Best Of
Re: Iran eats some MOABs
As good of an argument as I've seen FOR the strike.
Was thinking on it last night some more. Israel also already ate the brunt of retaliation. Iran has few assets left in the form of missiles regionally to lob at us at this point.
I'm also wondering if this was to keep them from moving nuclear materials out of those facilities to pass along to other proxies.
UW_Doog_Bot
Re: I'm just here for the WWIII predictions
She isn't wrong here, and IF Trump drags us into some bullshit war I will be right here saying he should get the fuck out. But, the nuclear strikes, as a very limited singular objective, were 100% needed and justified. With any luck now that the objective has been met (apparently) we can work on a diplomatic path forward with any non-lunatics left alive in Iran and achieve a lasting peace with no worry about a nuclear armed terrorist state in the near future.
Swaye
Re: I'm just here for the WWIII predictions
Americans are armed bro
Run over by a F150 then shot dead
RaceBannon
Re: We bombed Iran, apparently…
Speculation…What ifs, hypotheticals.. Weakness. It was time to stop running from the problem. President Trump’s #1 obligation is to protect the people and interests of the United States. And by the way, for those doubting the legitimacy of his actions as unconstitutional, read Public Law 107-40, specifically the second part. Again, justifiable as previous presidents before him.
Re: Trump brokers peace treaty between Congo and Rwanda
I was wondering how this was a bad thing
RaceBannon
Re: Lost in the embarrassing meltdown last night
The Obama deal was to allow Iran to get nukes
RaceBannon



