Best Of
Re: How Far Can Demond Williams Take the Dawgs?
You can’t expect a national reporter to know these things.
Re: I'm just here for the WWIII predictions
@DucksFC admits he’s here solely to troll, and the worst part is he’s too poor to even pay for his trolling.
He’s also terrible at it. This is due to his low IQ.
I think MTG is a kook, but her constituents seem to like her, and she’s been consistent in her views on foreign wars. The dishonesty of TugTards is just as consistent as MTG’s views on Iran.
Re: Steve Bannon reaction
Actually the Israelis did the heavy lifting of knocking out their air defense, commanders, leaders etc. We just bombed the big facilities they couldn't as they don;t have the means.
Sledog
Re: Steve Bannon reaction
No. Either you think Iran was working on developing everything they needed to deliver a nuclear weapon with an ICBM to the US or you don't. Bannon hasn't explained why the Iranian Death to America crowd was enriching uranium in underground bunkers beyond was was needed to fuel nuclear power plants and had mid-range ballistic missiles to deliver nukes to Israel. And why that wasn't a national risk. And why if they weren't wasn't the IAEA given free inspection rights. Iranian missiles were being fired at US Navy ships in international waters along with cargo and oil tankers. It's not like they didn't have a track record. Pretending that Trump has more to explain is obtuse and infantile.
WestlinnDuck
Re: Iran eats some MOABs
As good of an argument as I've seen FOR the strike.
Was thinking on it last night some more. Israel also already ate the brunt of retaliation. Iran has few assets left in the form of missiles regionally to lob at us at this point.
I'm also wondering if this was to keep them from moving nuclear materials out of those facilities to pass along to other proxies.
UW_Doog_Bot




