Best Of
Re: Where the Big 10 sees Washington in the pecking order
Shocked at the number of serious responses to this post.
Re: 13 million a year for Lane
🚬 has the look, tone, and in-game decisions that the UW fanbase would cream over. Really most fanbases would.
He doesn't sell you on anything and acts offended at the notion that he should, and then backs it up.
haie
Re: 13 million a year for Lane
It's a bit different in that Ole Miss met LSU's offer, yet Kiffin still left.
In fact, this seems to prove the point of those saying that money didn't matter because DeBoer was leaving regardless.
flatus
Re: Hardcore Husky Podcast: When your head coach is the team's weakest link
This is a thoroughly depressing thread
DerekJohnson
Re: Hardcore Husky Podcast: When your head coach is the team's weakest link
I don't know how anyone can be excited moving forward without big changes to how the offense operates.
I thought Hugh Millen covered this nicely (and succinctly, which is odd for him) on with Softy yesterday (caught it by chance).
Fisch is enamored with the pass game and WANTS to win "that way".
We have a head coach more enamored with doing what he wants than with what works and/or best suits our personnel and the situations.
That's incredibly alarming to me and I don't know how you fix that. He's not some 36 year old upstart. I struggle to think that philosophy will change.
Even if Jedd doesn't change and gets personnel to do the pass heavy winning he wants, I still want a coach that can adjust to what the situation and opponent dictate will work the best.
Last Saturday, a good coach would have seen the run game working with #24 and leaned in heavy to all flavors of that, and passes off of that, and only gone with more downfield passing that complemented that plan (play action, etc) and mixed it up once they were loading up to stop the run more consistently.
We're in the Big Ten now. We honestly should be more run-centric than we are. Great defense and running games travel very well.
I'm just not convinced we have a great head coach.
BarbarasHedge
Re: Jiles? Good, Bad, Meh . . . . . . . .
He's interesting. One of our lowest-rated signees but goes to IMG Academy and reports something like 35 total offers and double digit offers from blue blood programs but haven't heard a damn thing about him since he committed.
bananasnblondes
Re: Just blatant racism from the rats
When the party has ZERO ideas for moving the country forward, they result to name calling- constantly.
Bill Maher said it best a couple of weeks ago when he called it the "Sugar Rush" of seeing who can hate Trump the most. It extends to anyone on the right, could be a black politician, a CEO of a health care company, or an activist who visits a college campus.
The name calling is to desensitize their base and become complacent with violence because it was done for the "Greater Good".
georgiaduck
Re: Chauvin needs a new trial
7 pages defending a junkie wife beater who overdosed while resisting arrest
On to narco traffickers and 2028 is ITB for the democrats
You have to be impressed with the improved messaging
All the cops are criminals and all the sinners saints
Pleased to meet you hope you guessed my name
RaceBannon
Re: Playoff chaos
Anything more than 4 teams is too many and I actually think 2 teams in a BCS Championship is the right answer.
