Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Hawk Talk

topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Name Dropper
in Hardcore Husky Board
The San Fran game and today's game is proof the this Hawks team can't win, when it counts.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment blah
    topdawgnc said:

    The San Fran game and today's game is proof the this Hawks team can't win, when it counts.

    Nice cherry picking of games as always. What about the Monday Night game vs the Saints when both teams were going for the #1 seed? What about the big SNF game at home vs the 49ers?

    The Seahawks have some flaws but so does every NFL team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    topdawgnc said:

    The San Fran game and today's game is proof the this Hawks team can't win, when it counts.

    Nice cherry picking of games as always. What about the Monday Night game vs the Saints when both teams were going for the #1 seed? What about the big SNF game at home vs the 49ers?

    The Seahawks have some flaws but so does every NFL team.
    not to mention week 1, also in arizona.
    Furthermore everyone in the NFL sucks this year, seahawks are still one of the favorites
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Name Dropper
    Facts hurt.

    The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.

    The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...

    When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.

    When they HAD to win today ... they lost.

    Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BlowItUpBlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    oh right.

    the national tv game with 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFC was not pressure packed.

    SF and AZ were not must win games.

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment blah
    topdawgnc said:

    Facts hurt.

    The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.

    The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...

    When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.

    When they HAD to win today ... they lost.

    Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.

    I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.

    After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.

    If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.

    How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Name Dropper
    BlowItUp said:

    oh right.

    the national tv game with 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFC was not pressure packed.

    SF and AZ were not must win games.

    HTH


    Really ... today wasn't a must win game. Win and wrap it all up and let your starters rest next week.

    SF ... winning a late season game against a division team breathing down your neck isn't must win ...

    I agree ...
    it's more and more noticeable that the dumbfucks from Doogman have migrated over here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BlowItUpBlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    edited December 2013
    "must win" games imply that they had something to lose.

    what did they lose by not winning today?

    they still control everything.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment blah
    topdawgnc said:

    BlowItUp said:

    oh right.

    the national tv game with 2 of the top 3 teams in the NFC was not pressure packed.

    SF and AZ were not must win games.

    HTH


    Really ... today wasn't a must win game. Win and wrap it all up and let your starters rest next week.

    SF ... winning a late season game against a division team breathing down your neck isn't must win ...

    I agree ...
    it's more and more noticeable that the dumbfucks from Doogman have migrated over here.
    You really are pressing man. The Saints game had they lost then the 49ers would be breathing down their necks.

    At the time of the 49ers game the Seahawks were 11-1 while the 49ers were 8-4 so how was that a must win again?

    If we are going to cherry pick games to fit your agenda might as well say the Colts game was a big game too.

    The Saints game was easily the biggest game of the season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,890
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    TopDawgnc is high
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BlowItUpBlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    but hey @topdawgnc nice logic, as always.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    When did Auburndoog hack topdoognc's account?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Name Dropper
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Facts hurt.

    The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.

    The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...

    When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.

    When they HAD to win today ... they lost.

    Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.

    I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.

    After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.

    If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.

    How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
    If Seattle is coasting ...

    Will they rest the starters next week?

    If coasting ... have they wrapped it up or could Carolina or NO still snag it.

    Wash the sand out of your vag ... the Seahawks have choked twice in two of the past three games ... no reason to lose to AZ with it all on the line.

    Shades of Texas in the Rose Bowl.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited December 2013
    They didn't have to win this week. It's a costly loss, but they clinch home field with a win against the Rams next week. A fired up team at home playing against Kellen Clemens. I like Seattle in that one. If we lose next week, these doom and gloom posts will be spot on, but right now, it's an overreaction over a loss to a team that is 7-1 in its past 8 games. Next week is the must win game. Seahawks played like shit on offense, Turbin fumbled without being touched, didn't make plays when it counted, and lost a game they should have won.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    BlowItUpBlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment
    TopDawgNC is MikeLeachClockManagementFS in this thread
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment blah
    topdawgnc said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Facts hurt.

    The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.

    The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...

    When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.

    When they HAD to win today ... they lost.

    Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.

    I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.

    After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.

    If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.

    How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
    If Seattle is coasting ...

    Will they rest the starters next week?

    If coasting ... have they wrapped it up or could Carolina or NO still snag it.

    Wash the sand out of your vag ... the Seahawks have choked twice in two of the past three games ... no reason to lose to AZ with it all on the line.

    Shades of Texas in the Rose Bowl.
    Them choking and them not winning big games is two different things.

    I'm not happy they lost but to say this proves they can't win must win games is fucking stupid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Name Dropper
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    topdawgnc said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Facts hurt.

    The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.

    The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...

    When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.

    When they HAD to win today ... they lost.

    Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.

    I stopped listening after that. If the Hawks lose that game that puts the Saints in the drivers seat to win the #1 seed.

    After that Seattle could just coast for the #1 seed which they are doing.

    If anything the Rams game is the first big game far as importance on winning since the Saints game.

    How is the 49ers game so big if they lost and didn't change their place in the standings or what they needed to do?
    If Seattle is coasting ...

    Will they rest the starters next week?

    If coasting ... have they wrapped it up or could Carolina or NO still snag it.

    Wash the sand out of your vag ... the Seahawks have choked twice in two of the past three games ... no reason to lose to AZ with it all on the line.

    Shades of Texas in the Rose Bowl.
    Them choking and them not winning big games is two different things.

    I'm not happy they lost but to say this proves they can't win must win games is fucking stupid.
    We shall see.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker First Anniversary
    topdawgnc said:

    Facts hurt.

    The New Orleans game was not pressure packed.

    The big SNF game ... at the start of the year ... yes ... huge ...

    When they HAD to win in SF ... they lost.

    When they HAD to win today ... they lost.

    Next week tells the tale ... St. Louis gave them all they could handle earlier in the year ... Let's see if Neil Lomax still has some of that St. Louis magic left in him.

    yeah they really had to win those games. They lost both and they are still in the drivers seat. Not comprehending your logic here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment blah
    The Rams game is the first "must-win" game IMO since the Saints game.

    It's not a "must-win" if you lose and nothing impacts you. Seattle is still in the drivers seat while had they lost the Saints game they wouldn't have been.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.