Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The Hondo plan
Comments
-
You have no solution other than continue the large increases in medical insurance and cost of care.pawz said:
It says more that you're afraid to answer the question.ThomasFremont said:
The guy asking this shit hole how to short the market now expects a fully cooked Medicare for all plan explained to him in detail.pawz said:
So you just want to copy somebody? Who?ThomasFremont said:
I already told you my plan. What’s your fucking plan, salt crystals in every yurt?pawz said:
Still dodging the question.ThomasFremont said:
Not really the religious type, but thanks. I’ll pray for you.pawz said:
It appears you have multiple sacred cows above questioning.ThomasFremont said:
I’m not gonna get lectured about basic understanding or healthcare by an anti vax nut.pawz said:
Why is that?ThomasFremont said:
Oh I thought you were joking.pawz said:
Your Hondo-dodge-the-point game is skrong.ThomasFremont said:
An abortion is cheaper than raising a kid. Want some more #tips ???pawz said:
When, in the economics of medicine, has anybody EVER saved money?ThomasFremont said:
You skipped the part where we save $300 billion over 10 years...Sledog said:The Hondo medical plan seems a tad expensive.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/30/bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6t-study-says.html
Let me know when the producers are competing for the customers. TIA
We pay more than prettying much every other developed country in healthcare costs. So maybe just copy those folks? Or do you prefer the status quo of pretending that we are all helpless victims of circumstance?
Try to answer the question in a way that makes the reader think you understand basic economic principles.
Nothing else matters. Your other two questions are FS.
HTH
This discussion has nothing to do with care, or types of care. It's economics stupid.
If you don't actually understand economics, just say so.
What part of their plan controls costs?
what's in the box.gif
I want providers to compete for the business. Just like every other efficient economy in the word.
It says you cant.
Your solutions at this point amount to Pollyanna bullshit. -
I never got my $2,500.00 only increases. I think a couple shlubs in Spokane gets it. @Hondo send me my money!RaceBannon said:Does the 2500 a year I am saving under Obamacare count towards the 300 million we? save under the TommyCare?
Do they count the people that are never going to pay still? They'll use more services than currently because they can and the population of shlubs will increase.
I'm back on voting in the retroactive abortion with me in charge. -
The 'solutions' you spammed the bored with the last 3 years.2001400ex said:
You have no solution other than continue the large increases in medical insurance and cost of care.pawz said:
It says more that you're afraid to answer the question.ThomasFremont said:
The guy asking this shit hole how to short the market now expects a fully cooked Medicare for all plan explained to him in detail.pawz said:
So you just want to copy somebody? Who?ThomasFremont said:
I already told you my plan. What’s your fucking plan, salt crystals in every yurt?pawz said:
Still dodging the question.ThomasFremont said:
Not really the religious type, but thanks. I’ll pray for you.pawz said:
It appears you have multiple sacred cows above questioning.ThomasFremont said:
I’m not gonna get lectured about basic understanding or healthcare by an anti vax nut.pawz said:
Why is that?ThomasFremont said:
Oh I thought you were joking.pawz said:
Your Hondo-dodge-the-point game is skrong.ThomasFremont said:
An abortion is cheaper than raising a kid. Want some more #tips ???pawz said:
When, in the economics of medicine, has anybody EVER saved money?ThomasFremont said:
You skipped the part where we save $300 billion over 10 years...Sledog said:The Hondo medical plan seems a tad expensive.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/30/bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6t-study-says.html
Let me know when the producers are competing for the customers. TIA
We pay more than prettying much every other developed country in healthcare costs. So maybe just copy those folks? Or do you prefer the status quo of pretending that we are all helpless victims of circumstance?
Try to answer the question in a way that makes the reader think you understand basic economic principles.
Nothing else matters. Your other two questions are FS.
HTH
This discussion has nothing to do with care, or types of care. It's economics stupid.
If you don't actually understand economics, just say so.
What part of their plan controls costs?
what's in the box.gif
I want providers to compete for the business. Just like every other efficient economy in the word.
It says you cant.
Your solutions at this point amount to Pollyanna bullshit.
Go fuck off. -
You sound angry. Next time post a rational thought.pawz said:
The 'solutions' you spammed the bored with the last 3 years.2001400ex said:
You have no solution other than continue the large increases in medical insurance and cost of care.pawz said:
It says more that you're afraid to answer the question.ThomasFremont said:
The guy asking this shit hole how to short the market now expects a fully cooked Medicare for all plan explained to him in detail.pawz said:
So you just want to copy somebody? Who?ThomasFremont said:
I already told you my plan. What’s your fucking plan, salt crystals in every yurt?pawz said:
Still dodging the question.ThomasFremont said:
Not really the religious type, but thanks. I’ll pray for you.pawz said:
It appears you have multiple sacred cows above questioning.ThomasFremont said:
I’m not gonna get lectured about basic understanding or healthcare by an anti vax nut.pawz said:
Why is that?ThomasFremont said:
Oh I thought you were joking.pawz said:
Your Hondo-dodge-the-point game is skrong.ThomasFremont said:
An abortion is cheaper than raising a kid. Want some more #tips ???pawz said:
When, in the economics of medicine, has anybody EVER saved money?ThomasFremont said:
You skipped the part where we save $300 billion over 10 years...Sledog said:The Hondo medical plan seems a tad expensive.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/30/bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6t-study-says.html
Let me know when the producers are competing for the customers. TIA
We pay more than prettying much every other developed country in healthcare costs. So maybe just copy those folks? Or do you prefer the status quo of pretending that we are all helpless victims of circumstance?
Try to answer the question in a way that makes the reader think you understand basic economic principles.
Nothing else matters. Your other two questions are FS.
HTH
This discussion has nothing to do with care, or types of care. It's economics stupid.
If you don't actually understand economics, just say so.
What part of their plan controls costs?
what's in the box.gif
I want providers to compete for the business. Just like every other efficient economy in the word.
It says you cant.
Your solutions at this point amount to Pollyanna bullshit.
Go fuck off. -
pawz said:
It says more that you're afraid to answer the question.ThomasFremont said:
The guy asking this shit hole how to short the market now expects a fully cooked Medicare for all plan explained to him in detail.pawz said:
So you just want to copy somebody? Who?ThomasFremont said:
I already told you my plan. What’s your fucking plan, salt crystals in every yurt?pawz said:
Still dodging the question.ThomasFremont said:
Not really the religious type, but thanks. I’ll pray for you.pawz said:
It appears you have multiple sacred cows above questioning.ThomasFremont said:
I’m not gonna get lectured about basic understanding or healthcare by an anti vax nut.pawz said:
Why is that?ThomasFremont said:
Oh I thought you were joking.pawz said:
Your Hondo-dodge-the-point game is skrong.ThomasFremont said:
An abortion is cheaper than raising a kid. Want some more #tips ???pawz said:
When, in the economics of medicine, has anybody EVER saved money?ThomasFremont said:
You skipped the part where we save $300 billion over 10 years...Sledog said:The Hondo medical plan seems a tad expensive.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/30/bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6t-study-says.html
Let me know when the producers are competing for the customers. TIA
We pay more than prettying much every other developed country in healthcare costs. So maybe just copy those folks? Or do you prefer the status quo of pretending that we are all helpless victims of circumstance?
Try to answer the question in a way that makes the reader think you understand basic economic principles.
Nothing else matters. Your other two questions are FS.
HTH
This discussion has nothing to do with care, or types of care. It's economics stupid.
If you don't actually understand economics, just say so.
What part of their plan controls costs?
what's in the box.gif
I want providers to compete for the business. Just like every other efficient economy in the word.
It says you cant.
Your solutions at this point amount to Pollyanna bullshit.
-
Next thing you lefties will want Britains dental plan it's fucking awesome!
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-s-national-health-service-struggles-with-chronic-shortages-1524308400 -
It's universal though! Everyone has the right to the same shitty care.Sledog said:
Next thing you lefties will want Britains dental plan it's fucking awesome!
https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-s-national-health-service-struggles-with-chronic-shortages-1524308400 -
Save $300 billion AND get everyone covered. According to a libertarian think tank.pawz said:
It says more that you're afraid to answer the question.ThomasFremont said:
The guy asking this shit hole how to short the market now expects a fully cooked Medicare for all plan explained to him in detail.pawz said:
So you just want to copy somebody? Who?ThomasFremont said:
I already told you my plan. What’s your fucking plan, salt crystals in every yurt?pawz said:
Still dodging the question.ThomasFremont said:
Not really the religious type, but thanks. I’ll pray for you.pawz said:
It appears you have multiple sacred cows above questioning.ThomasFremont said:
I’m not gonna get lectured about basic understanding or healthcare by an anti vax nut.pawz said:
Why is that?ThomasFremont said:
Oh I thought you were joking.pawz said:
Your Hondo-dodge-the-point game is skrong.ThomasFremont said:
An abortion is cheaper than raising a kid. Want some more #tips ???pawz said:
When, in the economics of medicine, has anybody EVER saved money?ThomasFremont said:
You skipped the part where we save $300 billion over 10 years...Sledog said:The Hondo medical plan seems a tad expensive.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/30/bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6t-study-says.html
Let me know when the producers are competing for the customers. TIA
We pay more than prettying much every other developed country in healthcare costs. So maybe just copy those folks? Or do you prefer the status quo of pretending that we are all helpless victims of circumstance?
Try to answer the question in a way that makes the reader think you understand basic economic principles.
Nothing else matters. Your other two questions are FS.
HTH
This discussion has nothing to do with care, or types of care. It's economics stupid.
If you don't actually understand economics, just say so.
What part of their plan controls costs?
what's in the box.gif
I want providers to compete for the business. Just like every other efficient economy in the word.
It says you cant.
Your solutions at this point amount to Pollyanna bullshit.
I’d take that deal for $0 savings.
And since unlike you I’d actually have to pay more in that system, I think you can shut the fuck up about it. This is all theoretical for you. Go short the market or something. -
You sound angry.ThomasFremont said:
Save $300 billion AND get everyone covered. According to a libertarian think tank.pawz said:
It says more that you're afraid to answer the question.ThomasFremont said:
The guy asking this shit hole how to short the market now expects a fully cooked Medicare for all plan explained to him in detail.pawz said:
So you just want to copy somebody? Who?ThomasFremont said:
I already told you my plan. What’s your fucking plan, salt crystals in every yurt?pawz said:
Still dodging the question.ThomasFremont said:
Not really the religious type, but thanks. I’ll pray for you.pawz said:
It appears you have multiple sacred cows above questioning.ThomasFremont said:
I’m not gonna get lectured about basic understanding or healthcare by an anti vax nut.pawz said:
Why is that?ThomasFremont said:
Oh I thought you were joking.pawz said:
Your Hondo-dodge-the-point game is skrong.ThomasFremont said:
An abortion is cheaper than raising a kid. Want some more #tips ???pawz said:
When, in the economics of medicine, has anybody EVER saved money?ThomasFremont said:
You skipped the part where we save $300 billion over 10 years...Sledog said:The Hondo medical plan seems a tad expensive.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/30/bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6t-study-says.html
Let me know when the producers are competing for the customers. TIA
We pay more than prettying much every other developed country in healthcare costs. So maybe just copy those folks? Or do you prefer the status quo of pretending that we are all helpless victims of circumstance?
Try to answer the question in a way that makes the reader think you understand basic economic principles.
Nothing else matters. Your other two questions are FS.
HTH
This discussion has nothing to do with care, or types of care. It's economics stupid.
If you don't actually understand economics, just say so.
What part of their plan controls costs?
what's in the box.gif
I want providers to compete for the business. Just like every other efficient economy in the word.
It says you cant.
Your solutions at this point amount to Pollyanna bullshit.
I’d take that deal for $0 savings.
And since unlike you I’d actually have to pay more in that system, I think you can shut the fuck up about it. This is all theoretical for you. Go short the market or something.
-
You sound like a Proud Boy.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You sound angry.ThomasFremont said:
Save $300 billion AND get everyone covered. According to a libertarian think tank.pawz said:
It says more that you're afraid to answer the question.ThomasFremont said:
The guy asking this shit hole how to short the market now expects a fully cooked Medicare for all plan explained to him in detail.pawz said:
So you just want to copy somebody? Who?ThomasFremont said:
I already told you my plan. What’s your fucking plan, salt crystals in every yurt?pawz said:
Still dodging the question.ThomasFremont said:
Not really the religious type, but thanks. I’ll pray for you.pawz said:
It appears you have multiple sacred cows above questioning.ThomasFremont said:
I’m not gonna get lectured about basic understanding or healthcare by an anti vax nut.pawz said:
Why is that?ThomasFremont said:
Oh I thought you were joking.pawz said:
Your Hondo-dodge-the-point game is skrong.ThomasFremont said:
An abortion is cheaper than raising a kid. Want some more #tips ???pawz said:
When, in the economics of medicine, has anybody EVER saved money?ThomasFremont said:
You skipped the part where we save $300 billion over 10 years...Sledog said:The Hondo medical plan seems a tad expensive.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/30/bernie-sanders-medicare-for-all-bill-estimated-at-32-6t-study-says.html
Let me know when the producers are competing for the customers. TIA
We pay more than prettying much every other developed country in healthcare costs. So maybe just copy those folks? Or do you prefer the status quo of pretending that we are all helpless victims of circumstance?
Try to answer the question in a way that makes the reader think you understand basic economic principles.
Nothing else matters. Your other two questions are FS.
HTH
This discussion has nothing to do with care, or types of care. It's economics stupid.
If you don't actually understand economics, just say so.
What part of their plan controls costs?
what's in the box.gif
I want providers to compete for the business. Just like every other efficient economy in the word.
It says you cant.
Your solutions at this point amount to Pollyanna bullshit.
I’d take that deal for $0 savings.
And since unlike you I’d actually have to pay more in that system, I think you can shut the fuck up about it. This is all theoretical for you. Go short the market or something.
