Best Of
Re: The Fisching Report Recruiting Thread Sponsored by The Fisch Bowl
I’m not exactly sure what you’re asking that I’m missing? Lanning has a war chest UW doesn’t due to Nike and daddy warbucks. Definitely less expectations about winning a natty and I’m guessing many duck fans enjoying winning the yearly off season natty with recruiting classes. Much more pressure to win at LSU because their entire state seems all in and maybe Danny likes his dealer in Eugene.
I myself wish you were a multi billionaire so we could have paid Boner enough to stay because he was a great HC. Fisch definitely seems to be a better recruiter on an apples to apples comparison but he falls short of Boner obviously as a proven head coach. Since it looks like we are stuck with Jed I guess all we can do is hope for the best at this point and he focuses more on being the HC for the entire team and gives up play calling for the good of the team. Since this is doubtful I was hoping someone like Florida or ucla would bail us out.
Pressing reboot and having a repeat of Jan.10 2024 wasn’t going to be a pleasant experience.
Re: The Fisching Report Recruiting Thread Sponsored by The Fisch Bowl
I naturally assume UWs players are slightly underrated based off of actual on field results.
The same players that sign with UW get bumps when they flip to certain other teams. One example on the field is Bernard on Bama. Absolutely mid to decent athlete than no ones cried about when he left but now that he's in crimson ESPN can't stop gushing about his gadgety 6 yard runs and the elite WR of him and Williams of whom I wouldn't trade UWs WRs for
Canadawg
Re: The Fisching Report Recruiting Thread Sponsored by The Fisch Bowl
Bernard played over Boston in 2023. Williams had a big freshman year and is still good. What WR’s on UW do you think are better than them? Maybe Boston. That’s it.
I do think Roebuck will be a big time WR, but he also had to play so much because the WR room isn’t very good. I think it needs a transfer so we aren’t relying on a bunch of #2 and #3 types.
RoadDawg55
Re: Hardcore Husky Podcast: When your head coach is the team's weakest link
The bombs that were picked at the goal line vs Wisconsin and Oregon were both huge plays that fucked us.
RoadDawg55
Re: Hardcore Husky Podcast: When your head coach is the team's weakest link
When Jett gets into the opponent 40-25 yard range he starts throwing up passes into the end zone. After he fails at that he has to punt or his QB just threw a pick.
I don't remember him doing anything else to score against solid+ defenses. He even does it to shitty teams, but we can easily make that ground up and throw away drives.
haie
Re: Hardcore Husky Podcast: When your head coach is the team's weakest link
The easiest way to score a lot of points is to have an explosive passing game. I have no problem with wanting an explosive passing game.
You also have to do what the game calls for you to do. Muhammad was rolling and had tons of confidence and should have gotten quite a few more carries before the game got to the fourth quarter.
RoadDawg55
Re: Where Huskies stand in Big Ten power rankings before bowl game
We don’t have a great OL but they were good enough to win. Demond’s first half was the biggest reason we lost. You need good QB play to beat Oregon and he was terrible.
RoadDawg55
Re: Where Huskies stand in Big Ten power rankings before bowl game
Jedd is just here to beat his chest.
haie
Re: Where the Big 10 sees Washington in the pecking order
Washington should be above Oregon too but Oregon is SERIOUS about football
RaceBannon
Re: Hardcore Husky Podcast: When your head coach is the team's weakest link
A GOOD passing game does
Joey
