Best Of

I know, every response on here has to be "but the left does this and that too." It applies to everyone.

Entertaining that the Dems convinced the poors "this is how inflation is good for you."

The left has been openly opposed to the written law since the 1960s when the Warren Court got going. Just making up law using emanations and penumbras to embrace an organic ever changing to the left US Constitution while ignoring the clear language of the First and Second amendments.

What positive article would you like to see generated?

The Left in those countries also prosecute opposition leaders and those citizens who express doubts in the election results.

No real difference between the Maduro regime and the Biden (American Politburo) regime can be found. Now Joe’s handlers are on a mission to completely destroy trust in SCOTUS unless the decisions there go the Dems’ way.

We’re all just allowing it, too.

What time are the Olympics’ Dribble Ball games?

They own Hi-Tech, they own the media, they opened our borders, now they are going after our Constitution and the very foundation the country is based on. They want to change the constitution, change the rules. Its biden, the lame duck, doing what he is told. This now puts it out in the open and allows those who run the search engines and the media to keep it in front of everyone in the country until they get what they want.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-calls-supreme-court-term-limits-code-conduct-limits-presidential-immunity

Biden argues the Supreme Court has 'undermined the public's confidence'

Loving that n

Love that nobody besides @Goduckies bothered to answer my question, followed by throwing out insults and then say I'm the one attacking the bored. I wasn't even forming an argument, I was posing a question. Not trying to bait. If I wanted to ragebait like Mello or HH I would just do it. It's easy to troll. Tougher to actually have a discussion.

I think it's pretty clear that this bored and others who think like it refuse to accept any result of the election that doesn't have Trump winning. So why even hold the election then? "My guy will win, but if he doesn't, it must be cheating. Must be all the illegals. Must be the voting machines. Must be the mail in ballots." This is the process we have. Both sides will accuse the other of foul play. It's going to happen right away. But if we're heading down a path where the losing side refuses to accept any situation where they lose, it's a dangerous way to go.

Keep in mind, and I'll say it again to stem the "you're just a leftard commie" flood: I think Kamala's a shit candidate. I don't expect her to win. She's only slightly more likeable than Hillary and that's still a low bar. She wouldn't be my 1st choice or even my 100th. But that's where it is. There are plenty of reasons to dislike her and Democrat policy. I disagree with a lot of it. I also disagree with the far right and Christian nationalism because I think it's both unconstitutional as it pertains to separating church and state, and moves our country backwards. Regardless, Kamala could still win. That's the subject of this thread. So what happens if she does?

Kind of a big IF, Gasbag, but not one you're going to let stop you from spewing ignorance about elections

So, every election.

Furthermore, the miniscule evidence of voter fraud in the previous two elections has been found to have benefited Trump overall. Hilarious considering the MAGA narrative, but true nonetheless.

Next.

Walking out to Fiddy is OG