Seems the odds are that if Dabo stays at Clempson for a while longer, he will win another NT. 2 NTs at Clempson (i.e., Tier II school) would have to get a coach into Mt Rushmore consideration would it not?
Yep if they (we?) have learned anything from blowing '14 not playing Deshaun up front and play Trevor Lawrence from the get-go, they are odds on favorites. And they are recruiting just as well as Bama.
Dabo is a clown, but holy shit: results.
Going into the Syracuse locker room post L and congratulating them is a douche canoe clown as it gets. Fuck off with that shit. Still, the results are there. You win a Natty in the CFP era at a Tier II school - albeit one with high ceiling - something about your program is working.
Pete needs to incorporate two Dabo things to get to Dabo's level: fun and openness.
Dabo keeps high standards and he does not fuck around with assistant coaches. He creates an atmosphere where he would NEVER protect under-recruiting white dudes. He needs everyone to be great at everything and he demands it.
I have a lot of respect for the way he's done it. Dabo is weird, but he's a fast-strategy guy and he's tuned in with the fast-strategy kids. Chris Petersen has a great personality, but his bullshit tight-ass routine is fucking pointless.
Dabo is open as shit and is winning Natties.
None of our media members have the balls to ask Pete about the fact that literally every other program has a big spring game. We just suck our own dicks and tell ourselves it doesn't matter.
Pete would win a natty in his fifth year if he was at South Carolina. The demographics are just better
Seems the odds are that if Dabo stays at Clempson for a while longer, he will win another NT. 2 NTs at Clempson (i.e., Tier II school) would have to get a coach into Mt Rushmore consideration would it not?
Yep if they (we?) have learned anything from blowing '14 not playing Deshaun up front and play Trevor Lawrence from the get-go, they are odds on favorites. And they are recruiting just as well as Bama.
Dabo is a clown, but holy shit: results.
Going into the Syracuse locker room post L and congratulating them is a douche canoe clown as it gets. Fuck off with that shit. Still, the results are there. You win a Natty in the CFP era at a Tier II school - albeit one with high ceiling - something about your program is working.
Pete needs to incorporate two Dabo things to get to Dabo's level: fun and openness.
Dabo keeps high standards and he does not fuck around with assistant coaches. He creates an atmosphere where he would NEVER protect under-recruiting white dudes. He needs everyone to be great at everything and he demands it.
I have a lot of respect for the way he's done it. Dabo is weird, but he's a fast-strategy guy and he's tuned in with the fast-strategy kids. Chris Petersen has a great personality, but his bullshit tight-ass routine is fucking pointless.
Dabo is open as shit and is winning Natties.
None of our media members have the balls to ask Pete about the fact that literally every other program has a big spring game. We just suck our own dicks and tell ourselves it doesn't matter.
Pete would win a natty in his fifth year if he was at South Carolina. The demographics are just better
Exactly. The West Coast has no natural recrootin' advantage over the SEC other than QB.
Seems the odds are that if Dabo stays at Clempson for a while longer, he will win another NT. 2 NTs at Clempson (i.e., Tier II school) would have to get a coach into Mt Rushmore consideration would it not?
Yep if they (we?) have learned anything from blowing '14 not playing Deshaun up front and play Trevor Lawrence from the get-go, they are odds on favorites. And they are recruiting just as well as Bama.
Dabo is a clown, but holy shit: results.
Going into the Syracuse locker room post L and congratulating them is a douche canoe clown as it gets. Fuck off with that shit. Still, the results are there. You win a Natty in the CFP era at a Tier II school - albeit one with high ceiling - something about your program is working.
Pete needs to incorporate two Dabo things to get to Dabo's level: fun and openness.
Dabo keeps high standards and he does not fuck around with assistant coaches. He creates an atmosphere where he would NEVER protect under-recruiting white dudes. He needs everyone to be great at everything and he demands it.
I have a lot of respect for the way he's done it. Dabo is weird, but he's a fast-strategy guy and he's tuned in with the fast-strategy kids. Chris Petersen has a great personality, but his bullshit tight-ass routine is fucking pointless.
Dabo is open as shit and is winning Natties.
None of our media members have the balls to ask Pete about the fact that literally every other program has a big spring game. We just suck our own dicks and tell ourselves it doesn't matter.
Pete would win a natty in his fifth year if he was at South Carolina. The demographics are just better
Exactly. The West Coast has no natural recrootin' advantage over the SEC other than QB and Polys.
Polys are demographically superior to blacks on a per capita football playing basis. There's just not nearly as many of them in the West as there are blacks int he south.
Seems the odds are that if Dabo stays at Clempson for a while longer, he will win another NT. 2 NTs at Clempson (i.e., Tier II school) would have to get a coach into Mt Rushmore consideration would it not?
Yep if they (we?) have learned anything from blowing '14 not playing Deshaun up front and play Trevor Lawrence from the get-go, they are odds on favorites. And they are recruiting just as well as Bama.
Dabo is a clown, but holy shit: results.
Going into the Syracuse locker room post L and congratulating them is a douche canoe clown as it gets. Fuck off with that shit. Still, the results are there. You win a Natty in the CFP era at a Tier II school - albeit one with high ceiling - something about your program is working.
Pete needs to incorporate two Dabo things to get to Dabo's level: fun and openness.
Dabo keeps high standards and he does not fuck around with assistant coaches. He creates an atmosphere where he would NEVER protect under-recruiting white dudes. He needs everyone to be great at everything and he demands it.
I have a lot of respect for the way he's done it. Dabo is weird, but he's a fast-strategy guy and he's tuned in with the fast-strategy kids. Chris Petersen has a great personality, but his bullshit tight-ass routine is fucking pointless.
Dabo is open as shit and is winning Natties.
None of our media members have the balls to ask Pete about the fact that literally every other program has a big spring game. We just suck our own dicks and tell ourselves it doesn't matter.
Pete would win a natty in his fifth year if he was at South Carolina. The demographics are just better
I don't buy this at all. This shit is getting out of hand with the demographics shit. There are more black people, but there are also 3x the amount of schools recruiting them.
The reason why the Pac-12 sucks is because USC is down and our brand is killing us, so like 30% of good players are leaving the west whereas only 5-7% leave the south.
And Pete wouldn't win shit at South Carolina. USC is like winning at Cal. He would get them good, but never Natties.
I'm so sick of this fucking one-factor thinking. Oh they have a lot of talent there. YEAH BUT THEY HAVE MORE TEAMS SHIT FOR BRAINS.
In 2015-16 the top 4*+ talent producing states were
TX: 59.5 CA: 54.5 FL: 45.5 GA: 33 OH: 22.5
But here are the amounts of P5 schools in-region (overlapping conference ties or adjacent states):
So, basically even though there are more players in the south, the competition is much more fierce. It gets even heavier if you consider the amount of tier 1 and 2 teams within a 550 mile radius of primary population centers (this is the length you need to connect UW to LA.
Near CA: (3-4) UW, UCLA and USC (Oregon?).
Near to TX: (8-9) A&M, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, LSU, Arkansas, Iowa and Bama (Wiscy just out of range; Colorado sucks, but maybe?).
Near to FL: (12) FSU, UF, Miami, UGA, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Tennessee, LSU, VTech, Ohio State, A&M
Near to GA: (14) FSU, UF, Miami, UGA, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Tennessee, LSU, VTech, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Penn State, Notre Dame
Near to OH: (15) Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State, Notre Dame, Wisconsin, Iowa, Tennessee, Auburn, Alabama, Arkansas, VTech, FSU, UF, UGA, Clemson
So - the teams in the south are competing with 3x the big time programs (or more) on average.
Seems the odds are that if Dabo stays at Clempson for a while longer, he will win another NT. 2 NTs at Clempson (i.e., Tier II school) would have to get a coach into Mt Rushmore consideration would it not?
Yep if they (we?) have learned anything from blowing '14 not playing Deshaun up front and play Trevor Lawrence from the get-go, they are odds on favorites. And they are recruiting just as well as Bama.
Dabo is a clown, but holy shit: results.
Going into the Syracuse locker room post L and congratulating them is a douche canoe clown as it gets. Fuck off with that shit. Still, the results are there. You win a Natty in the CFP era at a Tier II school - albeit one with high ceiling - something about your program is working.
Pete needs to incorporate two Dabo things to get to Dabo's level: fun and openness.
Dabo keeps high standards and he does not fuck around with assistant coaches. He creates an atmosphere where he would NEVER protect under-recruiting white dudes. He needs everyone to be great at everything and he demands it.
I have a lot of respect for the way he's done it. Dabo is weird, but he's a fast-strategy guy and he's tuned in with the fast-strategy kids. Chris Petersen has a great personality, but his bullshit tight-ass routine is fucking pointless.
Dabo is open as shit and is winning Natties.
None of our media members have the balls to ask Pete about the fact that literally every other program has a big spring game. We just suck our own dicks and tell ourselves it doesn't matter.
Pete would win a natty in his fifth year if he was at South Carolina. The demographics are just better
I don't buy this at all. This shit is getting out of hand with the demographics shit. There are more black people, but there are also 3x the amount of schools recruiting them.
The reason why the Pac-12 sucks is because USC is down and our brand is killing us, so like 30% of good players are leaving the west whereas only 5-7% leave the south.
And Pete wouldn't win shit at South Carolina. USC is like winning at Cal. He would get them good, but never Natties.
I'm so sick of this fucking one-factor thinking. Oh they have a lot of talent there. YEAH BUT THEY HAVE MORE TEAMS SHIT FOR BRAINS.
In 2015-16 the top 4*+ talent producing states were
TX: 59.5 CA: 54.5 FL: 45.5 GA: 33 OH: 22.5
But here are the amounts of P5 schools in-region (overlapping conference ties or adjacent states):
So, basically even though there are more players in the south, the competition is much more fierce. It gets even heavier if you consider the amount of tier 1 and 2 teams within a 550 mile radius of primary population centers (this is the length you need to connect UW to LA.
Near CA: (3-4) UW, UCLA and USC (Oregon?).
Near to TX: (8-9) A&M, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, LSU, Arkansas, Iowa and Bama (Wiscy just out of range; Colorado sucks, but maybe?).
Near to FL: (12) FSU, UF, Miami, UGA, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Tennessee, LSU, VTech, Ohio State, A&M
Near to GA: (14) FSU, UF, Miami, UGA, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Tennessee, LSU, VTech, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Penn State, Notre Dame
Near to OH: (15) Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State, Notre Dame, Wisconsin, Iowa, Tennessee, Auburn, Alabama, Arkansas, VTech, FSU, UF, UGA, Clemson
So - the teams in the south are competing with 3x the big time programs (or more) on average.
There are no fucking excuses.
more people= more recruits= larger demographic=more schools=more "bluebloods"= more competition it's not hard.
Seems the odds are that if Dabo stays at Clempson for a while longer, he will win another NT. 2 NTs at Clempson (i.e., Tier II school) would have to get a coach into Mt Rushmore consideration would it not?
Yep if they (we?) have learned anything from blowing '14 not playing Deshaun up front and play Trevor Lawrence from the get-go, they are odds on favorites. And they are recruiting just as well as Bama.
Dabo is a clown, but holy shit: results.
Going into the Syracuse locker room post L and congratulating them is a douche canoe clown as it gets. Fuck off with that shit. Still, the results are there. You win a Natty in the CFP era at a Tier II school - albeit one with high ceiling - something about your program is working.
Pete needs to incorporate two Dabo things to get to Dabo's level: fun and openness.
Dabo keeps high standards and he does not fuck around with assistant coaches. He creates an atmosphere where he would NEVER protect under-recruiting white dudes. He needs everyone to be great at everything and he demands it.
I have a lot of respect for the way he's done it. Dabo is weird, but he's a fast-strategy guy and he's tuned in with the fast-strategy kids. Chris Petersen has a great personality, but his bullshit tight-ass routine is fucking pointless.
Dabo is open as shit and is winning Natties.
None of our media members have the balls to ask Pete about the fact that literally every other program has a big spring game. We just suck our own dicks and tell ourselves it doesn't matter.
Pete would win a natty in his fifth year if he was at South Carolina. The demographics are just better
I don't buy this at all. This shit is getting out of hand with the demographics shit. There are more black people, but there are also 3x the amount of schools recruiting them.
The reason why the Pac-12 sucks is because USC is down and our brand is killing us, so like 30% of good players are leaving the west whereas only 5-7% leave the south.
And Pete wouldn't win shit at South Carolina. USC is like winning at Cal. He would get them good, but never Natties.
I'm so sick of this fucking one-factor thinking. Oh they have a lot of talent there. YEAH BUT THEY HAVE MORE TEAMS SHIT FOR BRAINS.
In 2015-16 the top 4*+ talent producing states were
TX: 59.5 CA: 54.5 FL: 45.5 GA: 33 OH: 22.5
But here are the amounts of P5 schools in-region (overlapping conference ties or adjacent states):
So, basically even though there are more players in the south, the competition is much more fierce. It gets even heavier if you consider the amount of tier 1 and 2 teams within a 550 mile radius of primary population centers (this is the length you need to connect UW to LA.
Near CA: (3-4) UW, UCLA and USC (Oregon?).
Near to TX: (8-9) A&M, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, LSU, Arkansas, Iowa and Bama (Wiscy just out of range; Colorado sucks, but maybe?).
Near to FL: (12) FSU, UF, Miami, UGA, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Tennessee, LSU, VTech, Ohio State, A&M
Near to GA: (14) FSU, UF, Miami, UGA, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Tennessee, LSU, VTech, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Penn State, Notre Dame
Near to OH: (15) Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State, Notre Dame, Wisconsin, Iowa, Tennessee, Auburn, Alabama, Arkansas, VTech, FSU, UF, UGA, Clemson
So - the teams in the south are competing with 3x the big time programs (or more) on average.
Seems the odds are that if Dabo stays at Clempson for a while longer, he will win another NT. 2 NTs at Clempson (i.e., Tier II school) would have to get a coach into Mt Rushmore consideration would it not?
Yep if they (we?) have learned anything from blowing '14 not playing Deshaun up front and play Trevor Lawrence from the get-go, they are odds on favorites. And they are recruiting just as well as Bama.
Dabo is a clown, but holy shit: results.
Going into the Syracuse locker room post L and congratulating them is a douche canoe clown as it gets. Fuck off with that shit. Still, the results are there. You win a Natty in the CFP era at a Tier II school - albeit one with high ceiling - something about your program is working.
Pete needs to incorporate two Dabo things to get to Dabo's level: fun and openness.
Dabo keeps high standards and he does not fuck around with assistant coaches. He creates an atmosphere where he would NEVER protect under-recruiting white dudes. He needs everyone to be great at everything and he demands it.
I have a lot of respect for the way he's done it. Dabo is weird, but he's a fast-strategy guy and he's tuned in with the fast-strategy kids. Chris Petersen has a great personality, but his bullshit tight-ass routine is fucking pointless.
Dabo is open as shit and is winning Natties.
None of our media members have the balls to ask Pete about the fact that literally every other program has a big spring game. We just suck our own dicks and tell ourselves it doesn't matter.
We can agree, of course, that Dabo recruits a market with way more Fast Strategy black kids than Pete, so it's not like you could put Dabo at Washington and have guaranteed success. Harkening back to some comments you've made in the past, Pete is doing it about 95% right. He still might get us to the Promised land in spite of the other 5%. Mor Poly shirt fucking and Jacob beating out Jake for the 2019 starting job would help.
I think we are a poly pipeline and a good qb away from being where we want to be and that's it. Regardless of Pete's strengths or shortcomings. We get those two things(and don't regress in other areas) and we are regularly winning the Pac and shooting for the CFP's. Both of those things are also, hopefully, being built right now.
Not saying we couldn't be better without some other changes so don't twist.
CA - 15.5 players per Tier I&II programs TX - 7 players FL - 3.8 players GA - 2.4 players OH - 1.5 players
I bolded it so you idiots could get the point.
People are stupid. Also, thanks Larry Scott FS and FS Pac 12 ADS/marketing departments. It's why kids are leaving the WC in droves.
THIRTY PERCENT OF OUR FOUR+ STARS LEAVE THE REGION.
THIRTY.
If this isn't a fucking crisis, I don't know what the fuck is.
The marketing of the entire conference and each individual school is horrendous. UW, Oregon (to some extent albeit very faggy but the kids love it), and USC are doing a great job on the social media front (graphics, content, involvement etc.). The rest of the schools are just pure aids. UW's marketing as a whole is yikes, from the uniforms (hopefully they get fixed) to the overall branding. SC is SC. Oregon is just trying to hard.
The three schools that combined social media content, uniforms, branding, and just general marketing the best are Clemson, Ohio State, and Alabama hmmmm. The best is Clemson however.
The conference marketing as a whole is dreck. It has no identity and is all over the map. The tv stations suck, the social media accounts suck, everything sucks. Fire Larry Scott and please bring in more talented marketers and designers.
Does Washington State even have an in-house designer/marketing department because their social media shit is pathetic. There are MWC, MAC and FCS schools (Eastern WA, and a lot of the bigger east coast FCS schools ) that put out much much much better content.
ASU is turrrrible.
OSU lol.
Cal eww.
USC is boring.
UCLA is decent.
Oregon is good but super gay (their brand is weak and faggy).
Stanford CHRYST.
Colorado bhahahahahaha.
Utah, the most mormon thing I've ever seen.
UofA uhhhh see WSU.
UW is alright but could be amazing. creative staff is unbelievable but their marketing department bahahaha christ. Don't we have the foster school or no?
If you think this shit doesn't matter in recruiting:
CA - 15.5 players per Tier I&II programs TX - 7 players FL - 3.8 players GA - 2.4 players OH - 1.5 players
I bolded it so you idiots could get the point.
People are stupid. Also, thanks Larry Scott FS and FS Pac 12 ADS/marketing departments. It's why kids are leaving the WC in droves.
THIRTY PERCENT OF OUR FOUR+ STARS LEAVE THE REGION.
THIRTY.
If this isn't a fucking crisis, I don't know what the fuck is.
If an sec kid doesn't go to the home town school he and his family are shamed forever.
When kids from the West leave everyone says shit like "he's just gotta do what's best for him"
You are an ASU fan. You wouldn’t understand.
Huh
I'm saying the fans suck out west and let kids leave pac land
"You play to win the game" " Why is knowledge" that's why kids leave the pac-12 lol. Incompetence starts from the top (Hi Larry) and works its way down to every basically every AD and coach in the conference.
CA - 15.5 players per Tier I&II programs TX - 7 players FL - 3.8 players GA - 2.4 players OH - 1.5 players
I bolded it so you idiots could get the point.
People are stupid. Also, thanks Larry Scott FS and FS Pac 12 ADS/marketing departments. It's why kids are leaving the WC in droves.
THIRTY PERCENT OF OUR FOUR+ STARS LEAVE THE REGION.
THIRTY.
If this isn't a fucking crisis, I don't know what the fuck is.
If an sec kid doesn't go to the home town school he and his family are shamed forever.
When kids from the West leave everyone says shit like "he's just gotta do what's best for him"
You are an ASU fan. You wouldn’t understand.
Huh
I'm saying the fans suck out west and let kids leave pac land
"You play to win the game" " Why is knowledge" that's why kids leave the pac-12 lol. Incompetence starts from the top (Hi Larry) and works its way down to every basically every AD and coach in the conference.
I don't need your teenage philosophy
The pac sucks because the entire south part of the conference decided to be shitty at the same time.
And Stanford being good throws everything way out of whack
CA - 15.5 players per Tier I&II programs TX - 7 players FL - 3.8 players GA - 2.4 players OH - 1.5 players
I bolded it so you idiots could get the point.
People are stupid. Also, thanks Larry Scott FS and FS Pac 12 ADS/marketing departments. It's why kids are leaving the WC in droves.
THIRTY PERCENT OF OUR FOUR+ STARS LEAVE THE REGION.
THIRTY.
If this isn't a fucking crisis, I don't know what the fuck is.
If an sec kid doesn't go to the home town school he and his family are shamed forever.
When kids from the West leave everyone says shit like "he's just gotta do what's best for him"
You are an ASU fan. You wouldn’t understand.
Huh
I'm saying the fans suck out west and let kids leave pac land
"You play to win the game" " Why is knowledge" that's why kids leave the pac-12 lol. Incompetence starts from the top (Hi Larry) and works its way down to every basically every AD and coach in the conference.
I don't need your teenage philosophy
The pac sucks because the entire south part of the conference decided to be shitty at the same time.
And Stanford being good throws everything way out of whack
How do you get good players? Wow by relating to teenagers!!1!!
CA - 15.5 players per Tier I&II programs TX - 7 players FL - 3.8 players GA - 2.4 players OH - 1.5 players
I bolded it so you idiots could get the point.
People are stupid. Also, thanks Larry Scott FS and FS Pac 12 ADS/marketing departments. It's why kids are leaving the WC in droves.
THIRTY PERCENT OF OUR FOUR+ STARS LEAVE THE REGION.
THIRTY.
If this isn't a fucking crisis, I don't know what the fuck is.
If an sec kid doesn't go to the home town school he and his family are shamed forever.
When kids from the West leave everyone says shit like "he's just gotta do what's best for him"
You are an ASU fan. You wouldn’t understand.
Huh
I'm saying the fans suck out west and let kids leave pac land
"You play to win the game" " Why is knowledge" that's why kids leave the pac-12 lol. Incompetence starts from the top (Hi Larry) and works its way down to every basically every AD and coach in the conference.
I don't need your teenage philosophy
The pac sucks because the entire south part of the conference decided to be shitty at the same time.
And Stanford being good throws everything way out of whack
How do you get good players? Wow by relating to teenagers!!1!!
Comments
The reason why the Pac-12 sucks is because USC is down and our brand is killing us, so like 30% of good players are leaving the west whereas only 5-7% leave the south.
And Pete wouldn't win shit at South Carolina. USC is like winning at Cal. He would get them good, but never Natties.
I'm so sick of this fucking one-factor thinking. Oh they have a lot of talent there. YEAH BUT THEY HAVE MORE TEAMS SHIT FOR BRAINS.
In 2015-16 the top 4*+ talent producing states were
TX: 59.5
CA: 54.5
FL: 45.5
GA: 33
OH: 22.5
But here are the amounts of P5 schools in-region (overlapping conference ties or adjacent states):
TX: 24 (Big XII/SEC)
CA: 12 (Pac-12)
FL: 29 (SEC/ACC)
GA: 29 (SEC/ACC)
OH: 42 (B1G, SEC, ACC)
So, basically even though there are more players in the south, the competition is much more fierce. It gets even heavier if you consider the amount of tier 1 and 2 teams within a 550 mile radius of primary population centers (this is the length you need to connect UW to LA.
Near CA: (3-4)
UW, UCLA and USC (Oregon?).
Near to TX: (8-9)
A&M, Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, LSU, Arkansas, Iowa and Bama (Wiscy just out of range; Colorado sucks, but maybe?).
Near to FL: (12)
FSU, UF, Miami, UGA, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Tennessee, LSU, VTech, Ohio State, A&M
Near to GA: (14)
FSU, UF, Miami, UGA, Bama, Auburn, Clemson, Tennessee, LSU, VTech, Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Penn State, Notre Dame
Near to OH: (15)
Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State, Notre Dame, Wisconsin, Iowa, Tennessee, Auburn, Alabama, Arkansas, VTech, FSU, UF, UGA, Clemson
So - the teams in the south are competing with 3x the big time programs (or more) on average.
There are no fucking excuses.
Not saying we couldn't be better without some other changes so don't twist.
CA - 15.5 players per Tier I&II programs
TX - 7 players
FL - 3.8 players
GA - 2.4 players
OH - 1.5 players
I bolded it so you idiots could get the point.
THIRTY.
If this isn't a fucking crisis, I don't know what the fuck is.
The three schools that combined social media content, uniforms, branding, and just general marketing the best are Clemson, Ohio State, and Alabama hmmmm. The best is Clemson however.
The conference marketing as a whole is dreck. It has no identity and is all over the map. The tv stations suck, the social media accounts suck, everything sucks. Fire Larry Scott and please bring in more talented marketers and designers.
When kids from the West leave everyone says shit like "he's just gotta do what's best for him"
ASU is turrrrible.
OSU lol.
Cal eww.
USC is boring.
UCLA is decent.
Oregon is good but super gay (their brand is weak and faggy).
Stanford CHRYST.
Colorado bhahahahahaha.
Utah, the most mormon thing I've ever seen.
UofA uhhhh see WSU.
UW is alright but could be amazing. creative staff is unbelievable but their marketing department bahahaha christ. Don't we have the foster school or no?
If you think this shit doesn't matter in recruiting:
https://www.si.com/college-football/2016/12/28/ohio-state-clemson-social-media-fiesta-bowl-playoff-semifinal
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/18565611/meet-kenton-stufflebeam-ohio-state-buckeyes-secret-recruiting-weapon (Urban fucking gets it)
I'm saying the fans suck out west and let kids leave pac land
The pac sucks because the entire south part of the conference decided to be shitty at the same time.
And Stanford being good throws everything way out of whack