Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Our long national nightmare is over

135

Comments

  • Dardanus
    Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn

    Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.

    And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.

    Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the time
    Determining who is #2 and who is #3 in the final poll doesn't matter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,096 Standard Supporter
    creepycoug said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn

    Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.

    And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.

    Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the time
    Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???

    Come on.

    If the question was, "Is Auburn a really good team that can play with anyone?," the answer is yes. The question was why did they deserve to be number 2 with two losses over a comparable one loss team? nobody has really answered that besides recycled "SEC is great," "Moral victory vs. FSU" and "They beat good SEC teams." If their SOS is number three and Michigan State's is 87th, sure I'll admit they have a strong argument.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,096 Standard Supporter
    Dardanus said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn

    Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.

    And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.

    Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the time
    Determining who is #2 and who is #3 in the final poll doesn't matter.
    translation: Fire Marshall Bill was right and I can't come up with an argument so I will say it doesn't matter
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited January 2014
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Dardanus said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn

    Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.

    And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.

    Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the time
    Determining who is #2 and who is #3 in the final poll doesn't matter.
    translation: Fire Marshall Bill was right and I can't come up with an argument so I will say it doesn't matter
    The argument has already been poasted AND it doesn't matter.

    Abundance wins again.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    creepycoug said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn

    Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.

    And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.

    Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the time
    Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???

    Come on.

    If the question was, "Is Auburn a really good team that can play with anyone?," the answer is yes. The question was why did they deserve to be number 2 with two losses over a comparable one loss team? nobody has really answered that besides recycled "SEC is great," "Moral victory vs. FSU" and "They beat good SEC teams." If their SOS is number three and Michigan State's is 87th, sure I'll admit they have a strong argument.
    Auburn's schedule was 13th and MSU's was 51 per Sagarin.

    And again, Florida State was clearly the #1 team in football, and Auburn took them to the final minute. They did nothing in that game to prove they did not deserve to be there. You can argue "moral victory" all you want to but isn't that all the difference between being ranked 2nd and 3rd is anyway?

    If you want to build the case that Michigan State deserved to be in the championship game over Auburn go right ahead. Once Auburn got in (deservedly, IMO) and played that well against the clear best team they earned the final #2 ranking, IMO. And in the opinion of those who matter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    creepycoug said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn

    Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.

    And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.

    Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the time
    Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???

    Come on.

    If the question was, "Is Auburn a really good team that can play with anyone?," the answer is yes. The question was why did they deserve to be number 2 with two losses over a comparable one loss team? nobody has really answered that besides recycled "SEC is great," "Moral victory vs. FSU" and "They beat good SEC teams." If their SOS is number three and Michigan State's is 87th, sure I'll admit they have a strong argument.
    Auburn's schedule was 13th and MSU's was 51 per Sagarin.

    And again, Florida State was clearly the #1 team in football, and Auburn took them to the final minute. They did nothing in that game to prove they did not deserve to be there. You can argue "moral victory" all you want to but isn't that all the difference between being ranked 2nd and 3rd is anyway?

    If you want to build the case that Michigan State deserved to be in the championship game over Auburn go right ahead. Once Auburn got in (deservedly, IMO) and played that well against the clear best team they earned the final #2 ranking, IMO. And in the opinion of those who matter.
    If it's that big a deal, just wait a few years, buy yourself a banner that says "20xx Co-National Champs" hang it in the stadium. Nobody will care.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    sarktastic said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    creepycoug said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    dnc said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    for those that believe the SEC hype is a myth, explain why one loss Michigan State ( who just beat the number two and number four teams back to back) being ranked behind two loss Auburn

    Because dropping a team for losing in the final minute to the undisputed #1 team in the nation is fucktarded.

    And since two game runs seem to matter to you, Auburn just beat #1 and beat #5 before playing another #1. They deserved to be in that title game, therefore they're the #2 team in the nation.

    Wins and losses matter. One loss AQ team>>Two loss AQ team 99% of the time
    Is it really that hard to just say "yeah your probably right."???

    Come on.

    If the question was, "Is Auburn a really good team that can play with anyone?," the answer is yes. The question was why did they deserve to be number 2 with two losses over a comparable one loss team? nobody has really answered that besides recycled "SEC is great," "Moral victory vs. FSU" and "They beat good SEC teams." If their SOS is number three and Michigan State's is 87th, sure I'll admit they have a strong argument.
    Auburn's schedule was 13th and MSU's was 51 per Sagarin.

    And again, Florida State was clearly the #1 team in football, and Auburn took them to the final minute. They did nothing in that game to prove they did not deserve to be there. You can argue "moral victory" all you want to but isn't that all the difference between being ranked 2nd and 3rd is anyway?

    If you want to build the case that Michigan State deserved to be in the championship game over Auburn go right ahead. Once Auburn got in (deservedly, IMO) and played that well against the clear best team they earned the final #2 ranking, IMO. And in the opinion of those who matter.
    If it's that big a deal, just wait a few years, buy yourself a banner that says "20xx Co-National Champs" hang it in the stadium. Nobody will care.
    Tawdy! True?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    I'm going to interject and make a pointedly doogish comment about this game. Refs - STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THE GAME in the last few minutes and let them battle it out and let the one who wants it most win the game instead of calling a mother fucking holding penalty and putting the fucking ball on the 2 mother fucking yard line. Fucking stupid refs.

    It was obviously the right call. You don't change the way you call the game because of what the clock says. Interference is still interference.

    Swallowing your whistles is the refs deciding the game.
    This.

    Call the game the same way the whole way, or you are the NBA.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,792 Founders Club
    edited January 2014
    If only the dumb fuck Georgia DBs didn't bail Auburn out, or Wazzu didn't coog, or Nick Saban didn't go full retard then this would all be mute.

    Auburn was a team of destiny, but not even their evil SEC juju could overcome the jolliest rapist in the land after being spotted 18 points.

    MSU #2
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,457 Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    I'm going to interject and make a pointedly doogish comment about this game. Refs - STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THE GAME in the last few minutes and let them battle it out and let the one who wants it most win the game instead of calling a mother fucking holding penalty and putting the fucking ball on the 2 mother fucking yard line. Fucking stupid refs.

    It was obviously the right call. You don't change the way you call the game because of what the clock says. Interference is still interference.

    Swallowing your whistles is the refs deciding the game.
    This.

    Call the game the same way the whole way, or you are the NBA.

    The NFL playoffs and I just chuckled
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter