Told you...

Domicillo said:

creepycoug said:

DoogCourics said:

Southerndawg said:

Domicillo said:

Swaye said:

RaceBannon said:

Clemson is leveled up

2-2 the last 4 years. Two titles each. 55 wins each

Everyone is playing for third place

I hate being a defeatist loser but I am watching that game and thinking there is no realistic way to consistently beat teams like that. Not a knock on Washington there either. It's everyone. Ohio State would have been blown off the field by 40 at half, against either of them. I mean someone will come along and crack the code on them, but they are on a whole different level right now. FML

We don’t need to beat them next year nor should we expect to be close. But we should expect to keep leveling up the program in all aspects and maintaining the trajectory so that in 2-3 years we’re right about where Clemson was at 4 years ago when they made their first CFP.
For perspective:

https://twitter.com/domicillo11/status/1082499477875769344?s=21

"1. In 2008, Clemson finished the season tied for last in the ACC Atlantic Division. They hired their WR coach as their new head coach. He prioritized building his program around high character guys who he wanted to be prepared for success both in football and in life."

Swinney is recruiting at a much higher level than Petersen, or anyone else in the PAC for that matter. If the Huskies are to compete with programs like Clemson, they're going to have to take it up a notch and ditch some of the built for life BS.

You’re correct in the fact that Clemson is recruiting at a higher level than UW right now, but Clemson is also further along in the process so that’s an unfair statement at the moment. In regards to trajectory, UW is actually recruiting at the same pace as Clemson in regards to Pete through 5 years and Dabo through 5 years.

So Dom is correct in regards to his timeframe for UW to be where Clemson was when they started their run.

I covered it all here:

https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/980182#Comment_980182

But I’m sure like Jake Browning, you don’t reall read my stuff.

Washington is not getting the D line recruits that Clemson has been pulling in for years now. Don't kid yourself. That's a big, big, big piece of the puzzle. Clemson is getting first round D linemen in quantities now. You can be DBU of the west if you want, but that won't get it done against Bama or Clemson. To play with those guys, you need to be arguing about who the real D line U is, and not "of the west", which is stupid. And they are producing elite players at other positions, too, namely QB and WR.

Have you actually looked at our past two DL classes? Do you realize Clemson wanted both Tuitele and Bandes this year? Have you compared Dabo’s year 5 recruiting class with Pete’s?

Stupid would be saying bullshit without looking at any of the facts, doing any research or listening to people who’ve laid this out multiple times now.

P.S. our DL matched up perfectly well with Bama’s in 2016. We’re getting better guys than that in the pipeline now.

EwaDawg said:

Domicillo said:

creepycoug said:

DoogCourics said:

Southerndawg said:

Domicillo said:

Swaye said:

RaceBannon said:

Clemson is leveled up

2-2 the last 4 years. Two titles each. 55 wins each

Everyone is playing for third place

I hate being a defeatist loser but I am watching that game and thinking there is no realistic way to consistently beat teams like that. Not a knock on Washington there either. It's everyone. Ohio State would have been blown off the field by 40 at half, against either of them. I mean someone will come along and crack the code on them, but they are on a whole different level right now. FML

We don’t need to beat them next year nor should we expect to be close. But we should expect to keep leveling up the program in all aspects and maintaining the trajectory so that in 2-3 years we’re right about where Clemson was at 4 years ago when they made their first CFP.
For perspective:

https://twitter.com/domicillo11/status/1082499477875769344?s=21

"1. In 2008, Clemson finished the season tied for last in the ACC Atlantic Division. They hired their WR coach as their new head coach. He prioritized building his program around high character guys who he wanted to be prepared for success both in football and in life."

Swinney is recruiting at a much higher level than Petersen, or anyone else in the PAC for that matter. If the Huskies are to compete with programs like Clemson, they're going to have to take it up a notch and ditch some of the built for life BS.

You’re correct in the fact that Clemson is recruiting at a higher level than UW right now, but Clemson is also further along in the process so that’s an unfair statement at the moment. In regards to trajectory, UW is actually recruiting at the same pace as Clemson in regards to Pete through 5 years and Dabo through 5 years.

So Dom is correct in regards to his timeframe for UW to be where Clemson was when they started their run.

I covered it all here:

https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/comment/980182#Comment_980182

But I’m sure like Jake Browning, you don’t reall read my stuff.

Washington is not getting the D line recruits that Clemson has been pulling in for years now. Don't kid yourself. That's a big, big, big piece of the puzzle. Clemson is getting first round D linemen in quantities now. You can be DBU of the west if you want, but that won't get it done against Bama or Clemson. To play with those guys, you need to be arguing about who the real D line U is, and not "of the west", which is stupid. And they are producing elite players at other positions, too, namely QB and WR.

Have you actually looked at our past two DL classes? Do you realize Clemson wanted both Tuitele and Bandes this year? Have you compared Dabo’s year 5 recruiting class with Pete’s?

Stupid would be saying bullshit without looking at any of the facts, doing any research or listening to people who’ve laid this out multiple times now.

P.S. our DL matched up perfectly well with Bama’s in 2016. We’re getting better guys than that in the pipeline now.

Obvious answer is not no, but "HELL NO". Someone is speaking directly out of her ass, again. The more things change, the more they stay the same. You fuckers are just REAL SLOW to catch on.


HTH

RaceBannon said:

salemcoog said:

RaceBannon said:

Clemson is leveled up

2-2 the last 4 years. Two titles each. 55 wins each

Everyone is playing for third place

Clemson more than leveled up tonight.


The Revolution was televised.

What about when they lost 24-6 last year?

These teams are dead even in every number

Overall Bama still has 5 of 10 titles


Recency bias is as stupid as celebrating a tenth place finish

Wait