Best Of
Re: We'll be podding at 9AM
On a scale from Fired-at-the-50 to Tarmac'd, where does that 3 and out sequence to start the second half land for you guys?
Sure you could have pointed to the first half, but that's when the game truly felt like it was in Iowa/Indiana territory from last year.
Also how bad is our tight end situation and left tackle situation right now?
Is a Greene Mills Hatchett Finai Azzopardi OL going to make you feel better going into next year?
haie
Re: Lol loser program
Fisch needed to bring all his Arizona players last year including Fifita and McMillan and especially the OL. The first red flag was him bringing about 10% even then we are probably 9-3 or 10-2 at best and similar this year.
WoolleyDoog
Re: Franklin for Fisch?
Michigan has advantages at a few spots but Washington's talent and stars that have been fluffed all season was more than enough to to win this game.
Advanced metrics can suck my dick when it comes to talent composition.
Michigan's own radio guy was lamenting to softy how they don't have enough talent on offense.
Our coaches had a terrible game plan against them. Period.
haie
Re: Predict final w/L record post Oregon. Be serious and no malarkey
Yeah the funny thing about yesterday was that Illinois, Wisconsin, Purdue, UCLA, and then Oregon is right in this staff's wheelhouse to pop off about at the end of this year.
haie
Re: Predict final w/L record post Oregon. Be serious and no malarkey
Of course everyone is going to say 7-5 the day after a loss. It's emotional, I get it.
But I don't think they lose three or more games. None of the teams they play are that great.
10-2 would be a surprise.
7-5 would be kind of a surprise.
8-4 is realistic.
9-3 doesn't require full dewg energy. So, yeah, any way will be interesting. No way they drop Purdue or Wisconsin. If you can't pencil those in, it's officially off the rails.
Optimistically they drop one of Illinois, UCLA and Oregon. I don't think it'll be UCLA just because of how much we? talk about it as an automatic loss … I think the reverse jinx script has been sufficiently set and nobody at UCLA cares enough to try and reverse the reverse.
The one I keep thinking will happen is Oregon. It's here, we're? queer, and the program's identity, nay it's katra, is beating Oregon. Moore showed he will wilt if he gets popped a few times and I think we? can run on their defense. Put in a lot of packages for the QB who has everything you look for to get out of the pocket and throw or run, and I think Washington could be a real problem for the Ducks at home. If Fisch designs packages to use said QB to keep the offense on the field and convert third downs with his legs, I could see it being a long day for the Ducks' defense.
I'm hoping this isn't too intellectual. I have a dumbed down version ready to go just in case, eh?
Re: Franklin for Fisch?
You think you have perspective, but really all you have are excuses.
The script is:
Tequila says stupid shit.
Tequila backtracks.
Tequila moves the goalposts.
Tequila prevaricates.
Tequila thinks he's the smartest guy in the room.
Rinse repeat. Just stop poasting.
dtd
Re: Meanwhile in God’s conference
I turned to my fat lesbian wife and muttered “at least we have our Mariners.” Then, I cried like a little bitch using her oversized B1G DUMPER sweatshirt as a makeshift kleenex. Then I came in my pants. Lifelong UW fan as well. Born in the huskie stadium urinal trough.
PurpleJ
Re: Lol loser program
I know what you’re saying but Fisch isn’t Harbaugh. Fisch isn’t DeBoer. Fisch at the moment feels like one of the many guys who cycled through the pac-10/12 who were fine but not good enough to ever reach the top and the hopes of the program for the next 2.5 seasons are pinned on a 5’9 QB fresh off throwing unforced ints LBs who look and have names like they’re from Sedro-Woolley
WoolleyDoog


