Offseason Natty paying off big for Our Ducks!
Comments
-
Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
-
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year? -
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel. -
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel. -
Of course not, and it was not as unlikely in 2016 as Oregon this year, but it was still going out on a limb to predict Washington would have made the playoffs in 2016. I'm just saying, you can't have it both ways.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year? -
Damn straight you can't have it both ways. We? made fun of UW of winning offseason natty after offseason natty for years. Now we? are making fun of UO for same.greenblood said:
Of course not, and it was not as unlikely in 2016, but still it was going out on a limb to say Washington would have made the playoffs in 2016. I'm just saying, you can't have it both ways.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Equal rights and shit. -
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you. -
So you're not going to the playoff and it has nothing to do with who USC selects as QB, got it.Mosster47 said:
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you. -
No, and USC wins the south this year and beats whatever decent team comes out of the north like what should have happened in 2016 if not for CMSCH being an idiot.dnc said:
So you're not going to the playoff and it has nothing to do with who USC selects as QB, got it.Mosster47 said:
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you. -
So he is an idiot until he isn't?Mosster47 said:
No, and USC wins the south this year and beats whatever decent team comes out of the north like what should have happened in 2016 if not for CMSCH being an idiot.dnc said:
So you're not going to the playoff and it has nothing to do with who USC selects as QB, got it.Mosster47 said:
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you.
Struggling again
-
No, CMSCH has always been one but there is no one to even push that freshman QB they have so he can't fuck this one up.RaceBannon said:
So he is an idiot until he isn't?Mosster47 said:
No, and USC wins the south this year and beats whatever decent team comes out of the north like what should have happened in 2016 if not for CMSCH being an idiot.dnc said:
So you're not going to the playoff and it has nothing to do with who USC selects as QB, got it.Mosster47 said:
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you.
Struggling again -
I don't expect to see the smoke-stack-I in Eugene any time soon, but it's pretty clear that there is a new tone in terms of physicality and size in the trenches. Look no further than Oregon's 2018 recruiting class to see that this will be an Oregon offense with a
WisconsinBama twist. -
Good offseason. Great championship.oregonblitzkrieg said:I don't expect to see the smoke-stack-I in Eugene any time soon, but it's pretty clear that there is a new tone in terms of physicality and size in the trenches. Look no further than Oregon's 2018 recruiting class to see that this will be an Oregon offense with a
WisconsinBama twist.
-
UW or Stanford will win the North. Oregon has no chance. Coaching matters.Mosster47 said:
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you. -
RoadDawg55 said:
UW or Stanford will win the North. Oregon has no chance. Coaching matters.Mosster47 said:
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you.
-
Noted CFB weighs in. @yogirothdawg true ?!?!Mosster47 said:
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you. -
Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
-
@Mosster47 @oregonblitzkriegMikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began. -
Oh the joy of Quook tears. MMMMMmmmmmmmmMosster47 said:
No, and USC wins the south this year and beats whatever decent team comes out of the north like what should have happened in 2016 if not for CMSCH being an idiot.dnc said:
So you're not going to the playoff and it has nothing to do with who USC selects as QB, got it.Mosster47 said:
I don't see a lot of difference between UW, Oregon, and Stanford. Doog fans think they are great, but you're just not and that's fine. There are no great teams in the Pac-12 this year (sound familiar?)dnc said:
Sweet, so I'll put you down for winning the north then?Mosster47 said:
No, the conference blows dick this year but it isn't absolutely horrendous this year and it's almost impossible for country music sensation Clay Helton to fuck up his QB situation this year. Let's not forget Helton's butt fuckery is more responsible for your playoff run than UW. If Darnold starts from day one 2016=2017 in Doogville.dnc said:
Well they were right in 2016.greenblood said:Two years ago pundits said the same thing about Washington. It’s stupid, but I didn’t see anybody here mocking Washington two years ago.
You think the Ducks are making the playoffs this year?
Either way it leads to UW's 15 year plan to lose a Rose Bowel.
I could see a 2000 type thing where Oregon, UW, and Stanford all split with each other in weird ways and it goes to a tie breaker where that Aubbie loss might screw you. -
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began. -
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
-
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for. -
So you’re saying there’s no way to be disappointed in Oregon football this year as long as they win 8 games?ntxduck said:
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
That’s an odd take.
-
Yep. For the Ducks to win 10 games they can't have an injury, anywhere and they need a few teams on the schedule to be worse than projected.ntxduck said:
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
They're really the only program on an upward trajectory in the conference in terms of talent acquisition so they will get there soon, but they aren't there yet.
Getting blown out is unacceptable as they are fairly healthy, but double digit wins is a stretch. -
Mosster47 said:
Yep. For the Ducks to win 10 games they can't have an injury, anywhere and they need a few teams on the schedule to be worse than projected.ntxduck said:
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
They're really the only program on an upward trajectory in the conference in terms of talent acquisition so they will get there soon, but they aren't there yet.
Getting blown out is unacceptable as they are fairly healthy, but double digit wins is a stretch.
-
I mean if they lose 4 games by 20+ points, yeah that's disappointing. But there isn't enough veteran talent at DT, CB, RB, WR for them to realistically be any better than 9-3 unless the Pac 12 is seriously awful.MikeSeaver said:
So you’re saying there’s no way to be disappointed in Oregon football this year as long as they win 8 games?ntxduck said:
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
That’s an odd take. -
Lol you fucking said months ago it doesn't matter who coached this team they were for sure a 10-11 wins with Herbert. Getting nervous the off season is almost over?Mosster47 said:
Yep. For the Ducks to win 10 games they can't have an injury, anywhere and they need a few teams on the schedule to be worse than projected.ntxduck said:
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
They're really the only program on an upward trajectory in the conference in terms of talent acquisition so they will get there soon, but they aren't there yet.
Getting blown out is unacceptable as they are fairly healthy, but double digit wins is a stretch. -
Link?CuntWaffle said:
Lol you fucking said months ago it doesn't matter who coached this team they were for sure a 10-11 wins with Herbert. Getting nervous the off season is almost over?Mosster47 said:
Yep. For the Ducks to win 10 games they can't have an injury, anywhere and they need a few teams on the schedule to be worse than projected.ntxduck said:
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
They're really the only program on an upward trajectory in the conference in terms of talent acquisition so they will get there soon, but they aren't there yet.
Getting blown out is unacceptable as they are fairly healthy, but double digit wins is a stretch. -
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/48132/vegas-sure-likes-our-dwags/p2:Mosster47 said:
Link?CuntWaffle said:
Lol you fucking said months ago it doesn't matter who coached this team they were for sure a 10-11 wins with Herbert. Getting nervous the off season is almost over?Mosster47 said:
Yep. For the Ducks to win 10 games they can't have an injury, anywhere and they need a few teams on the schedule to be worse than projected.ntxduck said:
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
They're really the only program on an upward trajectory in the conference in terms of talent acquisition so they will get there soon, but they aren't there yet.
Getting blown out is unacceptable as they are fairly healthy, but double digit wins is a stretch.
First you provided this gem:
"I expect Oregon to do the same, but might win the bowl game as they'll lose two conference games and play in the gas station bowl or some garbage."
3 OOC wins, 7 conf wins = 10 wins. Moments later you doubled down:
"Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do." -
What the fuck?ntxduck said:
I mean if they lose 4 games by 20+ points, yeah that's disappointing. But there isn't enough veteran talent at DT, CB, RB, WR for them to realistically be any better than 9-3 unless the Pac 12 is seriously awful.MikeSeaver said:
So you’re saying there’s no way to be disappointed in Oregon football this year as long as they win 8 games?ntxduck said:
If you're disappointed in Oregon football this year, it's more of an issue with your expectations than the football team. This is an 8-4, 9-3 team, and yeah it will be funny to see the quooks online melt down after the first couple of losses.MikeSeaver said:
Well I was wrong about Helfrich until I was right, so we’ll see.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your post was complete shit except for MM8. I like it.MikeSeaver said:Oregon is going to suck this year. No running backs what so ever. We’ve had at least one NFL back on the roster (if not 2) for like the last 18 years in a row. Guy Herbert is the worst CFB QB we’ve had in the grouping of Harrington, Clemmins, Dixon, Thomas, MM8.
I know it’s over and it never really began.
Also, rereading my post reminded me that I forgot to mention our receivers. that was only because I don’t know who any of them are.
People think Oregon are going to surprise everyone this year. I think they will too. They’re going to be a lot worse than we’re preparing for.
That’s an odd take.
