Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kavanaugh Nomination: Full Speed Ahead – Lunch Alert!

1356

Comments

  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Swaye said:

    This whole thing just looks like a desperate Hail Mary 11th hour Feinstein led carnival ride to fuck over a very qualified Judge. It's bullshit.

    Like Dabone said, elections have consequences. Stop running power hungry morons like Hillary and you wouldn't have had to deal with this. A loaf of bread could have beaten the Trumpster.

    White bread.

    America would never elect dark bread. Don't even get me started on that zebra bread - pumpernickle.

    And not a bagel with a hole in it.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
  • YellowSnowYellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 33,796
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
    I don't follow? If the Dems controlled the Senate as was the case when Obama took office, then Obama would have been able to get his nominee on the court. ALL elections matter.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes

    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
    I don't follow? If the Dems controlled the Senate as was the case when Obama took office, then Obama would have been able to get his nominee on the court. ALL elections matter.
    There's truth in that however who nominates the judge?
  • USMChawkUSMChawk Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,796
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited September 2018
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
    I don't follow? If the Dems controlled the Senate as was the case when Obama took office, then Obama would have been able to get his nominee on the court. ALL elections matter.
    There's truth in that however who nominates the judge?
    I’ll play along. The President nominates the Justice. Now it’s your turn. Who confirms the nomination?
  • Dude61Dude61 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,226
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    The Democrat's know that Kavanaugh will be confirmed. This entire show is to give Democrat Senators at risk in red states cover for voting no on Kavanaugh.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,657
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 30,477
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    It's all a big hoax. If the ends justify the means comrade.
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,220
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    It's a hearing, not a legal case. Since there is no jury to hear the he said/she said, I don't know if it matters all that much who goes first. I don't see anyone's mind being changed regardless.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
    I don't follow? If the Dems controlled the Senate as was the case when Obama took office, then Obama would have been able to get his nominee on the court. ALL elections matter.
    There's truth in that however who nominates the judge?
    I’ll play along. The President nominates the Justice. Now it’s your turn. Who confirms the nomination?
    Of course the Senate. And it was brilliant for the Republicans to focus on supreme Court once it became clear Trump would win the nomination. And it was brilliant for Republicans to block the nomination until after the election betting the backlash for stonewalling would be less than the enthusiasm from the base to have conservative judges. And it was smart of Trump to present his list of judges 6 months before the election. And dumb of Hillary to assume it was her destiny to be president. Which in turn hurt liberal voter turnout for Congress.



    Oh yeah and dumb of Democrats to only have Bernie and Hillary as a choice.


    Where was I again? Oh yeah the DNC is fucktarded.
  • USMChawkUSMChawk Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,796
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Swaye's Wigwam
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 41,657
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    dflea said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    It's a hearing, not a legal case. Since there is no jury to hear the he said/she said, I don't know if it matters all that much who goes first. I don't see anyone's mind being changed regardless.
    So Kavanaugh is supposed to defend himself against what he thinks some gal might say?

    No. Sorry. It don’t work that way.
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,735
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,044
    First Anniversary Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?
Sign In or Register to comment.