Auburn Vs Washington

Comments
-
Get an avatar, cunt!
-
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
-
Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AF, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.AuburnFan said:
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
-
-
Done, I used the better QB for our upcoming game as my avatarPurpleBaze said:
Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AF, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.AuburnFan said:
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
-
Doesn't take much to be better than our? Brownsocks.AuburnFan said:
Done, I used the better QB for our upcoming game as my avatarPurpleBaze said:
Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AF, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.AuburnFan said:
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
-
For realz? I thought he was good?PurpleBaze said:
Doesn't take much to be better than our? Brownsocks.AuburnFan said:
Done, I used the better QB for our upcoming game as my avatarPurpleBaze said:
Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AF, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.AuburnFan said:
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
Y’all arent happy with him?
-
This post is for our Bama visitor regarding UW and how they match/fit with what Bama does. Most of this stuff will be something that will probably be discussed at length when we record the next edition of the TSIO Podcast next week ... so if you don't like the length of this post, then FUCK OFF!!! and don't read anymore.AuburnFan said:I had fun with the Clemson fans leading up to week 1 last year. Hoping to do the same with you guys. We can trash talk or try to give insight about our teams ... I’m obviously expecting more trash talking (which I’ll dish back out), but if you have serious questions, I’ll answer those as well.
It will be important for UW to put themselves in positions where they always have a check down option(s) for Jake to get rid of the ball in a hurry. 4-5 yard gains against Alabama keep you ahead of the sticks ... that's important. LSU is actually a very important game to watch because it shows what happens when you have a good defense coupled with an offense that does not give Alabama EASY scoring opportunities. That's a good blue print for figuring out how you can stay competitive against Alabama. LSU's biggest problem in that game was that their offense and in particular the QB position was so inept that Alabama didn't respect the passing game much at all and was able to focus on the run game. UW is by far more balanced ... I don't think it's close to a stretch to say that they are the most balanced team Alabama has played all year by a long shot. That will cause some issues for Alabama.
Another thing I've noticed when watching some of the Ole Miss game is that Alabama almost always brings a slot corner or a MLB (or both) in a blitz situation against teams that spread them out. It not only helps to slow down any run situations that may come, but allows the secondary to squat on routes and not be concerned about plays down the field. Picking up those blitzes and giving a pocket will be critical because IF you can get situations where the WRs are 1 on 1 versus the Alabama secondary, you do have opportunities to create some chunk plays. And, the blitzes that Alabama runs really aren't that hard to figure out where they are coming from. They tend to tip the blitz location.
For UW, the LT, LG, and RT are good enough to compete at this level. In the USC game, the LG was coming back from an injury and I do question how healthy he was. We "hopefully" learned a few things from that game that can help us going forward. UW's 2 most basic formations that they run are 2 WR, 2 TE, 1 RB and 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB. Alabama is very strong when you get them in a position where they line up and are able to easily identify their responsibilities. A staple of Chris Petersen's offenses though are shifts and motions and I suspect that we'll try to use those situations to either out-flank or confuse the Alabama defense and get a bust in their assignments. UW has at least 3 TEs that they rotate into the game that all are very good run blockers with Darrell Daniels a potential option if they decide to use him in the passing game (which I think could work very well for UW in this game). I expect our line to be in positions where we will be chipping at least one of the edge rushers each time with the TE before releasing ... the TE releasing should quiet some of the middle blitzes from Alabama. I'd expect the C + RG to combo block a fair amount and our RBs often stay in to block so I'd expect that whichever guard isn't being helped with combo blocking will get focus from the RB.
Alabama is very well coached and very fundamentally sound (that shows up big time compared to other SEC teams and the mistakes that they tend to make play after play). It will be important to use some of that against them by going against tendencies from time to time. To slow Alabama down defensively, you have to get them in a position where they are thinking versus reacting and getting them to question what it is that they are seeing. IF Washington can be successful in this, then you have yourself a ball game.
Defensively, the 3 DTs for Washington (Gaines, Qualls, and Vea) are stout and will be a handful for the Alabama middle run game. As others have noted here, the secondary will be as good as any that Alabama has seen this year. Budda Baker is as good of a safety as there is in the country. The weakness to the defense is at the OLB positions. To slow Alabama's offense down, you have to make Hurts a passer. Kiffin tries to limit the exposure of Hurts by giving him a lot of quick throws and screens to get the ball out and into the hands of playmakers. We're very familiar with that with Kiffin and Sark being from the same tree. The quick WR screens will be hard pressed to work against Jones/King on the outside ... as good of a CB tandem as Alabama has seen all year and one of the best in the nation. Not only are they good in coverage, but they are excellent tacklers particularly in the quick WR screen game. The defense has gotten better since they moved Taylor Rapp in to play S and moved Budda more into a slot corner/rover type of role. IF and this is a big IF Washington can keep Hurts from beating them with his legs, then Washington should be able to limit Alabama's offense.
You've noted in a few different areas looking at yardage totals as a measure of the UW defense and specifically cited certain games and yardage totals. One thing you have to understand about the PAC is that teams here like to push play totals upwards of 80-100 on a game by game basis. It's important to look at things from a yard per play basis when looking at the running and passing games. And I also think it's important to look at things from a conference only or P5 only standpoint versus your entire schedule because the entire schedule can be skewed by a few overmatched opponents.
Washington in conference has given up 4 yards per carry in the run game. The games where UW has given up over 4 yards per carry are as follows:
Arizona: 43 for 308 (7.2 yards per carry)
Oregon: 43 for 230 (5.3 yards per carry)
Oregon St: 30 for 177 (5.9 yards per carry)
Utah: 47 for 213 (4.5 yards per carry)
The Arizona game is unique and probably what they do is most similar to what Auburn runs in that the QB is a massive running threat. 176 of those yards came from Arizona's QB ... which is why I said that the biggest obstacle in this game for the UW defense is stopping Hurts in the run game. There's a lot of read option that Arizona runs and if there's a big weakness to the UW defense at times it is that it doesn't like to change what it does to start games. They will adjust at halftime if needed and against both Arizona and Utah the adjustments made really slowed down the opposition offense ... the only plays given up in the 2nd half to Arizona were really a couple of broken plays that hit big. Utah's run game dramatically slowed down in the 2nd half as we brought an extra body into the box and forced Utah to beat us with their passing game. The Oregon game was 70-21 ... I don't read a lot into that. And as for Oregon St, 75 of the 177 yards came on a jet sweep in the 2nd half of a blowout game ... although it was against the #1 defense ... a defense that came out very flat in the 2nd half.
In the last 5 games (Cal, USC, ASU, Wazzu, and Colorado), the yards per rush have been 3.7, 3.1, 0.6, 2.7, and 2.8.
I think even most SEC fans would admit that the QB play in the PAC is usually better than that in the SEC top to bottom in the conference. In conference games, Washington is allowing a completion percentage of 56.5%, 5.8 yards per attempt, and 10.3 yards per completion. In contrast, Alabama's numbers are 52.5% completion percentage against, 6.2 yards per attempt, and 11.9 yards per completion. If there's an area where you could look at the stats and question UW's secondary, it'd be in the completion percentage number as 6 times in 10 conference games have the opposition completed over 60% of their passes. But this also goes to show why completion percentage can be a very misleading stat because when you go back and watch the tape of UW, what you see from them is that they have no problem letting you check it down whether it be screens, rollouts, etc. What they do though extremely well is rally up and tackle those opportunities. Very rarely do you beat a team by making 15+ play drives going 80 yards ... somewhere along the line you're going to get a holding penalty or something to back you behind the sticks or you're going to try to push a pass, etc. that turns into a turnover ... which Washington has averaged over 2 turnovers per game the entire season (they've generated multiple turnovers in every game this season except for the 0 turnovers caused at Utah - hence why that game was relatively close).
The defenses that are probably most similar to UW in the SEC are LSU and maybe Florida ... and the funny thing when you look at those games is that Hurts wasn't really an effective passer:
LSU: 10 of 19 for 107 yards
Florida: 11 of 20 for 138 yards
The keys for this game from a UW perspective:
1) Field Position: Limit turnovers and force Alabama to go a full field on a consistent basis
2) Turnover Margin: +2 or better will give UW the chance to be in the game in the 4th quarter
3) Bring the Alabama defense out of its comfort zone by emphasizing motion and shifts
4) Contain Hurts in the running game and force him to win with his arm
5) Special Teams: Must play at least even here
I definitely think that UW can stay within 2 TDs in this game. The computer models are saying that UW has about a 1 in 3 shot to win the game ... yet the money line in Vegas is UW +575 or thereabouts. That's a lot of value. The public perception is that Alabama is so elite that nobody is in their class ... my perception is that the SEC was a really bad league this year. Alabama is rightly the favorite ... -
He sucks donkey dicks.AuburnFan said:
For realz? I thought he was good?PurpleBaze said:
Doesn't take much to be better than our? Brownsocks.AuburnFan said:
Done, I used the better QB for our upcoming game as my avatarPurpleBaze said:
Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AF, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.AuburnFan said:
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
Y’all arent happy with him? -
This place is fucked up in a good way. You'll get dialled in. Just bring some value and tell DDY to trust the coaches!AuburnFan said:
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:
This post is for our Bama visitor regarding UW and how they match/fit with what Bama does. Most of this stuff will be something that will probably be discussed at length when we record the next edition of the TSIO Podcast next week ... so if you don't like the length of this post, then FUCK OFF!!! and don't read anymore.AuburnFan said:I had fun with the Clemson fans leading up to week 1 last year. Hoping to do the same with you guys. We can trash talk or try to give insight about our teams ... I’m obviously expecting more trash talking (which I’ll dish back out), but if you have serious questions, I’ll answer those as well.
It will be important for UW to put themselves in positions where they always have a check down option(s) for Jake to get rid of the ball in a hurry. 4-5 yard gains against Alabama keep you ahead of the sticks ... that's important. LSU is actually a very important game to watch because it shows what happens when you have a good defense coupled with an offense that does not give Alabama EASY scoring opportunities. That's a good blue print for figuring out how you can stay competitive against Alabama. LSU's biggest problem in that game was that their offense and in particular the QB position was so inept that Alabama didn't respect the passing game much at all and was able to focus on the run game. UW is by far more balanced ... I don't think it's close to a stretch to say that they are the most balanced team Alabama has played all year by a long shot. That will cause some issues for Alabama.
Another thing I've noticed when watching some of the Ole Miss game is that Alabama almost always brings a slot corner or a MLB (or both) in a blitz situation against teams that spread them out. It not only helps to slow down any run situations that may come, but allows the secondary to squat on routes and not be concerned about plays down the field. Picking up those blitzes and giving a pocket will be critical because IF you can get situations where the WRs are 1 on 1 versus the Alabama secondary, you do have opportunities to create some chunk plays. And, the blitzes that Alabama runs really aren't that hard to figure out where they are coming from. They tend to tip the blitz location.
For UW, the LT, LG, and RT are good enough to compete at this level. In the USC game, the LG was coming back from an injury and I do question how healthy he was. We "hopefully" learned a few things from that game that can help us going forward. UW's 2 most basic formations that they run are 2 WR, 2 TE, 1 RB and 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB. Alabama is very strong when you get them in a position where they line up and are able to easily identify their responsibilities. A staple of Chris Petersen's offenses though are shifts and motions and I suspect that we'll try to use those situations to either out-flank or confuse the Alabama defense and get a bust in their assignments. UW has at least 3 TEs that they rotate into the game that all are very good run blockers with Darrell Daniels a potential option if they decide to use him in the passing game (which I think could work very well for UW in this game). I expect our line to be in positions where we will be chipping at least one of the edge rushers each time with the TE before releasing ... the TE releasing should quiet some of the middle blitzes from Alabama. I'd expect the C + RG to combo block a fair amount and our RBs often stay in to block so I'd expect that whichever guard isn't being helped with combo blocking will get focus from the RB.
Alabama is very well coached and very fundamentally sound (that shows up big time compared to other SEC teams and the mistakes that they tend to make play after play). It will be important to use some of that against them by going against tendencies from time to time. To slow Alabama down defensively, you have to get them in a position where they are thinking versus reacting and getting them to question what it is that they are seeing. IF Washington can be successful in this, then you have yourself a ball game.
Defensively, the 3 DTs for Washington (Gaines, Qualls, and Vea) are stout and will be a handful for the Alabama middle run game. As others have noted here, the secondary will be as good as any that Alabama has seen this year. Budda Baker is as good of a safety as there is in the country. The weakness to the defense is at the OLB positions. To slow Alabama's offense down, you have to make Hurts a passer. Kiffin tries to limit the exposure of Hurts by giving him a lot of quick throws and screens to get the ball out and into the hands of playmakers. We're very familiar with that with Kiffin and Sark being from the same tree. The quick WR screens will be hard pressed to work against Jones/King on the outside ... as good of a CB tandem as Alabama has seen all year and one of the best in the nation. Not only are they good in coverage, but they are excellent tacklers particularly in the quick WR screen game. The defense has gotten better since they moved Taylor Rapp in to play S and moved Budda more into a slot corner/rover type of role. IF and this is a big IF Washington can keep Hurts from beating them with his legs, then Washington should be able to limit Alabama's offense.
You've noted in a few different areas looking at yardage totals as a measure of the UW defense and specifically cited certain games and yardage totals. One thing you have to understand about the PAC is that teams here like to push play totals upwards of 80-100 on a game by game basis. It's important to look at things from a yard per play basis when looking at the running and passing games. And I also think it's important to look at things from a conference only or P5 only standpoint versus your entire schedule because the entire schedule can be skewed by a few overmatched opponents.
Washington in conference has given up 4 yards per carry in the run game. The games where UW has given up over 4 yards per carry are as follows:
Arizona: 43 for 308 (7.2 yards per carry)
Oregon: 43 for 230 (5.3 yards per carry)
Oregon St: 30 for 177 (5.9 yards per carry)
Utah: 47 for 213 (4.5 yards per carry)
The Arizona game is unique and probably what they do is most similar to what Auburn runs in that the QB is a massive running threat. 176 of those yards came from Arizona's QB ... which is why I said that the biggest obstacle in this game for the UW defense is stopping Hurts in the run game. There's a lot of read option that Arizona runs and if there's a big weakness to the UW defense at times it is that it doesn't like to change what it does to start games. They will adjust at halftime if needed and against both Arizona and Utah the adjustments made really slowed down the opposition offense ... the only plays given up in the 2nd half to Arizona were really a couple of broken plays that hit big. Utah's run game dramatically slowed down in the 2nd half as we brought an extra body into the box and forced Utah to beat us with their passing game. The Oregon game was 70-21 ... I don't read a lot into that. And as for Oregon St, 75 of the 177 yards came on a jet sweep in the 2nd half of a blowout game ... although it was against the #1 defense ... a defense that came out very flat in the 2nd half.
In the last 5 games (Cal, USC, ASU, Wazzu, and Colorado), the yards per rush have been 3.7, 3.1, 0.6, 2.7, and 2.8.
I think even most SEC fans would admit that the QB play in the PAC is usually better than that in the SEC top to bottom in the conference. In conference games, Washington is allowing a completion percentage of 56.5%, 5.8 yards per attempt, and 10.3 yards per completion. In contrast, Alabama's numbers are 52.5% completion percentage against, 6.2 yards per attempt, and 11.9 yards per completion. If there's an area where you could look at the stats and question UW's secondary, it'd be in the completion percentage number as 6 times in 10 conference games have the opposition completed over 60% of their passes. But this also goes to show why completion percentage can be a very misleading stat because when you go back and watch the tape of UW, what you see from them is that they have no problem letting you check it down whether it be screens, rollouts, etc. What they do though extremely well is rally up and tackle those opportunities. Very rarely do you beat a team by making 15+ play drives going 80 yards ... somewhere along the line you're going to get a holding penalty or something to back you behind the sticks or you're going to try to push a pass, etc. that turns into a turnover ... which Washington has averaged over 2 turnovers per game the entire season (they've generated multiple turnovers in every game this season except for the 0 turnovers caused at Utah - hence why that game was relatively close).
The defenses that are probably most similar to UW in the SEC are LSU and maybe Florida ... and the funny thing when you look at those games is that Hurts wasn't really an effective passer:
LSU: 10 of 19 for 107 yards
Florida: 11 of 20 for 138 yards
The keys for this game from a UW perspective:
1) Field Position: Limit turnovers and force Alabama to go a full field on a consistent basis
2) Turnover Margin: +2 or better will give UW the chance to be in the game in the 4th quarter
3) Bring the Alabama defense out of its comfort zone by emphasizing motion and shifts
4) Contain Hurts in the running game and force him to win with his arm
5) Special Teams: Must play at least even here
That kind of stuff would be good info ... if not for the wrong team and two seasons ago.
I see what you're saying though .... looking forward to seeing meaningless stats and giving some meaningless stats of my own. -
Do those Owens have the highest SPARQ ratings ever like Pappoe?PurpleBaze said: -
-
What kind of crowd do you think you guys will bring to Atlanta? I can't remember what it looked like when UW played Bama in the Playoff in 16, but that was Obviously a bigger game being a Playoff .... with this being a Non-Bowl game (Albeit one of the best Non Conf games of the year), what do you expect your fanbase to look like inside the Dome?
-
AuburnFan said:
What kind of crowd do you think you guys will bring to Atlanta? I can't remember what it looked like when UW played Bama in the Playoff in 16, but that was Obviously a bigger game being a Playoff .... with this being a Non-Bowl game (Albeit one of the best Non Conf games of the year), what do you expect your fanbase to look like inside the Dome?
-
I meant a % .... but I'm game for a Hot TubGrundleStiltzkin said:AuburnFan said:What kind of crowd do you think you guys will bring to Atlanta? I can't remember what it looked like when UW played Bama in the Playoff in 16, but that was Obviously a bigger game being a Playoff .... with this being a Non-Bowl game (Albeit one of the best Non Conf games of the year), what do you expect your fanbase to look like inside the Dome?
-
You said "y'all" so you must be legit and not some dirty duck troll....AuburnFan said:
For realz? I thought he was good?PurpleBaze said:
Doesn't take much to be better than our? Brownsocks.AuburnFan said:
Done, I used the better QB for our upcoming game as my avatarPurpleBaze said:
Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AF, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.AuburnFan said:
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
Y’all arent happy with him? -
No Troll .... Born and raised in Birmingham (lots of bammers around here)DawgWagonDan said:
You said "y'all" so you must be legit and not some dirty duck troll....AuburnFan said:
For realz? I thought he was good?PurpleBaze said:
Doesn't take much to be better than our? Brownsocks.AuburnFan said:
Done, I used the better QB for our upcoming game as my avatarPurpleBaze said:
Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AF, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.AuburnFan said:
Where are the cunt avatars?PurpleBaze said:Get an avatar, cunt!
Y’all arent happy with him?
-
Since you seem like a good sport, here's the key thing you must remember about Husky Football.
-
Y'all beat Idaho?
-
-
Yep, kinda a big deal out here on the Left lololllollool CoastAuburnFan said:Y'all beat Idaho?
-
-
-
I actually think Washington has a shot in this one. An upset would not surprise me.AuburnFan said:I had fun with the Clemson fans leading up to week 1 last year. Hoping to do the same with you guys. We can trash talk or try to give insight about our teams ... I’m obviously expecting more trash talking (which I’ll dish back out), but if you have serious questions, I’ll answer those as well.
Put me down now.
Cook it! I'm bumpin' this mother fucker if it happens. You bess know that now. -
creepycoug said:
I actually think Washington has a shot in this one. An upset would not surprise me.AuburnFan said:I had fun with the Clemson fans leading up to week 1 last year. Hoping to do the same with you guys. We can trash talk or try to give insight about our teams ... I’m obviously expecting more trash talking (which I’ll dish back out), but if you have serious questions, I’ll answer those as well.
Put me down now.
Cook it! I'm bumpin' this mother fucker if it happens. You bess know that now.
-
GrundleStiltzkin said:AuburnFan said:
What kind of crowd do you think you guys will bring to Atlanta? I can't remember what it looked like when UW played Bama in the Playoff in 16, but that was Obviously a bigger game being a Playoff .... with this being a Non-Bowl game (Albeit one of the best Non Conf games of the year), what do you expect your fanbase to look like inside the Dome?
Scouting Report: Guy on the left has healthy and powerful traps...guy on the right has nice big flabby tits...AuburnFan said:
I meant a % .... but I'm game for a Hot TubGrundleStiltzkin said:AuburnFan said:What kind of crowd do you think you guys will bring to Atlanta? I can't remember what it looked like when UW played Bama in the Playoff in 16, but that was Obviously a bigger game being a Playoff .... with this being a Non-Bowl game (Albeit one of the best Non Conf games of the year), what do you expect your fanbase to look like inside the Dome?
but do they got it where it counts...How are their hips!?!1!!11!! Supple and quick? or stiff and slow?
Answer the question! -
Who are you and what have you done with creepy?creepycoug said:
I actually think Washington has a shot in this one. An upset would not surprise me.AuburnFan said:I had fun with the Clemson fans leading up to week 1 last year. Hoping to do the same with you guys. We can trash talk or try to give insight about our teams ... I’m obviously expecting more trash talking (which I’ll dish back out), but if you have serious questions, I’ll answer those as well.
Put me down now.
Cook it! I'm bumpin' this mother fucker if it happens. You bess know that now. -
I mean ... I think it'll be a good game .... I don't think we'll beat y'all bad ... just by 2 or 3 TDs
-
FIXED! AND MAKES MORE SENSE!GrundleStiltzkin said:
This post is for our Bama visitor regarding UW and how they match/fit with what Bama does. Most of this stuff will be something that will probably be discussed at length when we record the next edition of the TSIO Podcast next week ... so if you don't like the length of this post, then FUCK OFF!!! and don't read anymore.AuburnFan said:I had fun with the Clemson fans leading up to week 1 last year. Hoping to do the same with you guys. We can trash talk or try to give insight about our teams ... I’m obviously expecting more trash talking (which I’ll dish back out), but if you have serious questions, I’ll answer those as well.
It will be important for UW to put themselves in positions where they always have a check down option(s) for Jake to get rid of the ball in a hurry. 4-5 yard gains against Alabama keep you ahead of the sticks ... that's important. LSU is actually a very important game to watch because it shows what happens when you have a good defense coupled with an offense that does not give Alabama EASY scoring opportunities. That's a good blue print for figuring out how you can stay competitive against Alabama. LSU's biggest problem in that game was that their offense and in particular the QB position was so inept that Alabama didn't respect the passing game much at all and was able to focus on the run game. UW is by far more balanced ... I don't think it's close to a stretch to say that they are the most balanced team Alabama has played all year by a long shot. That will cause some issues for Alabama.....
This is where you visit your article and how she copied the mat. Most of this will be something that will be discussed next week, the number of podcast TSI records... So if you don't like the length of this post roll away! And read again.
You must have an emergency in a place where you choose to live. It is very important for 4-5 games to burn the game... Alabama. LSU is a very important game that you can use to know when you can protect Alabama and be easy to use with security and violations. Print photos and you can live with Alabama's competitors. The biggest problem with the money in this game is their offense and the situation Alabama QB who is not an ordinary game, focusing on the problem of running the game is particularly serious. The other is quite... I don't know it's easier to say this is a very important team. Arabba played for a long time. This will lead to problems in Alabama.
One of the things I saw when I looked at items in the Mississippi game was that almost every Alabama slot or MLB (or both) was hot for the team. Minimizing management is not only easy, but it can also pull linear teams and won't cover areas. Don't get rid of it, you need to find out less about the case of having 1R1 in Alabama may be secondary. And it's hard to shine in Alabama's work to find the answer here. He often flashes somewhere.
For you, LT, LG and RT have been very good at this level. At the UN Games, LG told him how healthy he was. We hope we can learn in a few games, which can help us to participate. The two most basic two WRs, two TEs, one RB and three WRs, one TE, and one RB. Alabama is hard to find where you are and they can see your responsibility. However, in our campaign Chris Peterson and the main event I doubt we will try to use them to confuse the defense, Alabama or confuse the terms and conditions of their mission. W. At least 3 SPL they face in this game, Daryl Daniels in good manner All blokkeerers are possible if you decide to use him for passing in the game is very good (I think from W. in this Game. I hope our journey can be published in at least one entrance. The release of TE was sent by Alabama. I can expect C + RG to block almost blocks, and RB is always blocked. This is why I can expect an artist to do something to prevent RB technology.
The situation in Alabama has improved and is very common (it always shows the SEC-II team and the biggest mistake shown after the game). You need to use it at some point. To protect yourself from Alabama, you should give them a place to think and ask them what to look for. If Washington applies, you are a football game.
In order to protect them, DTS-3 Washington (Gains, Qualls, Nineveh) they will be a game of medieval rehabilitation in Alabama. As shown here, the second will be like this year's Alabama. Budda Baker is as healthy as he is in the world. Injustice is still at OHB. Alabama, Alabama, repairs for you, you must do harm. Kiffin needs to feel uneasy and give quick and Caucasian sports back to the sportsman. We know Kiffin and Sark from the same tree. Quickly inoculate WRC Battle Will Jones/Gold... and CB Tandem is one of places like Alabama's year-round and world's world. It is not only related to itself, but they are great packages, especially in WR. Protecting them from Tylerup's role as S and Budda role/role-player/rogue. Washington’s Ash and the Great Washington may kill you
You count pirtirkêmtiriya protection in many and many places, especially with some games and some minorities of that level. You need to have a baseball club based on 80-100 based clubs. Find more resources for you to search for and develop games for you based on the game. I think it's important to see all the systems in a meeting or P5 system, because the whole system may expose several bullies.
A four-four-fourth four-wheeled meeting in Washington will be opened to consolidate a ticket. Make your 4 meter movie to make each of them:
Arizona: 43 hours 308 (7.2 meters per load)
Oregon: 43 230 (5.3 million per column)
Oregon St.: 30 of 177 (5.9 million batteries)
Utah: 47 in 213 (four parts)
Erotic games are unique and it is very likely that Auburn will be called because QB is anxious. Of these steps, 176 came from QB to Arizona... so I said I was the biggest obstacle to your UW protection game. Many courses in Arizona are well-study, and sometimes this is a major flaw in UW. It doesn't want to start playing games. I am ready, if necessary, and, if necessary, amendments to the suppression of the opposition in Arizona and Utah... In the play that was broken, at least the truth to Arizona in the second quarter Only individual events. The list in Utah decreased in the second half, when we joined the funeral and passed us with us in Utah. The list of Oregon is 70-21 ... I do not know. And at the age of 75 on Oregon Street, 177 meters of cloud poetriie in the second half of the wokuqubuka game and the protection of ... # 1 ... ... fell to the ground in the second half. .
In the past five games (California, University of Southern California, Arizona State University, Colorado, Vazzani and Speed), 3.7, 3.1, 0.6, 2.7 and 2.8.
I think that PAC security in PAC is usually better than SEC in meeting. Meetings in Washington have reached 56.5% of the total workload, 5.8 million and 10.3 million. In contrast, the Alabama model was 52.5%, 6.2 and 11.9 billion respectively. If you check the statistics and the second question of your question, the number of articles eliminated 6 times has 10 years of objections to objections, at least 60% of the level of debate. However, the final quality of this finalization may be treacherous, because if you look back at the person in charge, what you see, what are the problems, whether there is a screen, etc. What is their best rally to use it. Normally you can start your team from 15+ play 80 feet [80 meters]. In some areas, in a sense, you will find good things on your back, or you will try to pass the minority. Everything is obvious... Washington has a maximum of 2 commands (it plays in the list, no change in Utah, too close).
Protecting it in the SEC LSU, Florida, maybe you... You watch the game, what it hurts is not true patience is successful.
LSU: 10 to 19 to 107 meters
Florida: 11 to 20 to 138 meters
The game is a playback:
1) Legacy status: Al-Qaida and Al-Qaida operate entirely for the entire work.
2) Many traditional +2 or better three-month breakthroughs
3) No movement or movement to protect local security forces in Alabama
4) Get rid of it in the game you want to make and start
5) Private groups: At least play here
I think you live in 2 TDs in this game. Computers said UW has played 1 game in 3 games... but fake respect is +575 or higher in Vegas. This is very important. Public opinion believes that Alabama is so big that some of them are. I believe the SEC is the worst member. Alabama really likes...