Very biblical
Comments
-
Maybe quote malfunctions have been Tequilla's problem all along. I've never read his stuff all the way through to find out.
-
RONG. You lost the minute you got into bed with people who want to use government policy to dictate the labor resources available to pair with our comparative advantage in capital.
Sad.
But admittedly: arguing with myself is the only way for me to find a fair fight on this bored.
Point of clarification: I don't want losers. I want people who aren't afraid to get their hands dirty and COMPETE in our economy.
Give me five guys from wherever who will mow my grass for $5, pick my apples for $2.75 / hour, and ship off the 20 welfare cases who won't do either in the heat, and won't do it at all for less than $75 / hour.
Give me that and I'll win even more biggly.
You used to understand this. -
LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded -
Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.
@creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.
-
Creep admires Soviet Russia and keeps a portrait of Mao Zedong in his study.
-
Too late.YellowSnow said:Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.
@creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.
HTH
Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.
PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.
And, what happened 5 years later anyway?
See?
There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.
Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure. -
The 1924 immigration law did not close the borders, although it mostly ban Asian immigrants and impose restrictions on entries from certain European countries.Wikipedia is my source?YellowSnow said:Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.
@creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.
"The Immigration Act of 1924, or Johnson–Reed Act, including the National Origins Act, and Asian Exclusion Act (Pub.L. 68–139, 43 Stat. 153, enacted May 26, 1924), was a United States federal law that set quotas on the number of immigrants from certain countries while providing funding and an enforcement mechanism to carry out the longstanding (but hitherto unenforced) ban on other non-white immigrants. The law was primarily aimed at further decreasing immigration of Southern Europeans, countries with Roman Catholic majorities, Eastern Europeans, Arabs, and Jews.[1][2][3][4] The law affirmed the longstanding ban on the immigration of other non-white persons, with the exception of black African immigrants (who had long been exempt from the ban). Thus, virtually all Asians were forbidden from immigrating to America under the Act..."
"Contrary to popular belief, Latin Americans were not prohibited or limited from immigrating under the law."
"But though the Act aimed at preserving American racial homogeneity, it set no limits on immigration from other countries of the Americas, including Latin America.[6]" -
Mike Leach, is that you?RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded -
Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.
This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.
OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.
I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid. -
Take a shot at answering the questionsSquirt said:
Mike Leach, is that you?RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy? -
Its all about legal versus illegal. Jesus Christ that's a stupid statementcreepycoug said:
Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.
This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.
OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.
I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
As stupid as thinking I said you had a problem with legal immigration
I don't have a problem with it. Immigration should be to help America. Period
Play the race card you fucking moron. Its what losers do -
Nice try on the flip comrade.oregonblitzkrieg said:Creep admires Soviet Russia and keeps a portrait of Mao Zedong in his study.
You are the pinko in today's dicushun. Everyone knows it too. Those pictures are on my wall to remind me what evil looks like. They're on your wall for inspiration. That's the difference between us.
Never thought I'd see conservatism used as means to support socialism.
Sad. -
Sounds scary.creepycoug said:
Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.
This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.
OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.
I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
Like creep off the meds scary. -
Furthermore, when
Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.creepycoug said:
Too late.YellowSnow said:Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.
@creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.
HTH
Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.
PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.
And, what happened 5 years later anyway?
See?
There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.
Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly
Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is. -
As many as the market will absorb.RaceBannon said:
Take a shot at answering the questionsSquirt said:
Mike Leach, is that you?RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy?
Because we have more capital than Mexico and thus more to marry with their excess supply of labor.
I should not have to explain this to you. -
There is a great HBO show on the Latin Explosion in entertainment which has those same numbers. Its neither good nor bad on its face. J Lo is welcome. MS 13 not so muchYellowSnow said:Furthermore, when
Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.creepycoug said:
Too late.YellowSnow said:Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.
@creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.
HTH
Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.
PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.
And, what happened 5 years later anyway?
See?
There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.
Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly
Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
America needs people that will share our common bond and be net givers to the treasury
If unskilled illegals are such a fucking boon to a country I am surprised there are any poor folks left around the world. Mexico should have a larger economy than we do -
Yellow and I are close on a lot of issues it seems but we rarely admit it
-
You are correct in the sense that the "market" forces for cheap Mexico labor, did cause the immigration from there to be negative from 2009- 15.creepycoug said:
As many as the market will absorb.RaceBannon said:
Take a shot at answering the questionsSquirt said:
Mike Leach, is that you?RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy?
Because we have more capital than Mexico and thus more to marry with their excess supply of labor.
I should not have to explain this to you. -
No one hates you or your family Creep, not here anyway, only your fucktarded open border philosophy, hth.
-
All of them. There’s a huge opportunity in California. The construction trades are a fucking scam and need a boost of competition and cost control. Guest workers to start, and with a path to citizenship.
-
You didn't have to "explain" anything because it is ludicrouscreepycoug said:
As many as the market will absorb.RaceBannon said:
Take a shot at answering the questionsSquirt said:
Mike Leach, is that you?RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy?
Because we have more capital than Mexico and thus more to marry with their excess supply of labor.
I should not have to explain this to you.
-
If you don't think this issue has been politicized to politically marshal people who don't like certain types of people here, then unfortunately it's you who's gone full moron. The lower class and uneducated in this country in particular are being used for this just as much as you like to point out that Dems use immigrants for votes. Same game. You're just selective in what you chose to observe.RaceBannon said:
Its all about legal versus illegal. Jesus Christ that's a stupid statementcreepycoug said:
Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.
This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.
OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.
I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
As stupid as thinking I said you had a problem with legal immigration
I don't have a problem with it. Immigration should be to help America. Period
Play the race card you fucking moron. Its what losers do
While there's nothing wrong with appropriately managing immigration, there is a lot wrong with moving it to the number one spot on the hit list and making the citizenry freak out about an issue in complete disproportion to its importance. I'd rather see him continue applying pressure on our trade partners and spend less time on this shit. An immigrant raped someone. An immigrant stole some guy's car. Jesus help you if you don't see it.
Immigration should be to help America. And it pretty much always has.
And quit having temper tantrums. It's not manly. -
There's probably 70- 81% agreement on policy. Enough that you could have a party platform that we could all agree upon.RaceBannon said:Yellow and I are close on a lot of issues it seems but we rarely admit it
-
I made up the quote about Jefferson. I thought you'd see that right away, but I forgot how far you've fallen. Sad.YellowSnow said:Furthermore, when
Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.creepycoug said:
Too late.YellowSnow said:Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.
@creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.
HTH
Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.
PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.
And, what happened 5 years later anyway?
See?
There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.
Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly
Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
And is it your contention that the country has been in a free fall since 1960? And who cares that they were born in Latin America? Why does that matter ... at all? When the % of people who were born in Ireland started to move the needle here did the country fail? Were the people who were freaking out about it, then, doing so for valid reasons that were later validated?
Kreist almighty. This is my point. This isn't a major problem. It's been made one, like, in the last year or two.
-
disagreeYellowSnow said:
There's probably 70- 81% agreement on policy. Enough that you could have a party platform that we could all agree upon.RaceBannon said:Yellow and I are close on a lot of issues it seems but we rarely admit it
-
Says the guy who says he's living in NW Mexico. Tell me about it.salemcoog said:
Sounds scary.creepycoug said:
Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.
This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.
OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.
I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
Like creep off the meds scary.
-
I'm arguing with 6 or 7 people across three platforms. I don't have time for niceties and if you argue like hondo you get the fuck off he getscreepycoug said:
If you don't think this issue has been politicized to politically marshal people who don't like certain types of people here, then unfortunately it's you who's gone full moron. The lower class and uneducated in this country in particular are being used for this just as much as you like to point out that Dems use immigrants for votes. Same game. You're just selective in what you chose to observe.RaceBannon said:
Its all about legal versus illegal. Jesus Christ that's a stupid statementcreepycoug said:
Who said I HAD a problem WITH legal immigration? Not me.RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
I hope you don't think your new frens are serious about LEGAL immigration. Tell me you're not that gullible. Sessions and Miller are anti-immigration, period. I didn't need to read yesterday's NYT's piece to know that Sessions' views were indelibly marked by immigrants, legal and otherwise, taking jobs at the chicken factory away from his toothless, sister loving white trash frens. It's been written about before, and he's spoken of it numerous times. He wasn't checking visa cards when he formulated those views.
This is not about legal vs. illegal buddy boy. Don't be obtuse. Your new pals don't like immigrants, especially those who look like your wife. That's not a joke, so don't get twisted. That's serious creep right there. Yes, some of them are in fact racists, and many more who support them are as well. I know you know that.
OBK is right: this is a war. There are people who do and people who do not like people like me and my family. When people don't like you, you don't like them back. It's not manly to try and make people like you. The creep clan knows how to handle enemies. We're good at it.
I'll win in any event because my genes are better than those who are afraid of me. And they should be afraid.
As stupid as thinking I said you had a problem with legal immigration
I don't have a problem with it. Immigration should be to help America. Period
Play the race card you fucking moron. Its what losers do
While there's nothing wrong with appropriately managing immigration, there is a lot wrong with moving it to the number one spot on the hit list and making the citizenry freak out about an issue in complete disproportion to its importance. I'd rather see him continue applying pressure on our trade partners and spend less time on this shit. An immigrant raped someone. An immigrant stole some guy's car. Jesus help you if you don't see it.
Immigration should be to help America. And it pretty much always has.
And quit having temper tantrums. It's not manly.
Iron Law
You have made it a race issue just like your democrat masters who want open borders like you do have told you too
It is a huge fucking issue and has nothing to do with racism.
When you pull that card you might as well log off and call it a day
Its the self titled elite who make this the issue it is by trying to get open borders. We are not going to take it. And we is a whole lot of Blacks my man. A whole lot
They see what the democrats are doing -
If you'd paid attention in Professor Hayne's course instead of sleeping off your hangover, you'd know why Mexico is poor even with a lot of poor.RaceBannon said:
There is a great HBO show on the Latin Explosion in entertainment which has those same numbers. Its neither good nor bad on its face. J Lo is welcome. MS 13 not so muchYellowSnow said:Furthermore, when
Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.creepycoug said:
Too late.YellowSnow said:Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.
@creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.
HTH
Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.
PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.
And, what happened 5 years later anyway?
See?
There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.
Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly
Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
America needs people that will share our common bond and be net givers to the treasury
If unskilled illegals are such a fucking boon to a country I am surprised there are any poor folks left around the world. Mexico should have a larger economy than we do
No capital.
And we will be poor too if our capital is left to rot on the vine, because it won't be left to rot on the vine. It will be exported. You think we're shipping off jobs now. Keep it up Lenin. -
That must be why Bill Clinton ran against illegal immigration and his wife and Obama did in 2008. That's why we had amnesty in the 80'screepycoug said:
I made up the quote about Jefferson. I thought you'd see that right away, but I forgot how far you've fallen. Sad.YellowSnow said:Furthermore, when
Yep, too late. I gave Hill $50 to try and stop it, but she's a loser and losers lose.creepycoug said:
Too late.YellowSnow said:Fucking, Christ. You said yourself not more than a few days ago that don't argue history with Yella snow.
@creepycoug , you ignorant slut, we were protectionists for the first 180 years or so of the Republic. We? closed the gates in 1924 for 41 years. And yet the country was considered a hell of a lot more laissez faire in the 1920s than it is now. I'm not saying to coddle the losers, but you can't fuck them over too badly either, lest they start revolting at the ballot box. We live in a democracy, Creep, not Soviet Russia, and the losers will go full pitchfork, populist.
HTH
Sad I had to point that out to you. I remember when you knew your shit. You and Race have been hanging around the wrong kinda people.
PS: Latin Americans were still allowed in under the '24 Act, so, yeah, you're all welcome. Imagine the shit-show if we'd be left out with other 2% countries. Criminy.
And, what happened 5 years later anyway?
See?
There is no American Utopia to which you can point. There has always been an advantageous exploitation (in the good way) of labor and capital in all of our historical upswings.
Plan for the losers and ye will be a loser. I think Jefferson said that. Not sure.
Bad, bad, history. Yes, there have always been Messicans in California, Tejas, New Messico, etc, but the flood gates didn't open until the 1960s. In 1960 there were 788,000 people residing in the US who were born in Latin America. By 2010 that number was 19,155,077. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4638184/table/T2/?report=objectonly
Quoting Jefferson in a discussion about free labor markets? If that's not fucking irony, then I don't no what is.
And is it your contention that the country has been in a free fall since 1960? And who cares that they were born in Latin America? Why does that matter ... at all? When the % of people who were born in Ireland started to move the needle here did the country fail? Were the people who were freaking out about it, then, doing so for valid reasons that were later validated?
Kreist almighty. This is my point. This isn't a major problem. It's been made one, like, in the last year or two.
Because racists the last two years!!! For fucks sake -
The relative availability of capital and labor in Mexico and the US is ludicrous? Ok.RaceBannon said:
You didn't have to "explain" anything because it is ludicrouscreepycoug said:
As many as the market will absorb.RaceBannon said:
Take a shot at answering the questionsSquirt said:
Mike Leach, is that you?RaceBannon said:LEGAL immigration where we choose who we need to help US is fine
You are arguing for illegals which is a fucking stupid argument for the point you are trying to make
I've been in construction for 40 years. I understand all.
If illegals are so fucking great why aren't other countries clamoring for their share and why is Merkel and the rest of the Euros on thin ice for their own shit hole people?
How many illegals do we need to reach economic nirvana?
Your argument is retarded
If illegals are good for America how many should we bring in? Why isn't Mexico keeping them to help their economy?
Because we have more capital than Mexico and thus more to marry with their excess supply of labor.
I should not have to explain this to you.
Your conversion is evidently complete.
