Hawk Talk
Comments
-
Nice cherry picking of games as always. What about the Monday Night game vs the Saints when both teams were going for the #1 seed? What about the big SNF game at home vs the 49ers?topdawgnc said:The San Fran game and today's game is proof the this Hawks team can't win, when it counts.
The Seahawks have some flaws but so does every NFL team. -
it's more and more noticeable that the dumbfucks from Doogman have migrated over here.
-
not to mention week 1, also in arizona.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Nice cherry picking of games as always. What about the Monday Night game vs the Saints when both teams were going for the #1 seed? What about the big SNF game at home vs the 49ers?topdawgnc said:The San Fran game and today's game is proof the this Hawks team can't win, when it counts.
The Seahawks have some flaws but so does every NFL team.
Furthermore everyone in the NFL sucks this year, seahawks are still one of the favorites
-
Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him. -
oh right.
the national tv game with 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFC was not pressure packed.
SF and AZ were not must win games.
HTH -
I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.
If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.
How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do? -
BlowItUp said:
oh right.
the national tv game with 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFC was not pressure packed.
SF and AZ were not must win games.
HTH
Really ... today wasn't a must win game. Win and wrap it all up and let your starters rest next week.
SF ... winning a late season game against a division team breathing down your neck isn't must win ...
I agree ...
it's more and more noticeable that the dumbfucks from Doogman have migrated over here. -
"must win" games imply that they had something to lose.
what did they lose by not winning today?
they still control everything.
-
You really are pressing man. The Saints game had they lost then the 49ers would be breathing down their necks.topdawgnc said:BlowItUp said:oh right.
the national tv game with 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFC was not pressure packed.
SF and AZ were not must win games.
HTH
Really ... today wasn't a must win game. Win and wrap it all up and let your starters rest next week.
SF ... winning a late season game against a division team breathing down your neck isn't must win ...
I agree ...
it's more and more noticeable that the dumbfucks from Doogman have migrated over here.
At the time of the 49ers game the Seahawks were 11-1 while the 49ers were 8-4 so how was that a must win again?
If we are going to cherry pick games to fit your agenda might as well say the Colts game was a big game too.
The Saints game was easily the biggest game of the season. -
TopDawgnc is high
-
Hi there. They didn't have to win either of those must win games. They still control the #1 seed.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
Get the fuck out of here. -
but hey @topdawgnc nice logic, as always.
-
When did Auburndoog hack topdoognc's account?
-
If Seattle is coasting ...He_Needs_More_Time said:
I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.
If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.
How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
Will they rest the starters next week?
If coasting ... have they wrapped it up or could Carolina or NO still snag it.
Wash the sand out of your vag ... the Seahawks have choked twice in two of the past three games ... no reason to lose to AZ with it all on the line.
Shades of Texas in the Rose Bowl. -
They didn't have to win this week. It's a costly loss, but they clinch home field with a win against the Rams next week. A fired up team at home playing against Kellen Clemens. I like Seattle in that one. If we lose next week, these doom and gloom posts will be spot on, but right now, it's an overreaction over a loss to a team that is 7-1 in its past 8 games. Next week is the must win game. Seahawks played like shit on offense, Turbin fumbled without being touched, didn't make plays when it counted, and lost a game they should have won.
-
TopDawgNC is MikeLeachClockManagementFS in this thread
-
Them choking and them not winning big games is two different things.topdawgnc said:
If Seattle is coasting ...He_Needs_More_Time said:
I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.
If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.
How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
Will they rest the starters next week?
If coasting ... have they wrapped it up or could Carolina or NO still snag it.
Wash the sand out of your vag ... the Seahawks have choked twice in two of the past three games ... no reason to lose to AZ with it all on the line.
Shades of Texas in the Rose Bowl.
I'm not happy they lost but to say this proves they can't win must win games is fucking stupid. -
We shall see.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Them choking and them not winning big games is two different things.topdawgnc said:
If Seattle is coasting ...He_Needs_More_Time said:
I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.
If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.
How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
Will they rest the starters next week?
If coasting ... have they wrapped it up or could Carolina or NO still snag it.
Wash the sand out of your vag ... the Seahawks have choked twice in two of the past three games ... no reason to lose to AZ with it all on the line.
Shades of Texas in the Rose Bowl.
I'm not happy they lost but to say this proves they can't win must win games is fucking stupid. -
yeah they really had to win those games. They lost both and they are still in the drivers seat. Not comprehending your logic here.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him. -
The Rams game is the first "must-win" game IMO since the Saints game.
It's not a "must-win" if you lose and nothing impacts you. Seattle is still in the drivers seat while had they lost the Saints game they wouldn't have been. -
Will the starters be resting next week?dhdawg said:
yeah they really had to win those games. They lost both and they are still in the drivers seat. Not comprehending your logic here.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
What would have happened if today was a victory ... instead of a loss? -
I hate resting the starters, and with a bye week in the first round of the playoffs, I would be concerned about that. Today was a bad loss, but I am glad we have to play the starters next week.topdawgnc said:
Will the starters be resting next week?dhdawg said:
yeah they really had to win those games. They lost both and they are still in the drivers seat. Not comprehending your logic here.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
What would have happened if today was a victory ... instead of a loss?
-
Do you know what a "must-win" game is?topdawgnc said:
Will the starters be resting next week?dhdawg said:
yeah they really had to win those games. They lost both and they are still in the drivers seat. Not comprehending your logic here.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
What would have happened if today was a victory ... instead of a loss?
This loss is an inconvenience for sure since starters have to play next week(Pete btw said he was going to play his starters regardless).
However, it changes NOTHING! If the Hawks win they have homefield or if the 49ers lose just one game the Seahawks have homefield advantage.
Had they lost the MNF game to the Saints at the time the Saints would have been in the drivers seat, I'd argue week 1 at Carolina was a big one, thursday night at Arizona was big, as was vs SF on SNF.
Then again the Seahawks won those games so it doesn't fit your narrative. BTW, when the Seahawks defeated the Saints they clinched a playoff spot as well. -
They lost to two teams who had their backs against the wall. I'm not excusing it, and I wish they could fire Bevell right now, but at the same time, they haven't lost a must win game since the Falcon game last year.
-
Their primetime record under Carroll says it all. The only "big" game they've lost was the Falcons game last year as their regular season losses were to terrible teams minus the 49ers on thursday night.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:They lost to two teams who had their backs against the wall. I'm not excusing it, and I wish they could fire Bevell right now, but at the same time, they haven't lost a must win game since the Falcon game last year.
He's just cherry picking to make some made up point in his head.
-
I'll say I'm wrong if they are holding a trophy in NYC ... fuck if they even make it there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Their primetime record under Carroll says it all. The only "big" game they've lost was the Falcons game last year as their regular season losses were to terrible teams minus the 49ers on thursday night.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:They lost to two teams who had their backs against the wall. I'm not excusing it, and I wish they could fire Bevell right now, but at the same time, they haven't lost a must win game since the Falcon game last year.
He's just cherry picking to make some made up point in his head.
Just calling my shot ...
Don't book a February flight to NYC.
I had forgotten about the Falcons ... -
That Arizona defense might be the leagues best right now.
-
Them winning the SB or not has nothing to do with your fucktarded logic. Nice of you to try and shift the argument.topdawgnc said:
I'll say I'm wrong if they are holding a trophy in NYC ... fuck if they even make it there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Their primetime record under Carroll says it all. The only "big" game they've lost was the Falcons game last year as their regular season losses were to terrible teams minus the 49ers on thursday night.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:They lost to two teams who had their backs against the wall. I'm not excusing it, and I wish they could fire Bevell right now, but at the same time, they haven't lost a must win game since the Falcon game last year.
He's just cherry picking to make some made up point in his head.
Just calling my shot ...
Don't book a February flight to NYC.
I had forgotten about the Falcons ...
Fuck, I didn't realize I'd end up having an argument on here similar to arguing with MykFS. -
My logic is ... today they had to win to lock up the #1 seed and home field advantage ... they didn't do that.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Them winning the SB or not has nothing to do with your fucktarded logic. Nice of you to try and shift the argument.topdawgnc said:
I'll say I'm wrong if they are holding a trophy in NYC ... fuck if they even make it there.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Their primetime record under Carroll says it all. The only "big" game they've lost was the Falcons game last year as their regular season losses were to terrible teams minus the 49ers on thursday night.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:They lost to two teams who had their backs against the wall. I'm not excusing it, and I wish they could fire Bevell right now, but at the same time, they haven't lost a must win game since the Falcon game last year.
He's just cherry picking to make some made up point in his head.
Just calling my shot ...
Don't book a February flight to NYC.
I had forgotten about the Falcons ...
Fuck, I didn't realize I'd end up having an argument on here similar to arguing with MykFS.
Two weeks ago they had to win to give breathing room ... they didn't do that.
If yours differs, ok ... nothing wrong with that.
No reason Arizona should have come to Seattle and won. None.
After watching the St. Louis game earlier this week ... I'm not so sure they can win on Sunday, hope I am wrong.
I would not bet they make it to NYC based on SF and AZ game.
if you disagree ... ok. -
Resting starters in Week 17 when you have a bye week is Peyton Manning Fucking Stupid.topdawgnc said:
Will the starters be resting next week?dhdawg said:
yeah they really had to win those games. They lost both and they are still in the drivers seat. Not comprehending your logic here.topdawgnc said:Facts hurt.
The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.
The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...
When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.
When they HAD to win today ... they lost.
Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
What would have happened if today was a victory ... instead of a loss?
Get the fuck out.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
