Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Who Develops Talent Best in the Pac-12?
Comments
-
Dennis_DeYoung said:
WHO GIVES A FUCKING FUCK? God are people here completely fucking retarded or what?Meek said:good chit, but some recruits and their families will always take the coffee cup in the hand versus two in the bush...some dads won't fly; just won't....some recruits will always want to be closer to home (Bama) and some recruits will always enjoy recruiting more than getting developed.
another way of saying i don't think we really have much more upside than we're hitting now.
just my opinion; don't twist.
SO WHAT - I UNDERSTAND WHAT KIDS DO YOU STUPID FUCKING MORON.
This is just DATA you idiot.
Also, @HillsboroDuck makes a good point, actually. That's why I got angry.
My excuse is that I was referencing @AIRWOLF's tweet and I forgot those time periods wouldn't be included. I originally meant it as a reply to his tweet.
Here's what @HillsboroDuck wanted. Feel free to tweet this one.
-
You should do a HH graph showing the expected fucktardness of HH denizens relative to their length of stay here ... just for fun.
-
I'm just here for Caps Lock Dennis
-
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class. -
Go fuck yourself.FremontTroll said:
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off. -
I laughed.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Go fuck yourself.FremontTroll said:
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off. -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
Go fuck yourself.FremontTroll said:
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY. -
OH SHIT I JUST PASSED MY JUNIOR YEAR STATS CLASS!!!! WOOOOO!!!!UW_Doog_Bot said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Go fuck yourself.FremontTroll said:
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY. -
Dennis_DeYoung said:
Go fuck yourself.FremontTroll said:
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
-
UW_Doog_Bot said:Dennis_DeYoung said:
Go fuck yourself.FremontTroll said:
What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.
Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.
But if you must know...
--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)
Then...
EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Like a fucking expected value calculation.
How the fuck did you think I was doing it?
I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY.
Not sure how any of this could be useful for PSAs......
