But you Zimmerman apologists really can't see that he provoked, escalated and caused the confrontation? And you actually claim Zimmerman wasn't stalking the kid? Amazing.
No one is nominating Zimmerman as citizen of the year. But he clearly was a better person that Trademark on the day Trademark died. You do have a right not to have your head beaten into the ground. Trademark was the stereotypical thug and embraced it. Look, it was the MSM that wanted to make Trademark, wannabe astronaut, a national hero killed by a white Hispanic. They lied and said Zimmerman wasn’t injured. They lied and said he said “coons”. They lied about Trademark not going home and then coming back. They lied about Trademark’s size. Zimmerman isn’t my hero, but I’m happy to deal with the actual truth of national matters. To many on the left, Trademark is the hero. I find that offensive and self-defeating. Well meaning (not really, but let’s pretend) leftards enabled Trademark’s behavior for several years. A 30 year old cowardly fat fuck picked a fight with a 17 year old kid and lost. He murdered the minor in response. You and Gay Bob enable that behavior. Actually the people like yourself who make excuses for criminal assault in response to someone legally following someone in public are the ones that enable this behavior.When is it ever okay to break someone’s nose and beat their head against the sidewalk just because they followed you for a few minutes? When is it ok to murder someone because they broke your nose? You’ve obviously never been in a fight. Cowards never have.
No one is nominating Zimmerman as citizen of the year. But he clearly was a better person that Trademark on the day Trademark died. You do have a right not to have your head beaten into the ground. Trademark was the stereotypical thug and embraced it. Look, it was the MSM that wanted to make Trademark, wannabe astronaut, a national hero killed by a white Hispanic. They lied and said Zimmerman wasn’t injured. They lied and said he said “coons”. They lied about Trademark not going home and then coming back. They lied about Trademark’s size. Zimmerman isn’t my hero, but I’m happy to deal with the actual truth of national matters. To many on the left, Trademark is the hero. I find that offensive and self-defeating. Well meaning (not really, but let’s pretend) leftards enabled Trademark’s behavior for several years. A 30 year old cowardly fat fuck picked a fight with a 17 year old kid and lost. He murdered the minor in response. You and Gay Bob enable that behavior. Actually the people like yourself who make excuses for criminal assault in response to someone legally following someone in public are the ones that enable this behavior.When is it ever okay to break someone’s nose and beat their head against the sidewalk just because they followed you for a few minutes?
No one is nominating Zimmerman as citizen of the year. But he clearly was a better person that Trademark on the day Trademark died. You do have a right not to have your head beaten into the ground. Trademark was the stereotypical thug and embraced it. Look, it was the MSM that wanted to make Trademark, wannabe astronaut, a national hero killed by a white Hispanic. They lied and said Zimmerman wasn’t injured. They lied and said he said “coons”. They lied about Trademark not going home and then coming back. They lied about Trademark’s size. Zimmerman isn’t my hero, but I’m happy to deal with the actual truth of national matters. To many on the left, Trademark is the hero. I find that offensive and self-defeating. Well meaning (not really, but let’s pretend) leftards enabled Trademark’s behavior for several years. A 30 year old cowardly fat fuck picked a fight with a 17 year old kid and lost. He murdered the minor in response. You and Gay Bob enable that behavior.
No one is nominating Zimmerman as citizen of the year. But he clearly was a better person that Trademark on the day Trademark died. You do have a right not to have your head beaten into the ground. Trademark was the stereotypical thug and embraced it. Look, it was the MSM that wanted to make Trademark, wannabe astronaut, a national hero killed by a white Hispanic. They lied and said Zimmerman wasn’t injured. They lied and said he said “coons”. They lied about Trademark not going home and then coming back. They lied about Trademark’s size. Zimmerman isn’t my hero, but I’m happy to deal with the actual truth of national matters. To many on the left, Trademark is the hero. I find that offensive and self-defeating. Well meaning (not really, but let’s pretend) leftards enabled Trademark’s behavior for several years.
No one is nominating Zimmerman as citizen of the year. But he clearly was a better person that Trademark on the day Trademark died. You do have a right not to have your head beaten into the ground. Trademark was the stereotypical thug and embraced it. Look, it was the MSM that wanted to make Trademark, wannabe astronaut, a national hero killed by a white Hispanic. They lied and said Zimmerman wasn’t injured. They lied and said he said “coons”. They lied about Trademark not going home and then coming back. They lied about Trademark’s size. Zimmerman isn’t my hero, but I’m happy to deal with the actual truth of national matters. To many on the left, Trademark is the hero. I find that offensive and self-defeating. Well meaning (not really, but let’s pretend) leftards enabled Trademark’s behavior for several years. A 30 year old cowardly fat fuck picked a fight with a 17 year old kid and lost. He murdered the minor in response. You and Gay Bob enable that behavior. Actually the people like yourself who make excuses for criminal assault in response to someone legally following someone in public are the ones that enable this behavior.When is it ever okay to break someone’s nose and beat their head against the sidewalk just because they followed you for a few minutes? When is it ok to murder someone because they broke your nose? You’ve obviously never been in a fight. Cowards never have. Yeah, Zimmerman should have taken that ass kicking like a good white hispanic, He had to know that Trademark was a kid and an astronaut wannabe and that he would have stopped before too long
But you Zimmerman apologists really can't see that he provoked, escalated and caused the confrontation? And you actually claim Zimmerman wasn't stalking the kid? Amazing. So if someone was watching me and trying to follow me I would be concerned. I have a cell phone I'd probably call the police. I wouldn't beat the shit out of them and repeatedly slam their head onto the concrete without some other mitigating factor. I could really care less about Zimmerman. But being a fat nosy neighborhood watch guy isn't reason enough.
I feel responsible for exposing this thread to Cirrho's full-blown AIDS. My bad.
But you Zimmerman apologists really can't see that he provoked, escalated and caused the confrontation? And you actually claim Zimmerman wasn't stalking the kid? Amazing. So if someone was watching me and trying to follow me I would be concerned. I have a cell phone I'd probably call the police. I wouldn't beat the shit out of them and repeatedly slam their head onto the concrete without some other mitigating factor. I could really care less about Zimmerman. But being a fat nosy neighborhood watch guy isn't reason enough. Well, first of all, you're not 17.
But you Zimmerman apologists really can't see that he provoked, escalated and caused the confrontation? And you actually claim Zimmerman wasn't stalking the kid? Amazing. So if someone was watching me and trying to follow me I would be concerned. I have a cell phone I'd probably call the police. I wouldn't beat the shit out of them and repeatedly slam their head onto the concrete without some other mitigating factor. I could really care less about Zimmerman. But being a fat nosy neighborhood watch guy isn't reason enough. Well, first of all, you're not 17. Second of all, it's easy to talk about it in the abstract. If you actually dig into the facts of this case, it's not as antiseptic as Bob tries to make it seem. He was tracking him in his car, and when the kid tried to shake him, he got out of his car (thus escalating the situation) and tried to give chase. The tone of his voice and the words he used, on tape, express a state of agitation and anger. Martin's conversation with his girlfriend expressed a state of concern, which is not unreasonable because he's a kid and he's being stalked by an adult he doesn't know for reasons he doesn't understand.Other than Zimmerman not being very good at fighting and the bullet hole in Martin's chese, literally everything else is open to speculation. But if it were your kid, would you not wonder WTF happened and take Zimmerman to task for stalking and then chasing your kid? For not just letting him go? Your kid. Walking alone at night. Unarmed. Doing nothing. Grown man following in a car. Your kid runs. Adult guy gives chase. Altercation happens, and, good for him, kid handles himself. But dummy has a gun and shoots him.You sure that situation sits well with you?
But you Zimmerman apologists really can't see that he provoked, escalated and caused the confrontation? And you actually claim Zimmerman wasn't stalking the kid? Amazing. So if someone was watching me and trying to follow me I would be concerned. I have a cell phone I'd probably call the police. I wouldn't beat the shit out of them and repeatedly slam their head onto the concrete without some other mitigating factor. I could really care less about Zimmerman. But being a fat nosy neighborhood watch guy isn't reason enough. Well, first of all, you're not 17. Second of all, it's easy to talk about it in the abstract. If you actually dig into the facts of this case, it's not as antiseptic as Bob tries to make it seem. He was tracking him in his car, and when the kid tried to shake him, he got out of his car (thus escalating the situation) and tried to give chase. The tone of his voice and the words he used, on tape, express a state of agitation and anger. Martin's conversation with his girlfriend expressed a state of concern, which is not unreasonable because he's a kid and he's being stalked by an adult he doesn't know for reasons he doesn't understand.Other than Zimmerman not being very good at fighting and the bullet hole in Martin's chese, literally everything else is open to speculation. But if it were your kid, would you not wonder WTF happened and take Zimmerman to task for stalking and then chasing your kid? For not just letting him go? Your kid. Walking alone at night. Unarmed. Doing nothing. Grown man following in a car. Your kid runs. Adult guy gives chase. Altercation happens, and, good for him, kid handles himself. But dummy has a gun and shoots him.You sure that situation sits well with you? The best part is when certain people here blame the liberal media for making an issue out of it. Rather then actual common sense and facts.
Hondo and Cirrhosisdawg takin' a poundin' to the roundin' in this thread from the natives even though they are on the right side of the argument.The Tug can be a tuff and hostile place.
Hondo and Cirrhosisdawg takin' a poundin' to the roundin' in this thread from the natives even though they are on the right side of the argument.The Tug can be a tuff and hostile place. Being right is all that matters. Fuck the natives.
Hondo and Cirrhosisdawg takin' a poundin' to the roundin' in this thread from the natives even though they are on the right side of the argument.The Tug can be a tuff and hostile place. Just don't argue that the mainstream media, which is run mostly by entertainment executives at present, is objective or fair. Corporations run on money, so any fool that doesn't factor that in is, well, like Hondo.
But you Zimmerman apologists really can't see that he provoked, escalated and caused the confrontation? And you actually claim Zimmerman wasn't stalking the kid? Amazing. So if someone was watching me and trying to follow me I would be concerned. I have a cell phone I'd probably call the police. I wouldn't beat the shit out of them and repeatedly slam their head onto the concrete without some other mitigating factor. I could really care less about Zimmerman. But being a fat nosy neighborhood watch guy isn't reason enough. Well, first of all, you're not 17. Second of all, it's easy to talk about it in the abstract. If you actually dig into the facts of this case, it's not as antiseptic as Bob tries to make it seem. He was tracking him in his car, and when the kid tried to shake him, he got out of his car (thus escalating the situation) and tried to give chase. The tone of his voice and the words he used, on tape, express a state of agitation and anger. Martin's conversation with his girlfriend expressed a state of concern, which is not unreasonable because he's a kid and he's being stalked by an adult he doesn't know for reasons he doesn't understand.Other than Zimmerman not being very good at fighting and the bullet hole in Martin's chese, literally everything else is open to speculation. But if it were your kid, would you not wonder WTF happened and take Zimmerman to task for stalking and then chasing your kid? For not just letting him go? Your kid. Walking alone at night. Unarmed. Doing nothing. Grown man following in a car. Your kid runs. Adult guy gives chase. Altercation happens, and, good for him, kid handles himself. But dummy has a gun and shoots him.You sure that situation sits well with you? My kid would have gone in the house and gotten me. He would not call his girlfriend He would not attack that person beat him to the ground then mount him and beat his head on the concrete. I've read the case a number of times. You also leave out the high crime rate the gated community was experiencing which was certainly cause for residents to be concerned. Or that Zimmerman had lost Trayvon and asked police to call him when a unit arrived. You also didn't mention the witness that saw Trayvon on top of Zimmerman wailing away and Zimmerman screaming for help.Yeah there's stuff we don't know. But what we do know is quite a bit and sufficient to support Zimmermans claims.
I always liked the picture of 5 year old Trayvon. That's what the MSM does while protecting the criminal and their narrative. He wanted to be an astronaut So it was ok to murder him?
I always liked the picture of 5 year old Trayvon. That's what the MSM does while protecting the criminal and their narrative. He wanted to be an astronaut
I always liked the picture of 5 year old Trayvon. That's what the MSM does while protecting the criminal and their narrative.
If someone had you down smashing your head in the concrete you'd shoot them Hondo. Not sure how much damage your French fry shooter would do but you'd give it a try.When people are trying to kill you they Damn well deserve to be shot.
If someone had you down smashing your head in the concrete you'd shoot them Hondo. Not sure how much damage your French fry shooter would do but you'd give it a try.When people are trying to kill you they Damn well deserve to be shot. Well I haven't read the case 15 times like you say you have. But let's see here. Here's why I wouldn't shoot him.- I don't view black kids as a threat.- I wouldn't engage a random kid for no reason. - I'd never be in a place to be in a fight with a kid- If a kid engaged me for no reason, I'd probably pull my gun first and walk away.- if I did get in a fight with a kid, I wouldn't be on the ground crying with him wailing away.- Even if all the failed and I got my ass beat. I'd chalk it up to my own stupidity and walk away as I have the couple times I've had my ass beat.Ok sweet pea?
If someone had you down smashing your head in the concrete you'd shoot them Hondo. Not sure how much damage your French fry shooter would do but you'd give it a try.When people are trying to kill you they Damn well deserve to be shot. Well I haven't read the case 15 times like you say you have. But let's see here. Here's why I wouldn't shoot him.- I don't view black kids as a threat.- I wouldn't engage a random kid for no reason. - I'd never be in a place to be in a fight with a kid- If a kid engaged me for no reason, I'd probably pull my gun first and walk away.- if I did get in a fight with a kid, I wouldn't be on the ground crying with him wailing away.- Even if all the failed and I got my ass beat. I'd chalk it up to my own stupidity and walk away as I have the couple times I've had my ass beat.Ok sweet pea? Copy. You're dumber than I thought and that's really hard to do.
If someone had you down smashing your head in the concrete you'd shoot them Hondo. Not sure how much damage your French fry shooter would do but you'd give it a try.When people are trying to kill you they Damn well deserve to be shot. Well I haven't read the case 15 times like you say you have. But let's see here. Here's why I wouldn't shoot him.- I don't view black kids as a threat.- I wouldn't engage a random kid for no reason. - I'd never be in a place to be in a fight with a kid- If a kid engaged me for no reason, I'd probably pull my gun first and walk away.- if I did get in a fight with a kid, I wouldn't be on the ground crying with him wailing away.- Even if all the failed and I got my ass beat. I'd chalk it up to my own stupidity and walk away as I have the couple times I've had my ass beat.Ok sweet pea? Copy. You're dumber than I thought and that's really hard to do. From the dude who thinks it's fair to shoot someone cause you got your ass beat.
If someone had you down smashing your head in the concrete you'd shoot them Hondo. Not sure how much damage your French fry shooter would do but you'd give it a try.When people are trying to kill you they Damn well deserve to be shot. Well I haven't read the case 15 times like you say you have. But let's see here. Here's why I wouldn't shoot him.- I don't view black kids as a threat.- I wouldn't engage a random kid for no reason. - I'd never be in a place to be in a fight with a kid- If a kid engaged me for no reason, I'd probably pull my gun first and walk away.- if I did get in a fight with a kid, I wouldn't be on the ground crying with him wailing away.- Even if all the failed and I got my ass beat. I'd chalk it up to my own stupidity and walk away as I have the couple times I've had my ass beat.Ok sweet pea? Copy. You're dumber than I thought and that's really hard to do. From the dude who thinks it's fair to shoot someone cause you got your ass beat. From the dude who'd pull a gun on a year old without even being assaulted.
Can't we all just get along?
But you Zimmerman apologists really can't see that he provoked, escalated and caused the confrontation? And you actually claim Zimmerman wasn't stalking the kid? Amazing. So if someone was watching me and trying to follow me I would be concerned. I have a cell phone I'd probably call the police. I wouldn't beat the shit out of them and repeatedly slam their head onto the concrete without some other mitigating factor. I could really care less about Zimmerman. But being a fat nosy neighborhood watch guy isn't reason enough. Well, first of all, you're not 17. Second of all, it's easy to talk about it in the abstract. If you actually dig into the facts of this case, it's not as antiseptic as Bob tries to make it seem. He was tracking him in his car, and when the kid tried to shake him, he got out of his car (thus escalating the situation) and tried to give chase. The tone of his voice and the words he used, on tape, express a state of agitation and anger. Martin's conversation with his girlfriend expressed a state of concern, which is not unreasonable because he's a kid and he's being stalked by an adult he doesn't know for reasons he doesn't understand.Other than Zimmerman not being very good at fighting and the bullet hole in Martin's chese, literally everything else is open to speculation. But if it were your kid, would you not wonder WTF happened and take Zimmerman to task for stalking and then chasing your kid? For not just letting him go? Your kid. Walking alone at night. Unarmed. Doing nothing. Grown man following in a car. Your kid runs. Adult guy gives chase. Altercation happens, and, good for him, kid handles himself. But dummy has a gun and shoots him.You sure that situation sits well with you? My kid would have gone in the house and gotten me. He would not call his girlfriend He would not attack that person beat him to the ground then mount him and beat his head on the concrete. I've read the case a number of times. You also leave out the high crime rate the gated community was experiencing which was certainly cause for residents to be concerned. Or that Zimmerman had lost Trayvon and asked police to call him when a unit arrived. You also didn't mention the witness that saw Trayvon on top of Zimmerman wailing away and Zimmerman screaming for help.Yeah there's stuff we don't know. But what we do know is quite a bit and sufficient to support Zimmermans claims. Of course. How could I forget? Your kid's a giant pussy. Trayvon wasn't.Fuck off; You haven't read shit.I didn't leave anything out. Those points are not relevant. We still (for the time being) live in a country without state curfews and where one has the right to generally walk in public spaces without being harassed. You know, freedom and shit.The only thing we don't know ... at all ... is whether Zimmerman gave up the stalk and was withdrawing and was attacked by Martin ... effectively a reversal of what Zimmerman started. Zero evidence. All the evidence relates to Zimmerman the instigator. All of it. The rest of it is simply biased conjecture.You know, it is Ok to win the struggle when you're defending yourself. Like Martin did. Doesn't make you an attacker under the law.@StrongArmCobra
