Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kavanaugh Nomination: Full Speed Ahead – Lunch Alert!

24

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd lay odds that those "death threats" were about as real as this hate crime.


    https://airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2017/09/28/racial-slurs-written-on-dorm-room-boards-of-black-air-force-academy-cadet-candidates/


    Without independent verification there is no reason to ever take the word of what a liberal says.

    https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/09/20/politics/kavanaugh-ford-death-threats/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
    I don't see Kavanaugh wanting a delay because of death threats. More bullshit to go with the 36 year wait, request to have FBI investigate prior to testifying and the dems sitting on this for months just to pull this! It's all to attempt to delay the vote until after the midterms. Nothing else.
    Wut? This is copy pasta from the article.

    Kavanaugh, who is married with two daughters, has received around-the-clock protection from US Marshals since President Donald Trump nominated him to the bench in July.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd lay odds that those "death threats" were about as real as this hate crime.


    https://airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2017/09/28/racial-slurs-written-on-dorm-room-boards-of-black-air-force-academy-cadet-candidates/


    Without independent verification there is no reason to ever take the word of what a liberal says.

    https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/09/20/politics/kavanaugh-ford-death-threats/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
    I noticed that there was no verification by the police that the threats were credible in the case of Ford while the police state clearly in your source that they are taking some of the threats against the judge as credible.

    Left wing political violence is tolerated, encouraged and winked at Rat party officeholders, not by the GOP
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd lay odds that those "death threats" were about as real as this hate crime.


    https://airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2017/09/28/racial-slurs-written-on-dorm-room-boards-of-black-air-force-academy-cadet-candidates/


    Without independent verification there is no reason to ever take the word of what a liberal says.

    https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/09/20/politics/kavanaugh-ford-death-threats/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
    I noticed that there was no verification by the police that the threats were credible in the case of Ford while the police state clearly in your source that they are taking some of the threats against the judge as credible.

    Left wing political violence is tolerated, encouraged and winked at Rat party officeholders, not by the GOP
    Now you trust CNN?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    No, I trust the police who claimed the threats against the Judge were credible
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,910 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    I'd lay odds that those "death threats" were about as real as this hate crime.


    https://airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2017/09/28/racial-slurs-written-on-dorm-room-boards-of-black-air-force-academy-cadet-candidates/


    Without independent verification there is no reason to ever take the word of what a liberal says.

    https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/09/20/politics/kavanaugh-ford-death-threats/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/
    I don't see Kavanaugh wanting a delay because of death threats. More bullshit to go with the 36 year wait, request to have FBI investigate prior to testifying and the dems sitting on this for months just to pull this! It's all to attempt to delay the vote until after the midterms. Nothing else.
    Wut? This is copy pasta from the article.

    Kavanaugh, who is married with two daughters, has received around-the-clock protection from US Marshals since President Donald Trump nominated him to the bench in July.
    That goes with being a supreme. Not for some 36 year late I got my booby touched but I can't remember when, where or who was at the party. But he did it!
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,141 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    What about the death threats she's gotten from the peaceful conservatives?
    Without proof that those threats actually happened and that they came from Conservatives they are worthless. Just like with all the bogus hate crimes. Liberals lie, it's what they do it's who they are.
    Yes she's making up the death threats now. STFU. She doesn't have proof of her story in the 80s. But there's proof of the death threats, that's going on right now.

    At least be like the other good lap dogs Damone and Pawz and blame liberals for conservatives being shitty.
    fuck off. Dumbshit. Capital Hill is a fucking fortress. Either testify to STFU
    Ok so you'd be fine with death threats? You wouldn't take your time and make sure you have the property security in place?

    Like I said, I have zero idea if her story is true and really could give a shit. I don't care about what he did in the 80s unless it was egregious. But her taking a few weeks to get get shit together is acceptable and what any smart person would do.
    Why does she need a few weeks? She’s had 35 years to replay the event.

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    SFGbob said:

    I'd lay odds that those "death threats" were about as real as this hate crime.

    https://airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2017/09/28/racial-slurs-written-on-dorm-room-boards-of-black-air-force-academy-cadet-candidates/

    Without independent verification there is no reason to ever take the word of what a liberal says.

    Did you have the chance to watch that sanctimonious, condescending ranking officer going on and on virtue signaling about that fake scandal? Big hits on YouTube. If that were me, I wouldn't show my fucking face if I were him, cause that shit was so fake from the get-go that only a dumbass Ultra-Lib would buy it hook, line and sinker like he did. They pour that "inclusion" shit on so thick it's fucking gagging to listen to.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    This is past desperation on the part of the Dems. Her story is so bad that even Feinstein thought something was rotten in Denmark. And then the FBI investigation demand. Pretty clear that was Her out. Her lawyer, Mrs Duck, YES!!!, of the Autzen Ducks, knows that will never happen and she won’t have to embarrass herself in front of the Senate.

    Even Megan Kelly, of the bleeding Kelly’s, shut down her panel of frothing morons that this was way more Barnum and Bailey than whatever Anita Hill was.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Swaye said:

    This whole thing just looks like a desperate Hail Mary 11th hour Feinstein led carnival ride to fuck over a very qualified Judge. It's bullshit.

    Like Dabone said, elections have consequences. Stop running power hungry morons like Hillary and you wouldn't have had to deal with this. A loaf of bread could have beaten the Trumpster.

    White bread.

    America would never elect dark bread. Don't even get me started on that zebra bread - pumpernickle.

    And not a bagel with a hole in it.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,348 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
    I don't follow? If the Dems controlled the Senate as was the case when Obama took office, then Obama would have been able to get his nominee on the court. ALL elections matter.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
    I don't follow? If the Dems controlled the Senate as was the case when Obama took office, then Obama would have been able to get his nominee on the court. ALL elections matter.
    There's truth in that however who nominates the judge?
  • USMChawk
    USMChawk Member Posts: 1,800
    edited September 2018
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
    I don't follow? If the Dems controlled the Senate as was the case when Obama took office, then Obama would have been able to get his nominee on the court. ALL elections matter.
    There's truth in that however who nominates the judge?
    I’ll play along. The President nominates the Justice. Now it’s your turn. Who confirms the nomination?
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    The Democrat's know that Kavanaugh will be confirmed. This entire show is to give Democrat Senators at risk in red states cover for voting no on Kavanaugh.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,141 Standard Supporter
    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,910 Standard Supporter

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    It's all a big hoax. If the ends justify the means comrade.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    It's a hearing, not a legal case. Since there is no jury to hear the he said/she said, I don't know if it matters all that much who goes first. I don't see anyone's mind being changed regardless.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    USMChawk said:

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Just vote and move on. This cunt isn’t going to go before the committee under oath. The FBI isn’t going to look into a 36 year old case where someone is accused of trying to make out with a chick and failed. Not a single witness, classmate or former girlfriends back any of this up. It’s a stall tactic. Would be funny as shit if she testified and they got her for perjury.

    Dems are trying too cash in on #metoo and act like any acquisition is an outrage on the level of Bill Cosby. Fuck off. Some really smart person said elections have consequences. Stop running socialist nutballs and incompetent women and beat Trump. Also, good job Harry Reid. The inability of dems to stop anything is on you. Does he poast here? Fuck off.

    Fucking this. This is what modern liberals will never understand. You cannot help the groups you claim need helping if you can't win Federal, State and Local elections.
    Yeah I always find it funny when conservatives like DaBoner say that but didn't let Obama choose the next supreme court nominee.
    I don't follow? If the Dems controlled the Senate as was the case when Obama took office, then Obama would have been able to get his nominee on the court. ALL elections matter.
    There's truth in that however who nominates the judge?
    I’ll play along. The President nominates the Justice. Now it’s your turn. Who confirms the nomination?
    Of course the Senate. And it was brilliant for the Republicans to focus on supreme Court once it became clear Trump would win the nomination. And it was brilliant for Republicans to block the nomination until after the election betting the backlash for stonewalling would be less than the enthusiasm from the base to have conservative judges. And it was smart of Trump to present his list of judges 6 months before the election. And dumb of Hillary to assume it was her destiny to be president. Which in turn hurt liberal voter turnout for Congress.



    Oh yeah and dumb of Democrats to only have Bernie and Hillary as a choice.


    Where was I again? Oh yeah the DNC is fucktarded.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,141 Standard Supporter
    dflea said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    It's a hearing, not a legal case. Since there is no jury to hear the he said/she said, I don't know if it matters all that much who goes first. I don't see anyone's mind being changed regardless.
    So Kavanaugh is supposed to defend himself against what he thinks some gal might say?

    No. Sorry. It don’t work that way.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Swaye said:

    I like how Dr. Ford is insisting Kavanaugh testify first and then she'll make her accusation on what may have happened 35 years ago.

    That is SO fucked versus judicial precedence. The accuser ALWAYS goes first and then the accused has an opportunity to defend themself.

    That's like playing overtime and letting the second team with the ball run their plays without the opponent put a defense on the field.

    The accusers lawyer just surrendered whatever advantage they had with that request. The truth no longer matters; only scoring points does.

    Welcome to the SC Justice Kavanaugh.
    This. Regardless of what actually happened that night in 1984 or whenever, this request reeks of "this is a political sham."
    Yes and no. I think there's truth in what she says and I think it shouldn't disqualify kavanaugh. In other words, I think her bringing this up is genuine. And Democrats are trying to be quiet and let Republicans say stupid shit about it. Like this:

    "Did y'all hear this latest late-breaking news from the Kavanaugh hearings?" he said, according to the Post and Courier. "Ruth Bader Ginsburg came out that she was groped by Abraham Lincoln."

    Mississippi Republican Chris McDaniel, a Senate candidate, dismissed the "made-up" scandal. "All of the sudden, that disqualifies this man?" he said on the "Focal Point" show on American Family Radio. "No, not a chance."


    My point is, there are independent woman that are listening. And pretty much every woman has been or knows someone who has been in that situation. And not said anything at the time. What is their reaction when Republicans are making fun of it or dismissing it as bullshit?