Our long national nightmare is over
Comments
-
Go Noles!
-
-
-
It's like it will be his for the taking.RaccoonHarry said:
-
And the runoff his posse will pull will be fucktastic. Do u think he will still make them watch him so he don't get accused of rape again?RaccoonHarry said:
He needs serious mentoring from Roethlisberger -
Why? Because it took a semi-hole to rape the state of Alabama with barely 13 seconds to go? What about incest football remains interesting to us west coasters..... if it ever was interesting? Perhaps the only mystery for next year will be how can the Tex-Okey clan get back into the annual gulf-shore circle jerk?dnc said:Praise be to Jameis
Somehow, I can't see a whole lot of difference between the SEC and the semi-SEC or wannabe-SEC, that the new four-redneck playoff won't continue to show us each year about this time. Hell, the incestuous south has even taken away the Rose Bowl again for their NCJ playoff and the Holiday Bowl will once more be the Pac-12's highest post season reward in 2014.
-
Engrish preeze. You are w/o question one of the most unintelligible mother fuckers on the boards.Tailgater said:
Why? Because it took a semi-hole to rape the state of Alabama with barely 13 seconds to go? What about incest football remains interesting to us west coasters..... if it ever was interesting? Perhaps the only mystery for next year will be how can the Tex-Okey clan get back into the annual gulf-shore circle jerk?dnc said:Praise be to Jameis
Somehow, I can't see a whole lot of difference between the SEC and the semi-SEC or wannabe-SEC, that the new four-redneck playoff won't continue to show us each year about this time. Hell, the incestuous south has even taken away the Rose Bowl again for their NCJ playoff and the Holiday Bowl will once more be the Pac-12's highest post season reward in 2014.
To the extent, and only to the the extent, that I can decipher even a small percentage of your hieroglyphics, your treatise on nothing goes nowhere.
Fuck aren't you dead yet? -
Well creepycunt, fuck you also.
-
I guess that answers my question.Tailgater said:Well creepycunt, fuck you also.
-
-
I agree there's not a difference but THEY think there's a difference.Tailgater said:
Why? Because it took a semi-hole to rape the state of Alabama with barely 13 seconds to go? What about incest football remains interesting to us west coasters..... if it ever was interesting? Perhaps the only mystery for next year will be how can the Tex-Okey clan get back into the annual gulf-shore circle jerk?dnc said:Praise be to Jameis
Somehow, I can't see a whole lot of difference between the SEC and the semi-SEC or wannabe-SEC, that the new four-redneck playoff won't continue to show us each year about this time. Hell, the incestuous south has even taken away the Rose Bowl again for their NCJ playoff and the Holiday Bowl will once more be the Pac-12's highest post season reward in 2014.
Anything that shuts up the SEC homers is great with me.
-
First, by adding one of these, "?", to the end of his questions. You should try writing good Engrish Shakespear.Tailgater said:
Get off the message board and spend time with your grand kids you stupid fuck.
-
for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
-
Because Auburn is a better.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
-
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.
-
I'm going to interject and make a pointedly doogish comment about this game. Refs - STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THE GAME in the last few minutes and let them battle it out and let the one who wants it most win the game instead of calling a mother fucking holding penalty and putting the fucking ball on the 2 mother fucking yard line. Fucking stupid refs.
-
It was obviously the right call. You don't change the way you call the game because of what the clock says. Interference is still interference.oregonblitzkrieg said:I'm going to interject and make a pointedly doogish comment about this game. Refs - STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THE GAME in the last few minutes and let them battle it out and let the one who wants it most win the game instead of calling a mother fucking holding penalty and putting the fucking ball on the 2 mother fucking yard line. Fucking stupid refs.
Swallowing your whistles is the refs deciding the game. -
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation. -
Are you fucking retarded? He tackled him on his route. It's 6 right there if he doesn't bring him down - that's why dbs interefere - because they're getting beat. Greene scores right there if the Aub db plays by the rules. Fuck even an Auburn homer wouldn't argue THAT call. He didn't just hold him - he mugged him.oregonblitzkrieg said:I'm going to interject and make a pointedly doogish comment about this game. Refs - STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THE GAME in the last few minutes and let them battle it out and let the one who wants it most win the game instead of calling a mother fucking holding penalty and putting the fucking ball on the 2 mother fucking yard line. Fucking stupid refs.
I could see your point if you were arguing the unsportsmanlike penalty. But if you got your way there would never be a completed pass in the final 5 minutes of any game. The dbs would all rape the wideouts w/ impunity.
Good God the internet. Think man.
-
Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.
Come on.
-
Determining who is #2 and who is #3 in the final poll doesn't matter.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation. -
If the question was, "Is Auburn a really good team that can play with anyone?," the answer is yes. The question was why did they deserve to be number 2 with two losses over a comparable one loss team? nobody has really answered that besides recycled "SEC is great," "Moral victory vs. FSU" and "They beat good SEC teams." If their SOS is number three and Michigan State's is 87th, sure I'll admit they have a strong argument.creepycoug said:
Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.
Come on. -
translation: Fire Marshall Bill was right and I can't come up with an argument so I will say it doesn't matterDardanus said:
Determining who is #2 and who is #3 in the final poll doesn't matter.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.
-
The argument has already been poasted AND it doesn't matter.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
translation: Fire Marshall Bill was right and I can't come up with an argument so I will say it doesn't matterDardanus said:
Determining who is #2 and who is #3 in the final poll doesn't matter.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.
Abundance wins again.
-
Auburn's schedule was 13th and MSU's was 51 per Sagarin.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If the question was, "Is Auburn a really good team that can play with anyone?," the answer is yes. The question was why did they deserve to be number 2 with two losses over a comparable one loss team? nobody has really answered that besides recycled "SEC is great," "Moral victory vs. FSU" and "They beat good SEC teams." If their SOS is number three and Michigan State's is 87th, sure I'll admit they have a strong argument.creepycoug said:
Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.
Come on.
And again, Florida State was clearly the #1 team in football, and Auburn took them to the final minute. They did nothing in that game to prove they did not deserve to be there. You can argue "moral victory" all you want to but isn't that all the difference between being ranked 2nd and 3rd is anyway?
If you want to build the case that Michigan State deserved to be in the championship game over Auburn go right ahead. Once Auburn got in (deservedly, IMO) and played that well against the clear best team they earned the final #2 ranking, IMO. And in the opinion of those who matter. -
If it's that big a deal, just wait a few years, buy yourself a banner that says "20xx Co-National Champs" hang it in the stadium. Nobody will care.dnc said:
Auburn's schedule was 13th and MSU's was 51 per Sagarin.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If the question was, "Is Auburn a really good team that can play with anyone?," the answer is yes. The question was why did they deserve to be number 2 with two losses over a comparable one loss team? nobody has really answered that besides recycled "SEC is great," "Moral victory vs. FSU" and "They beat good SEC teams." If their SOS is number three and Michigan State's is 87th, sure I'll admit they have a strong argument.creepycoug said:
Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.
Come on.
And again, Florida State was clearly the #1 team in football, and Auburn took them to the final minute. They did nothing in that game to prove they did not deserve to be there. You can argue "moral victory" all you want to but isn't that all the difference between being ranked 2nd and 3rd is anyway?
If you want to build the case that Michigan State deserved to be in the championship game over Auburn go right ahead. Once Auburn got in (deservedly, IMO) and played that well against the clear best team they earned the final #2 ranking, IMO. And in the opinion of those who matter. -
Tawdy! True?sarktastic said:
If it's that big a deal, just wait a few years, buy yourself a banner that says "20xx Co-National Champs" hang it in the stadium. Nobody will care.dnc said:
Auburn's schedule was 13th and MSU's was 51 per Sagarin.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
If the question was, "Is Auburn a really good team that can play with anyone?," the answer is yes. The question was why did they deserve to be number 2 with two losses over a comparable one loss team? nobody has really answered that besides recycled "SEC is great," "Moral victory vs. FSU" and "They beat good SEC teams." If their SOS is number three and Michigan State's is 87th, sure I'll admit they have a strong argument.creepycoug said:
Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the timednc said:
Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn
And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.
Come on.
And again, Florida State was clearly the #1 team in football, and Auburn took them to the final minute. They did nothing in that game to prove they did not deserve to be there. You can argue "moral victory" all you want to but isn't that all the difference between being ranked 2nd and 3rd is anyway?
If you want to build the case that Michigan State deserved to be in the championship game over Auburn go right ahead. Once Auburn got in (deservedly, IMO) and played that well against the clear best team they earned the final #2 ranking, IMO. And in the opinion of those who matter.
-
This.dnc said:
It was obviously the right call. You don't change the way you call the game because of what the clock says. Interference is still interference.oregonblitzkrieg said:I'm going to interject and make a pointedly doogish comment about this game. Refs - STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THE GAME in the last few minutes and let them battle it out and let the one who wants it most win the game instead of calling a mother fucking holding penalty and putting the fucking ball on the 2 mother fucking yard line. Fucking stupid refs.
Swallowing your whistles is the refs deciding the game.
Call the game the same way the whole way, or you are the NBA. -
If only the dumb fuck Georgia DBs didn't bail Auburn out, or Wazzu didn't coog, or Nick Saban didn't go full retard then this would all be mute.
Auburn was a team of destiny, but not even their evil SEC juju could overcome the jolliest rapist in the land after being spotted 18 points.
MSU #2 -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
This.dnc said:
It was obviously the right call. You don't change the way you call the game because of what the clock says. Interference is still interference.oregonblitzkrieg said:I'm going to interject and make a pointedly doogish comment about this game. Refs - STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THE GAME in the last few minutes and let them battle it out and let the one who wants it most win the game instead of calling a mother fucking holding penalty and putting the fucking ball on the 2 mother fucking yard line. Fucking stupid refs.
Swallowing your whistles is the refs deciding the game.
Call the game the same way the whole way, or you are the NBA.
The NFL playoffs and I just chuckled
