Any truth to the rumor Utah AD put a bunch of mother aged women in the endzones for motivation?
Oh we’re aware. A bunch of people in CH have been talking about private security patrol for awhile now. Folks in YP are already going that route at least that’s what I’d heard.
That property isn’t next door to Chinook/CH Elementary, but it isn’t exactly a day’s walk either. People are pissed.
looking forward to that BurgerMaster closing its doors within 2 years….
Newberry Crater NM should be a National Park.
I rave as much about that place as any NP. The twin caldera lakes with a cinder cone in between within a larger caldera, the twin waterfalls at the outlet, the massive obsidian flow towerIng above piney forests, one of Oregon’s highest elevation general purpose roads (Paulina Peak) leading to views of the above (sans the falls) plus the Three Sisters and the other Cascade volcanoes, and best of all, the hot springs seeping out of the beach where you can dig your own hot tub.
It can’t be 9 “or less”.
It’s either 9 that they admit to. Or more.
Basic counting and math skills must not be part of the pretend MBA program.
@PostGameOrangeSlices I think you’re underestimating how shitty Northwestern is. Then again, maybe I’m underestimating how shitty the rest of the B1G is. EWIWBI.
Layla topped my list over stairway to heaven and the rest of the usual top 5 all time songs
Creepy is on the road and just now downloading the 2025 rankings. We? can say that the US News ranking is trash, but it's the one to which people pay the most attention. Whether or not any of us likes the idea of "brand", it exists and US News has the most powerful brand, mostly because they were first.
But like all rankings, US News has to tweak their shit every year to mix things up enough to keep people on the edge of their seats waiting with bated breath for the new release. Otherwise, there is so little organic change that schools can or do make from year to year that would ever change the pecking order, and that would be boring.
Last year, US News changed their metrics bigly to benefit public universities because people were bitching that the small to medium sized rich private college model is not the only model for higher ed. So, they responded and public flagships other than the usual suspects (UVa, Cal, UCLA, Michigan) shot up to heights they'd never before seen. UW was one of them.
I haven't seen the change to the criteria this year, but I heard from a friend that they added some heft to the portion of the algo that credits schools with taking in more disadvantaged students and getting them graduated. So, for example, UC Merced, historically the least favored UC school, takes in a ton of Pell grant kids and has a decent graduation rate. This year, they shot up in the rankings. Maybe UW is relatively weaker on that measure as compared to schools that got ranked higher. You can complain about it, but when you really start thinking about this in the big picture (which is a huge waste of tim), you do start to see that there are many valid ways to measure the effectiveness of a school.
For example, it is reasonable to ask whether Harvard and its many many billions is really doing anything that great given who they enroll. Harvard has some huge % of kids whose family hired a private college consultant, which means they have money. They also enroll crazy stats kids. So, you have kids from super advantaged backgrounds, many with massive connections and family money, and kids who are so brilliant that they almost don't need to go to college. All of these people arguably were going to be successful with or without Harvard. You can say the same about Stanford, Amherst, Yale, Brown, etc. What are they really doing? In some ways, yeah, maybe UC Merced is getting more important shit done.
Anyway, all to be taken with a grain of salt, but, I mean, look, we are talking about it on a football message board.
Everyone will talk about Diddy getting killed then they'll actually suicide him anyway
What are you going to do about it? Nothing