Why is the American & International left in bed with Islam?
Comments
-
It's many things...
The left strongly believes in world peace, without acknowledging that world peace is a fallacy. They don't understand the concept that a terrorist will still kill you even if you are kind to them.
The elitist left have knowledge of theory, but lack practical knowledge.
The left doesn't understand the difference between privileges and rights. Or they do but believe privilege only supports the rich or white.
Equality in their eyes needs to be evolved from equality of opportunity to equality of life.
*What I mean is even if a person doesn't follow through on opportunities, and just sits on their ass, they still deserve free health care, free college education, and guaranteed minimum income. Which are things people currently have to work for.
The left has fallen in love with punching up. Punching up is funny but punching down is horrible. And the punched up should never punch back, because them punching back is either racist or misogynist, while the former is appropriate and justified. FYI - Neither is OK. Example: "The neighborhood" the new CBS show. It has a preview clip that shows a black man laughing when the white neighbor opens the door because he's in a "black neighborhood". What would the public think if the roles were reversed in a "white neighborhood"?
-
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
They are flaming hypocrites
Who here other than perhaps OBK has proposed prohibiting the free exercise of Islam in the US? How does offering criticisms of contemporary Islamic civilization infringe upon anyone's 1st amendment rights?2001400ex said:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
All of the above
Consider who you are responding toYellowSnow said:
Who here other than perhaps OBK has proposed prohibiting the free exercise of Islam in the US? How does offering criticisms of contemporary Islamic civilization infringe upon anyone's 1st amendment rights?2001400ex said:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
They are flaming hypocrites
Maybe Hondo will listen to me and my brand of sunny, compassionate conservatism.RaceBannon said:
Consider who you are responding toYellowSnow said:
Who here other than perhaps OBK has proposed prohibiting the free exercise of Islam in the US? How does offering criticisms of contemporary Islamic civilization infringe upon anyone's 1st amendment rights?2001400ex said:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
All of the above
There should be a debate about whether Islam qualifies as a religion at all. Evidence shows that it's more of a political system than a religion, and I think it should be treated as such.YellowSnow said:
Who here other than perhaps OBK has proposed prohibiting the free exercise of Islam in the US? How does offering criticisms of contemporary Islamic civilization infringe upon anyone's 1st amendment rights?2001400ex said:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
Saying shit like this hurts your argumentoregonblitzkrieg said:
There should be a debate about whether Islam qualifies as a religion at all. Evidence shows that it's more of a political system than a religion, and I think it should be treated as such.YellowSnow said:
Who here other than perhaps OBK has proposed prohibiting the free exercise of Islam in the US? How does offering criticisms of contemporary Islamic civilization infringe upon anyone's 1st amendment rights?2001400ex said:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
All of the above
Why? It's true.greenblood said:
Saying shit like this hurts your argumentoregonblitzkrieg said:
There should be a debate about whether Islam qualifies as a religion at all. Evidence shows that it's more of a political system than a religion, and I think it should be treated as such.YellowSnow said:
Who here other than perhaps OBK has proposed prohibiting the free exercise of Islam in the US? How does offering criticisms of contemporary Islamic civilization infringe upon anyone's 1st amendment rights?2001400ex said:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
It's the insinuation that the Muslim religion is the issue. It's extremists that's the issue. Just like extreme Christians that want to take down Muslims are an issue.YellowSnow said:
Who here other than perhaps OBK has proposed prohibiting the free exercise of Islam in the US? How does offering criticisms of contemporary Islamic civilization infringe upon anyone's 1st amendment rights?2001400ex said:Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
-
All of the aboveIslam is NOT a religion. I know it sounds crazy, and I know I don’t get a lot of support for that idea, but I strongly believe that Islam might be dressed up as a religion: it has a holy book, it has a temple, it looks like a religion, but it’s more an ideology and a totalitarian ideology than a religion. You cannot compare it with Christianity and Judaism, and you should compare it with other totalitarian ideologies like communism or fascism. I always use one example to prove it — there are many more that — like in communism or fascism, the penalty is death if you want to leave it. I mean, you cannot leave Islam: if you are an apostate, if you are a renegade, the penalty is death, and even today in our societies, let alone in the Islamic societies, it is enacted upon, you know people ARE killed for that reason, and you can leave Christianity, you can leave Judaism.
And the other point is that Islam wants to rule the world — as you know Islam means to subjugate, wants to rule and dominate and subjugate, not only the person’s life but also a whole society. The rule of God, the rule of allah, the rule of the Quran and the Hadith is the rule of the society. I’m not talking about all Muslims, I’m talking about the ideology, and the idea of ideology cannot integrate and assimilate in a society, it wants to dominate it and it wants to subjugate with violence.
The Quran is full of more violence and anti-semitism than Mein Kampf, for instance. People and academics have proved that, so our biggest mistake is, once again, the false equality that we say that Islam is a religion, so they have the freedom of religion. And I believe it’s not religion; it should not be treated as a religion, and the constitutional freedoms of religion do not apply to an ideology. We would not allow in Holland Nazi schools for instance — it’s another totalitarian ideology. Why do we have Islamic schools? Where young children at five, six, seven, eight years old that we want to integrate, get a job, get Dutch friends, participate fully and equally in the Dutch society are being caught up with the Quran and ideology of hate and thought . . .
Geert Wilders, Dutch Politician
limitstogrowth.org/articles/2017/03/05/geert-wilders-recommends-islam-be-recategorized-as-political-not-religious/
