I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.
Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.
The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.
The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.
Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.
Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
Uh... Stanford beat both of us last year. People keep saying they will die, but they haven't yet. Of course they lost their bowl, but that's just Pac-12 football. I will take you on your word that Oregon is BACK.
I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.
Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.
The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.
The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.
Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.
Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.
Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.
The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.
The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.
Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.
Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
Uh... Stanford beat both of us last year. People keep saying they will die, but they haven't yet. Of course they lost their bowl, but that's just Pac-12 football. I will take you on your word that Oregon is BACK.
I don't think Oregon is back, but UW has been a paper tiger as much as any team in history the last two years. 2016 you had a schedule so easy you'd have to look at the way back to Oregon's schedule this season to find one easier. UW played two good teams that year and were physically dominated by both.
Last year I thought Stanford and ASU were by far the most physical teams in the conference and both slapped UW around. The ASU/Oregon game with a healthy Herbie was the best comparison to where both programs are; fairly soft, but a 9 or 10 win team in a shit conference. It was Pete's four year plan to lose a Rose Bowl or whatever the shit they called that Penn State game.
This year UW is going to get absolutely bitch slapped up front to start the season, split the Oregon and Stanford games (don't know which will be the L), then lose their bowl game.
I expect Oregon to do the same, but might win the bowl game as they'll lose two conference games and play in the gas station bowl or some garbage.
I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.
Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.
The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.
The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.
Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.
Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
Uh... Stanford beat both of us last year. People keep saying they will die, but they haven't yet. Of course they lost their bowl, but that's just Pac-12 football. I will take you on your word that Oregon is BACK.
I don't think Oregon is back, but UW has been a paper tiger as much as any team in history the last two years. 2016 you had a schedule so easy you'd have to look at the way back to Oregon's schedule this season to find one easier. UW played two good teams that year and were physically dominated by both.
Last year I thought Stanford and ASU were by far the most physical teams in the conference and both slapped UW around. The ASU/Oregon game with a healthy Herbie was the best comparison to where both programs are; fairly soft, but a 9 or 10 win team in a shit conference. It was Pete's four year plan to lose a Rose Bowl or whatever the shit they called that Penn State game.
This year UW is going to get absolutely bitch slapped up front to start the season, split the Oregon and Stanford games (don't know which will be the L), then lose their bowl game.
I expect Oregon to do the same, but might win the bowl game as they'll lose two conference games and play in the gas station bowl or some garbage.
I like to say that the team that went to the CFP 2 years ago, shared the division title last year, and returns a boatload of key contributors on both of those teams is lucky to be on the same plane as the Ducks ... that’s how I like to Quook
GTFO with that shit ...
Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff
I like to say that the team that went to the CFP 2 years ago, shared the division title last year, and returns a boatload of key contributors on both of those teams is lucky to be on the same plane as the Ducks ... that’s how I like to Quook
GTFO with that shit ...
Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff
What is UW's best win under Peterman? I'll give you a hint; it's super fucking unimpressive.
I like to say that the team that went to the CFP 2 years ago, shared the division title last year, and returns a boatload of key contributors on both of those teams is lucky to be on the same plane as the Ducks ... that’s how I like to Quook
GTFO with that shit ...
Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff
What is UW's best win under Peterman? I'll give you a hint; it's super fucking unimpressive.
Back to back weeks destroying Stanford at home on National TV and following that up with 70-21 in Eugene
Close 2nd to winning 2 years ago in SLC against Utah
I like to say that the team that went to the CFP 2 years ago, shared the division title last year, and returns a boatload of key contributors on both of those teams is lucky to be on the same plane as the Ducks ... that’s how I like to Quook
GTFO with that shit ...
Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff
What is UW's best win under Peterman? I'll give you a hint; it's super fucking unimpressive.
you're equivocating
also 2016 stanford was huge. #7 vs #10. 10 win stanford team was assraped 44-6
I like to say that the team that went to the CFP 2 years ago, shared the division title last year, and returns a boatload of key contributors on both of those teams is lucky to be on the same plane as the Ducks ... that’s how I like to Quook
GTFO with that shit ...
Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff
What is UW's best win under Peterman? I'll give you a hint; it's super fucking unimpressive.
I actually took you guys in the other three besides Oregon. Chip is a fat uninspiring turd now and you can tell UCLA has already stopped lifting which is what he prefers so his team can get faster. The Bruins are going to be shit heaps.
Stanford is done. They are Oregon under Mike Bellotti now, which is good, but they'll lose by 17 to you guys.
The Pirate isn't coming anywhere near UW.
The Oregon line stinks of retarded pre-season polling where you look at last year's record and slap a number to the new year taking nothing else into consideration. If Herbert doesn't go down Oregon finishes with 9 or 10 wins and this game is a pick em'.
Oregon has a significant edge at QB as far as physical talent, but every other position group for both teams matches up about the same in either returning experience, depth, promising youth or being unknown.
Both programs are doing the right things now. The north will be a two team race from now on fo see who loses to USC in the conference title game.
Uh... Stanford beat both of us last year. People keep saying they will die, but they haven't yet. Of course they lost their bowl, but that's just Pac-12 football. I will take you on your word that Oregon is BACK.
I don't think Oregon is back, but UW has been a paper tiger as much as any team in history the last two years. 2016 you had a schedule so easy you'd have to look at the way back to Oregon's schedule this season to find one easier. UW played two good teams that year and were physically dominated by both.
Last year I thought Stanford and ASU were by far the most physical teams in the conference and both slapped UW around. The ASU/Oregon game with a healthy Herbie was the best comparison to where both programs are; fairly soft, but a 9 or 10 win team in a shit conference. It was Pete's four year plan to lose a Rose Bowl or whatever the shit they called that Penn State game.
This year UW is going to get absolutely bitch slapped up front to start the season, split the Oregon and Stanford games (don't know which will be the L), then lose their bowl game.
I expect Oregon to do the same, but might win the bowl game as they'll lose two conference games and play in the gas station bowl or some garbage.
First (WE?) beat Stanford by 17 then we may lose that game? Which one is it MFS?
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeur
I don't see the grandeur. The Ducks have a top 5 pick at QB, a deep but unproven RB stable, a total mystery at WR, great size but average receiving TE core, and ridiculous amount of riches on the O-line.
The D-line has some promising youth with a 1st round caliber senior. The LB's are experienced with a sure fire NFL player leading the group. The DB's are young but have a crazy amount of depth.
The punter is back, the kicker will be new.
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
I don't see the grandeur. The Ducks have a top 5 pick at QB, a deep but unproven RB stable, a total mystery at WR, great size but average receiving TE core, and ridiculous amount of riches on the O-line.
The D-line has some promising youth with a 1st round caliber senior. The LB's are experienced with a sure fire NFL player leading the group. The DB's are young but have a crazy amount of depth.
The punter is back, the kicker will be new.
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
I like some of Mossters points, though he’s spazzing out with delusions of Duck grandeur
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.
We have a coaching staff that develops players and the best S&C program in the country. You have a Sark.
Comments
Last year I thought Stanford and ASU were by far the most physical teams in the conference and both slapped UW around. The ASU/Oregon game with a healthy Herbie was the best comparison to where both programs are; fairly soft, but a 9 or 10 win team in a shit conference. It was Pete's four year plan to lose a Rose Bowl or whatever the shit they called that Penn State game.
This year UW is going to get absolutely bitch slapped up front to start the season, split the Oregon and Stanford games (don't know which will be the L), then lose their bowl game.
I expect Oregon to do the same, but might win the bowl game as they'll lose two conference games and play in the gas station bowl or some garbage.
The Mountain West was better than the Pac-12 last year, which is becoming a fairly common occurrence.
GTFO with that shit ...
Even if that was true (and it isn’t), you still have to account that the UW staff runs circles around the Oregon staff
Close 2nd to winning 2 years ago in SLC against Utah
also 2016 stanford was huge. #7 vs #10. 10 win stanford team was assraped 44-6
get fucked
Agree
The D-line has some promising youth with a 1st round caliber senior. The LB's are experienced with a sure fire NFL player leading the group. The DB's are young but have a crazy amount of depth.
The punter is back, the kicker will be new.
Replace the top 5 QB with a guy that has played a ton and you have UW. Whatever UW fans think they are capable of Duck fans should be as well. A healthy Herbie gets Oregon 9 or 10 wins last year and they are sitting around #13 in the preseason for 2018.
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
Oregon was the most consistent program in the conference for 25 years, had one bad year, one rebuild year, and appear ready to get back into double digit win territory on a regular basis again. That's not grandeur, that's what serious football programs do.
No natty. USC had 3
HTH