Best Of

I'm working on it. Incidentally, it seems like Everett's grammar has improved a little lately.

The tariff war will push this out of the headlines, and by then most of you won't care what the facts are anyway.

I think I will wait a couple of days until the hype dies down. By then I predict we will see that he probably was a gang member but still had "protected status" which I thought entailed the requirement that he wasn't to be deported without a hearing. Even so, I don't think "deported" is the right word. He's been sent to hell basically. Probably as part of the punishment in El Salvador they have an internet browser which forces them to read Tug.

he was protected by a court order. please to be providing proof he’s a gang member.

”I don’t need proof and I don’t care” - wisdom from Race

The whole thread, all I said was that the government violated his protected status and shipped him to hell. It's a just a fact. That's all.

Nobody said "compassion," which is not the same as rights. Don't be a twister.

It sounds a variation of "round up the usual suspects." Fine, if they show such "credible evidence" or whatever they need to show it. Anyway, they did earlier admit fault in that court filing. A court filing has a legal burden of penalty you know, contrary to some blonde lady just talking.

Is there a link to a writeup on the actual facts at hand in this case? A dumb blonde saying "fact! … such and such" is not so convincing. My understanding is the guy had protected status. He probably was an asshole, but the problem is sending somebody straight to hell without due process if indeed he had protected status.