Next CNN head to roll?
Comments
-
Five.46XiJCAB said:
So is there an O/U on the next CNN head to roll? Asking for a fren. -
I never watched Hannity. He is a NeverEnding War republican but did support Trump early. Hannity did a great job along with Levin on Russiagate. But it like his nose is stuck in Lindsey Graham's ass. Graham lives on Hannity and would never show up on Tucker and take it like a man.46XiJCAB said:I stopped watching Hannity long ago. I have a thing about listening to broken records. I don't. Same with Laura, just can't watch her show anymore.
-
Where did CC say "you're stupid?" His approach seemed to be very heartfelt.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Same lame shtick from you as alwayscreepycoug said:
Lolz. A trailer park assessment of the issue. Par for Bill I guess.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Thinking this carpet bagger (for 15 or 20 years) clown is some kind of a moral authority on abortion is laughable. Nobody can agree on the definition of life. Most European countries don't allow it after 15 weeks. That's reasonable.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog
I have thoughts while I’m napping that are more profound than what Bill could ever assimilate with Plato as his tutor.
#butbutbuttheeuropeans!
"You're stupid!"
Please, tell us how handsome and successful you are again. It's definitely not a sign of insecurity. -
He should. All people should.pawz said:
Sounds like you care.creepycoug said:
That is entirely bullshit. Nothing at all emotional about my take. What a crock of shit and par for the course for a shit brain loud mouth like you. You’re just saying that because you know “emotional” plays well in the tug. As for low information, how about you put your money where your big mouth is and serve up. Because I’ve said plenty and you’ve yet to step in, other than your nothing sandwich “let’s be reasonable”. This isn’t schtick; this is you talking out of your asshole and me calling you out on it.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I don't vote on abortion. That's what low info emotional types and psychos like you do, along with the fundies and leftist chicks who nobody wants to fuck. You're obsessed with it, and you're not interested in a real discussion, just some four minute internet conversion and making more flailing attempts to prove how great you are.creepycoug said:
Very very handsome and fairly successful.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Same lame shtick from you as alwayscreepycoug said:
Lolz. A trailer park assessment of the issue. Par for Bill I guess.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Thinking this carpet bagger (for 15 or 20 years) clown is some kind of a moral authority on abortion is laughable. Nobody can agree on the definition of life. Most European countries don't allow it after 15 weeks. That's reasonable.pawz said:
New book on the shelves, guysm! Get yours today!creepycoug said:
You need to reassess your priorities. I’ve made this plainly clear. If you’re wrong on abortion, you are just wrong as a human being. The rest of your concerns are details by comparison. Seriously think about it.WestlinnDuck said:
Uh, I support limited abortion and it's not in my top 10 priority list. You and the Margaret Sanger wing of the dem party are just as interested in abortion as Michelle Malkin. Speaking of which, what in the hell happened to her?Pitchfork51 said:You nerds have got to give up on this abortion thing. We need more abortions not less
Winning Hearts and Minds
- by Creepy da Cuog
I have thoughts while I’m napping that are more profound than what Bill could ever assimilate with Plato as his tutor.
#butbutbuttheeuropeans!
"You're stupid!"
Please, tell us how handsome and successful you are again. It's definitely not a sign of insecurity.
Pay attention dummy.
It’s really too bad that either you are as stupid as you sound or can’t take this issue seriously and come back with a thoughtful response. Perhaps you agree with me. If so, would that be so terrible? JFC … get over your obsession with my schtick.
So go ahead shit mouth. Take a position, back it up, and you’ll get a no schtick response from me. Don't blame me because you have no game. You said you read my posts, so I’m assuming you’re ready with something.
I'm pretty sure I know what's coming.
A lot. -
If there is one guy who seems like he can handle being disliked, it's Tucker.WestlinnDuck said:
Tucker would be hated at CNN by everyone except for any staff he brought over. Tucker at least can sort of stand Hannity and they can cross chat and have Tucker lead the audience into Hannity's show. Tucker can work with the other Fox reporters like Bill Melugin on the border. CNN has no national conservative infrastructure to support a conservative. Tucker spends a lot of time trashing the CNN and MSLSD reporters and commentators. Tucker's working environment would be hell at CNN. As it is he just has to tolerate Hannity or Brett Baier and just had to avoid Chrissie Wallace. Can't see a CNN executive calling in Tucker and giving him a schedule of CNN morons they want him to prop up. No CNN streaming service like Tucker's show on Fox's subscription service.creepycoug said:
Don't know, but I'd love to see Tucker on CNN. I think he's at his best when he's firing at all kinds of people, and he does that so well. My only negative take, and it's just a slight negative, is the he can sound a little whinny at times. But it's whatever. Jordan Peterson weird me out sometimes when he's cries and gets all emotional, but I can listen to the guy all day.46XiJCAB said:
So is there an O/U on the next CNN head to roll? Asking for a fren.
I think you're right in that he's probably burned too many bridges, but I think he'd great. When I think of Tucker, I don't automatically think conservative, though he certainly isn't a liberal in the today sense ... I tend to think of a guy who can look at issues in political isolation. He's also pretty courageous and willing to call out anybody. I like that about him. -
Although Hannity is significantly worse than Laura. She strikes me as someone I'd prefer to not have to debate. She has a soulless killing machine persona (which she's not), and you always get the feeling she's David Shaw smirking in her head at everybody she interviews. I've heard she was hell on wheels at Dartmouth.46XiJCAB said:I stopped watching Hannity long ago. I have a thing about listening to broken records. I don't. Same with Laura, just can't watch her show anymore.
-
This. The difference between Hannity and Tucker is that Hannity would not turn on Trump no matter the circumstances. He's a team guy. I think Tucker would turn on his mother if he thought she were full of shit. The guy is willing to hammer anybody. I think it helps that he comes from money. He doesn't need any of these gigs and could have walked away years ago. Truly GNFs.WestlinnDuck said:
I never watched Hannity. He is a NeverEnding War republican but did support Trump early. Hannity did a great job along with Levin on Russiagate. But it like his nose is stuck in Lindsey Graham's ass. Graham lives on Hannity and would never show up on Tucker and take it like a man.46XiJCAB said:I stopped watching Hannity long ago. I have a thing about listening to broken records. I don't. Same with Laura, just can't watch her show anymore.
-
I agree, but it's easy to be disliked if the people who dislike you are lying anti-America hating POS and not co-workers. If you define conservatives as open border and one-sided "free trade" at any cost capitalism then Tucker fails. I'd describe me as a pro-American conservative and thus fail that false litmus test.creepycoug said:
If there is one guy who seems like he can handle being disliked, it's Tucker.WestlinnDuck said:
Tucker would be hated at CNN by everyone except for any staff he brought over. Tucker at least can sort of stand Hannity and they can cross chat and have Tucker lead the audience into Hannity's show. Tucker can work with the other Fox reporters like Bill Melugin on the border. CNN has no national conservative infrastructure to support a conservative. Tucker spends a lot of time trashing the CNN and MSLSD reporters and commentators. Tucker's working environment would be hell at CNN. As it is he just has to tolerate Hannity or Brett Baier and just had to avoid Chrissie Wallace. Can't see a CNN executive calling in Tucker and giving him a schedule of CNN morons they want him to prop up. No CNN streaming service like Tucker's show on Fox's subscription service.creepycoug said:
Don't know, but I'd love to see Tucker on CNN. I think he's at his best when he's firing at all kinds of people, and he does that so well. My only negative take, and it's just a slight negative, is the he can sound a little whinny at times. But it's whatever. Jordan Peterson weird me out sometimes when he's cries and gets all emotional, but I can listen to the guy all day.46XiJCAB said:
So is there an O/U on the next CNN head to roll? Asking for a fren.
I think you're right in that he's probably burned too many bridges, but I think he'd great. When I think of Tucker, I don't automatically think conservative, though he certainly isn't a liberal in the today sense ... I tend to think of a guy who can look at issues in political isolation. He's also pretty courageous and willing to call out anybody. I like that about him. -
I'd tap that.
Ingraham, not Hannity.
-
Gross lolPurpleThrobber said:
I'd tap that.
Ingraham, not Hannity.




