Best Of

6-6 is more realistic than 10-2.

Just saying.

Some on this board were saying it would be better to win the Holiday Bowl than make the playoffs and lose round one.

Yeah I still don't understand what was up Purdue's ass, but they wanted to rumble.

The point about Petersen is valid. He was 4-5 in the conference in Years 1 and 2 and blew a very winnable game against Oregon in 2015. I was hoping for a quicker turnaround but Pete had the resume to have some patience. I would have fired Pete after 2016 for anything less than 6-3 in the conference.

With Fisch heading into this season I think you would go with the following grading scale.

10-2 - A

9-3 - B

8-4 - C

7-5 - D

6-6 - F

You gotta fire Fisch for 6-6 in Year 2 and at 10-2, he's looking like the fucking Man. Instead, we're stuck him getting a C in year 2. I have significant concerns (50/50) that we'll end up needing to fire Jedd after next year. But it's reckless on so many levels to fire an 8-4 in year 2 guy. It's terrible optics for the program and the next guy could be fucking worse.

Chippiest teams we played all year were Wisconsin and Purdue

comportment

Noticed that, too.

Are we? becoming friends bro?

Sounds like his name was lobbed around for Oregon State and Memphis, and he probably thought neither was significant enough of a step up.

If UW came calling with a $10 million/year contract, something tells me that ass pain would go away pretty quick.