Washington state ends ‘racially biased’ death penalty. U mad, Hondo?
Comments
-
Who decides what’s a capital offense? Adultary? Failure to pay taxes? Not worshiping REAL god (i.e. the state), being a homo?..... careful.Sledog said:Commit the crime you deserve the punishment. Nothing racist about that at all.
-
I’m for limiting the governments ability to kill people. What does that make me?MikeDamone said:
Who decides what’s a capital offense? Adultary? Failure to pay taxes? Not worshiping REAL god (i.e. the state), being a homo?..... careful.Sledog said:Commit the crime you deserve the punishment. Nothing racist about that at all.
-
To be fair we all missed his trial since the democrats convicted him without oneThomasFremont said:
I must have missed his trial.RaceBannon said:
Brent Cavenaugh and I just chuckledThomasFremont said:
I get what you’re saying. But you don’t get to ignore the process for some people just because you’re pretty sure they did it.SFGbob said:
Why isn't the guy who shot up that church is South Carolina already dead? What issue exactly is he appealing his death sentence on? Lets expedite the execution of people like that and we'd save a lot of money.ThomasFremont said:
The method of execution isn’t the issue.SFGbob said:
A bullet to the back of the head immediately after sentencing is pretty fucking cheap.ThomasFremont said:
Or we could just lock them up forever and accomplish the same thing for cheaper. Nobody is saying to let these psychos loose in the streets.TurdBuffer said:
And men who most men would happily and gladly kill for what they did. But this state is Feminist Utopia, so I hope all its women feel much safer today than yesterday.Alexis said:I love the Seattle Times article that points out the death penalty is rayciss, and then shows a picture of the 8 guys currently on #deathrow. 5 of them are white.
I guess my issue is how sexist it is. All of them are men.
And on the off chance that one was mistakenly convicted, we can avoid murdering another innocent man.
Can I please get a link to one of these "innocent" men we've executed recently?
Love conservatives in this thread waving the right to an appeal.
Why is Polly Klaas killer still alive? There's no legitimate issue for him to be appealing his conviction on. We know he did it, it's not a case of mistaken identity and yet there he sits on "death" row, over 20 years later.
The fact that the government has executed the wrong people doesn’t seem to be bothering you though. I find that strange coming from a conservative.
You know Roberts opened an investigation against him, right?
Perjured himself before Congress too.
Big belly laughs.
Kind of the point that you missed very badly
And of course you have evidence of his perjury too
But a soft spot for killers -
Leftards seem to be ignorant of the historical origin of state imposed justice. Better to have the state impose justice rather than the family or the tribe. If someone killed a family member of mine – I would want ultimate justice. There it ends. Not having someone in jail filing appeal after appeal based on false arguments – like the death penalty is unconstitutional because its cruel and unusual punishment when the Constitution specifically authorizes the death penalty. Or down the line, leftards decide to that life in prison doesn’t really mean life in prison.
If a state want to make it illegal fine. Let them, but if the people of a state want justice imposed, then fine also. From a practical standpoint, I’d go with a no doubt standard. That gets the canard of all the innocent people getting offed by the state out of the way and cuts the appeals process way down also.
-
Convicted? When does his jail sentence start?RaceBannon said:
To be fair we all missed his trial since the democrats convicted him without oneThomasFremont said:
I must have missed his trial.RaceBannon said:
Brent Cavenaugh and I just chuckledThomasFremont said:
I get what you’re saying. But you don’t get to ignore the process for some people just because you’re pretty sure they did it.SFGbob said:
Why isn't the guy who shot up that church is South Carolina already dead? What issue exactly is he appealing his death sentence on? Lets expedite the execution of people like that and we'd save a lot of money.ThomasFremont said:
The method of execution isn’t the issue.SFGbob said:
A bullet to the back of the head immediately after sentencing is pretty fucking cheap.ThomasFremont said:
Or we could just lock them up forever and accomplish the same thing for cheaper. Nobody is saying to let these psychos loose in the streets.TurdBuffer said:
And men who most men would happily and gladly kill for what they did. But this state is Feminist Utopia, so I hope all its women feel much safer today than yesterday.Alexis said:I love the Seattle Times article that points out the death penalty is rayciss, and then shows a picture of the 8 guys currently on #deathrow. 5 of them are white.
I guess my issue is how sexist it is. All of them are men.
And on the off chance that one was mistakenly convicted, we can avoid murdering another innocent man.
Can I please get a link to one of these "innocent" men we've executed recently?
Love conservatives in this thread waving the right to an appeal.
Why is Polly Klaas killer still alive? There's no legitimate issue for him to be appealing his conviction on. We know he did it, it's not a case of mistaken identity and yet there he sits on "death" row, over 20 years later.
The fact that the government has executed the wrong people doesn’t seem to be bothering you though. I find that strange coming from a conservative.
You know Roberts opened an investigation against him, right?
Perjured himself before Congress too.
Big belly laughs.
Kind of the point that you missed very badly
And of course you have evidence of his perjury too
But a soft spot for killers
The point is he wasn’t in court defending himself. He was being reviewed for a lifetime appointment. And he cried like a little bitch about a calendar.
The evidence is on tape. A small lie is still a lie.
But if you want to be on the weak tummy cry baby angry guy grabby team, go for it.
-
Depends. Limiting or eliminating?ThomasFremont said:
I’m for limiting the governments ability to kill people. What does that make me?MikeDamone said:
Who decides what’s a capital offense? Adultary? Failure to pay taxes? Not worshiping REAL god (i.e. the state), being a homo?..... careful.Sledog said:Commit the crime you deserve the punishment. Nothing racist about that at all.
-
For American citizens, eliminating.MikeDamone said:
Depends. Limiting or eliminating?ThomasFremont said:
I’m for limiting the governments ability to kill people. What does that make me?MikeDamone said:
Who decides what’s a capital offense? Adultary? Failure to pay taxes? Not worshiping REAL god (i.e. the state), being a homo?..... careful.Sledog said:Commit the crime you deserve the punishment. Nothing racist about that at all.
Others? Limiting.
There’s bad people out there, and we still have to kill them sometimes.
-
You seem to be strugglingThomasFremont said:
Convicted? When does his jail sentence start?RaceBannon said:
To be fair we all missed his trial since the democrats convicted him without oneThomasFremont said:
I must have missed his trial.RaceBannon said:
Brent Cavenaugh and I just chuckledThomasFremont said:
I get what you’re saying. But you don’t get to ignore the process for some people just because you’re pretty sure they did it.SFGbob said:
Why isn't the guy who shot up that church is South Carolina already dead? What issue exactly is he appealing his death sentence on? Lets expedite the execution of people like that and we'd save a lot of money.ThomasFremont said:
The method of execution isn’t the issue.SFGbob said:
A bullet to the back of the head immediately after sentencing is pretty fucking cheap.ThomasFremont said:
Or we could just lock them up forever and accomplish the same thing for cheaper. Nobody is saying to let these psychos loose in the streets.TurdBuffer said:
And men who most men would happily and gladly kill for what they did. But this state is Feminist Utopia, so I hope all its women feel much safer today than yesterday.Alexis said:I love the Seattle Times article that points out the death penalty is rayciss, and then shows a picture of the 8 guys currently on #deathrow. 5 of them are white.
I guess my issue is how sexist it is. All of them are men.
And on the off chance that one was mistakenly convicted, we can avoid murdering another innocent man.
Can I please get a link to one of these "innocent" men we've executed recently?
Love conservatives in this thread waving the right to an appeal.
Why is Polly Klaas killer still alive? There's no legitimate issue for him to be appealing his conviction on. We know he did it, it's not a case of mistaken identity and yet there he sits on "death" row, over 20 years later.
The fact that the government has executed the wrong people doesn’t seem to be bothering you though. I find that strange coming from a conservative.
You know Roberts opened an investigation against him, right?
Perjured himself before Congress too.
Big belly laughs.
Kind of the point that you missed very badly
And of course you have evidence of his perjury too
But a soft spot for killers
The point is he wasn’t in court defending himself. He was being reviewed for a lifetime appointment. And he cried like a little bitch about a calendar.
The evidence is on tape. A small lie is still a lie.
But if you want to be on the weak tummy cry baby angry guy grabby team, go for it.
I guess when you care more about "justice" for scum killers than you do about a fair hearing for a judge it gets like that
When do you plan on letting go of your rage over Cavenaugh?
Or Trump?
Time to move on Tommy. -
Then that makes you a statist.ThomasFremont said:
For American citizens, eliminating.MikeDamone said:
Depends. Limiting or eliminating?ThomasFremont said:
I’m for limiting the governments ability to kill people. What does that make me?MikeDamone said:
Who decides what’s a capital offense? Adultary? Failure to pay taxes? Not worshiping REAL god (i.e. the state), being a homo?..... careful.Sledog said:Commit the crime you deserve the punishment. Nothing racist about that at all.
Others? Limiting.
There’s bad people out there, and we still have to kill them sometimes. -
I think locking killers up for life is sufficient justice. Killing them is some eye for an eye bullshit that the Bible taught me was bad. Give it a read some time.RaceBannon said:
You seem to be strugglingThomasFremont said:
Convicted? When does his jail sentence start?RaceBannon said:
To be fair we all missed his trial since the democrats convicted him without oneThomasFremont said:
I must have missed his trial.RaceBannon said:
Brent Cavenaugh and I just chuckledThomasFremont said:
I get what you’re saying. But you don’t get to ignore the process for some people just because you’re pretty sure they did it.SFGbob said:
Why isn't the guy who shot up that church is South Carolina already dead? What issue exactly is he appealing his death sentence on? Lets expedite the execution of people like that and we'd save a lot of money.ThomasFremont said:
The method of execution isn’t the issue.SFGbob said:
A bullet to the back of the head immediately after sentencing is pretty fucking cheap.ThomasFremont said:
Or we could just lock them up forever and accomplish the same thing for cheaper. Nobody is saying to let these psychos loose in the streets.TurdBuffer said:
And men who most men would happily and gladly kill for what they did. But this state is Feminist Utopia, so I hope all its women feel much safer today than yesterday.Alexis said:I love the Seattle Times article that points out the death penalty is rayciss, and then shows a picture of the 8 guys currently on #deathrow. 5 of them are white.
I guess my issue is how sexist it is. All of them are men.
And on the off chance that one was mistakenly convicted, we can avoid murdering another innocent man.
Can I please get a link to one of these "innocent" men we've executed recently?
Love conservatives in this thread waving the right to an appeal.
Why is Polly Klaas killer still alive? There's no legitimate issue for him to be appealing his conviction on. We know he did it, it's not a case of mistaken identity and yet there he sits on "death" row, over 20 years later.
The fact that the government has executed the wrong people doesn’t seem to be bothering you though. I find that strange coming from a conservative.
You know Roberts opened an investigation against him, right?
Perjured himself before Congress too.
Big belly laughs.
Kind of the point that you missed very badly
And of course you have evidence of his perjury too
But a soft spot for killers
The point is he wasn’t in court defending himself. He was being reviewed for a lifetime appointment. And he cried like a little bitch about a calendar.
The evidence is on tape. A small lie is still a lie.
But if you want to be on the weak tummy cry baby angry guy grabby team, go for it.
I guess when you care more about "justice" for scum killers than you do about a fair hearing for a judge it gets like that
When do you plan on letting go of your rage over Cavenaugh?
Or Trump?
Time to move on Tommy.
What was unfair about the hearing? He isn’t entitled to be on the Supreme Court.



