempts to prove how great you are.creepycoug said:
Very very handsome and fairly successful.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Same lame shtick from you as alwayscreepycoug said:
Lolz. A trailer park assessment of the issue. Par for Bill I guess.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Thinking this carpet bagger (for 15 or 20 years) clown is some kind of a moral authority on abortion is laughable. Nobody can agree on the definition of life. Most European countries don't allow it after 15 weeks. That's reasonable.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog
I have thoughts while I’m napping that are more profound than what Bill could ever assimilate with Plato as his tutor.
#butbutbuttheeuropeans!
"You're stupid!"
Please, tell us how handsome and successful you are again. It's definitely not a sign of insecurity.
Pay attention dummy.
It’s really too bad that either you are as stupid as you sound or can’t take this issue seriously and come back with a thoughtful response. Perhaps you agree with me. If so, would that be so terrible? JFC … get over your obsession with my schtick. -
That is entirely bullshit. Nothing at all emotional about my take. What a crock of shit and par for the course for a shit brain loud mouth like you. You’re just saying that because you know “emotional” plays well in the tug. As for low information, how about you put your money where your big mouth is and serve up. Because I’ve said plenty and you’ve yet to step in, other than your nothing sandwich “let’s be reasonable”. This isn’t schtick; this is you talking out of your asshole and me calling you out on it.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I don't vote on abortion. That's what low info emotional types and psychos like you do, along with the fundies and leftist chicks who nobody wants to fuck. You're obsessed with it, and you're not interested in a real discussion, just some four minute internet conversion and making more flailing attempts to prove how great you are.creepycoug said:
Very very handsome and fairly successful.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Same lame shtick from you as alwayscreepycoug said:
Lolz. A trailer park assessment of the issue. Par for Bill I guess.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Thinking this carpet bagger (for 15 or 20 years) clown is some kind of a moral authority on abortion is laughable. Nobody can agree on the definition of life. Most European countries don't allow it after 15 weeks. That's reasonable.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog
I have thoughts while I’m napping that are more profound than what Bill could ever assimilate with Plato as his tutor.
#butbutbuttheeuropeans!
"You're stupid!"
Please, tell us how handsome and successful you are again. It's definitely not a sign of insecurity.
Pay attention dummy.
It’s really too bad that either you are as stupid as you sound or can’t take this issue seriously and come back with a thoughtful response. Perhaps you agree with me. If so, would that be so terrible? JFC … get over your obsession with my schtick.
So go ahead shit mouth. Take a position, back it up, and you’ll get a no schtick response from me. Don't blame me because you have no game. You said you read my posts, so I’m assuming you’re ready with something.
I'm pretty sure I know what's coming.
