You guys laugh but little Jimmy McCracken is a left handed 12 year old suffering from cancer who only wants to fish one last time
His parents can no longer afford the reel
Keeping the trend going of 25 seasons in this millennium - how do you rank the past 25 Husky seasons not just by success but also by enjoyability?
25. 2008 0-12 (0-9)
24. 2004 1-10 (0-8) - low-key this team was probably worse than 2008 (definitely if 08 has a healthy Lockner)
23. 2005 2-9 (1-7) - Another low-key just all time bad team
22. 2021 4-8 (3-6)
21. 2007 4-9 (2-7)
20. 2006 5-7 (3-6) - Underrated what if scene - we were on track to win at least 8-9 with a healthy Stands back
19. 2020 COVID BS
18. 2003 6-6 (4-4) - 500 but doom felt imminent
17. 2014 8-6 (4-5)
16. 2024 6-7 (4-5)
15. 2019 8-5 (4-5) - Eight wins but boy what disappointing joyless season
14. 2009 5-7 (4-5) - forgot we go boweling this year if we either don't schedule two blue bloods out of conference or get fucked in South Bend
13. 2015 7-6 (4-5) - Peterman's version of 2009
12. 2002 7-6 (4-4) - Started season #11 and should have won at Michigan. NW Championship run was special but getting beat by Purdue in El Paso and original we lost to Cal was not
11. 2012 7-6 (5-4)
10. 2011 7-6 (5-4)
9. 2013 9-4 (5-4) - honestly highlight may have been trading Sark for Peterlips.
8. 2001 8-4 (6-2)
7. 2010 7-6 (5-4) - better records above, but this felt great getting back to a bowl game, and a redemption win over Bo Pelenis in San Diego
6. 2017 10-3 (7-2) - A joyless fucking 10-win season. Ridiculous this team lost more than one Pac-12 game.
5. 2018 10-4 (7-2)
4. 2022 11-2 (7-2) - Weird since we had traumatic losses at UCLA and ASU, but one of the most enjoyable seasons in Husky history down the stretch
3. 2000 11-1 (7-1)
2. 2016 12-2 (8-1) - You could sell me on either order of 2000 and 2016
Soccerduck with the improved messaging
It's not dudes showering with your daughter it's maga caring about it that's the problem
Good job
Because @RaceBannon made the list and is always first and right
Just her payback for participating in the coverup. Book advance in the millions. Book sales in the tens.
Good little party member. Fake outrage. Ka-Ching.
They'll all do it so it looks like Cho Bai Den was the sole traitor.
They have light rail from downtown Portland to the Airport on the eastside of town. Took it once. Pretty sure less than 10% of the passengers actually paid. Was a total freak show. No way that I would take it again. Nothing says success like a dem public transportation project. When the grift to dem construction company donors and bus/train manufacturers and dem consultants and employees are the intended beneficiaries instead of the public you have a problem. $200 million (old dollars) put into the public burn ban for 2.2 miles of track and zero revenue. At least no tariff money was involved.
https://pjmedia.com/catherinesalgado/2025/06/03/guess-how-much-dc-dems-spent-on-streetcars-theyre-now-ditching-n4940399
Guess How Much D.C. Dems Wasted on Streetcars They’re Now Ditching?The streetcar left much to be desired. The Democrat-run city of Washington, D.C., is derailing its $200 million boondoggle streetcar system only 10 years after the streetcars began to operate. Oh well, $200 million of our hard-earned taxpayer funds down the drain — on to the next expensive wasteful project!
The costly D.C. streetcar system, only 2.2 miles long, is going into the trash heap 15 years after the track was first laid and only a decade into operations. The streetcars were justified originally as being more “environmentally friendly” — Dems love to shove in the climate hoax everywhere — and more accessible. They were also meant to be more “aesthetically pleasing.” Instead, the streetcar system was a cash-draining catastrophe and will soon be replaced again with buses.
D.C. mayor and professional incompetent Muriel Bowser desperately tried to obscure the failure of the streetcar line by asserting that the electric bus replacement is a “next generation streetcar,” National Pulse noted.
Expect more disasters — electric vehicles are expensive, inefficient, and the batteries die faster and are very toxic to manufacture and dispose of. Not to mention our already strained grid can’t really handle increases in electric vehicles. If D.C. is bent on electric buses, the city transit system is only continuing to careen toward crisis.
The electric bus that will replace the H Street streetcar will utilize the existing overhead power cables, meaning it will still suffer from some of the existing drawbacks that the failed street-level rail system did. Notably, the existing rail line lacks a barrier separating it from the street, which has resulted in the streetcar being unable to proceed forward when a car is double-parked and blocking its track. While the electric bus will not be confined to a track in the same manner as the streetcar, the overhead cables will still limit its maneuverability.
Never learn from your mistakes — that’s the Democrat motto. Fortunately, city leadership can afford luxurious private transport, so they can continue to ruin ordinary citizens’ lives without experiencing the consequences themselves.
The National Pulse emphasized the failure of the streetcar system:
In over one decade of operation, the D.C. streetcar has never once generated a single dollar of revenue. It operates on a $10 million taxpayer subsidy per year.
The D.C. Democrats are determined to continue implementing an inefficient, unreliable, and very expensive “green” public transit system, despite facing serious budget issues. The definition of insanity is Democrats doubling down on idiocy over and over again and demanding you believe the lie that this time, there will be different results.
You left out you being in favor of raising every tax known and adding more
Hilarious 😂
Hoping Husky legend DeBoer gets fired at Bama so my DAWGS can bring him back home.