The most trusted news Network

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

Is anyone surprised or shocked somebody came back from Vietnam followed by law school to some tiny town in Alabama in the 1970s to find the only single girls under 300 lbs were probably 1/3 of the graduating seniors that weren't already married?

As for the rest I have no clue...only thing I know is that this specific lady is crazy and her story has fallen apart. Putting her up as a reason against Moore only helps him. I can make a pretty good guess that whoever the WP reporter is that started this is a political nutjob too.

As for Moore...he's anything but the best and the brightest, but that can be said of his opponent and definitely can be said of his future coworkers, which include a fake Indian, a socialist that use to write about rape fantasies, and an actual pedophile that you keep ignoring in your campaign to cure the world of evils.

HondoFS...Pedophile apologist.

Komo4?

And yes you would still rather vote for a pedophile than a prosecutor that put pedophiles in jail.

Nice work. You seriously can't say "dude doesn't belong in Congress" can you? All because the R.

Or, perhaps there's still this concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' and 'due process'.

There's a very strong likelihood that something happened that involved Moore and a minor. But no charges, 40 years passing, etc. That's reasonable doubt in a courtroom.

Unproven allegations are as old in politics as @RaceBannon . If every accusation automatically caused a candidate to step aside, well...Slick Willy. This is not much different.

LIFPO is the correct answer here. If he's ultimately convicted of a criminal act, the Senate has the ability to censure him and either force him to resign or the Alabamans who cast their vote for Moore can recall him.

But Franken doesn't need to be convicted of a criminal act? The more you talk, the more of a Republican shill you look. And a pedophile apologist.

Not my fault Franken didn't LIFPO. I'd have given him the same courtesy with regard to due process. The Throbber only shills for Jew boobs (IKW).

Franken hasn't resigned either, BTW.

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

Is anyone surprised or shocked somebody came back from Vietnam followed by law school to some tiny town in Alabama in the 1970s to find the only single girls under 300 lbs were probably 1/3 of the graduating seniors that weren't already married?

As for the rest I have no clue...only thing I know is that this specific lady is crazy and her story has fallen apart. Putting her up as a reason against Moore only helps him. I can make a pretty good guess that whoever the WP reporter is that started this is a political nutjob too.

As for Moore...he's anything but the best and the brightest, but that can be said of his opponent and definitely can be said of his future coworkers, which include a fake Indian, a socialist that use to write about rape fantasies, and an actual pedophile that you keep ignoring in your campaign to cure the world of evils.

HondoFS...Pedophile apologist.

Komo4?

And yes you would still rather vote for a pedophile than a prosecutor that put pedophiles in jail.

Nice work. You seriously can't say "dude doesn't belong in Congress" can you? All because the R.

Or, perhaps there's still this concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' and 'due process'.

There's a very strong likelihood that something happened that involved Moore and a minor. But no charges, 40 years passing, etc. That's reasonable doubt in a courtroom.

Unproven allegations are as old in politics as @RaceBannon . If every accusation automatically caused a candidate to step aside, well...Slick Willy. This is not much different.

LIFPO is the correct answer here. If he's ultimately convicted of a criminal act, the Senate has the ability to censure him and either force him to resign or the Alabamans who cast their vote for Moore can recall him.

But Franken doesn't need to be convicted of a criminal act? The more you talk, the more of a Republican shill you look. And a pedophile apologist.

Not my fault Franken didn't LIFPO. I'd have given him the same courtesy with regard to due process. The Throbber only shills for Jew boobs (IKW).

Franken hasn't resigned either, BTW.

Guysm, guysm, guysm, not in the middle of the store.

Basic point of parliamentary procedure here fellas: we're not in court and nobody is prosecuting anyone. Please, leave the pretend lawyering to me. This talk of burden of proof, due process, etc. is for actual court; it is inapposite to the court of public opinion.

Remember my fellow thespians, people who want a seat in the Senate usually have to talk us into giving it to them. There's no burden of proof on the public ... that's why politicians like to keep their dirty laundry in the laundry room. Moore's spilled out into the hall.

That interview with Hannity ALONE should have Matt Lauer'd his career. We all know why it didn't: he's running on a voting base comprised of people who are generally (1) stupid, (2) reactionary, (3) easily swayed, (4) socially backwards and (5) stupid. As the man who poisoned the oaks at Auburn said, "I just got too much bama in me."

If you are on this bored trying to support this loon, you are (a) taking hondonumbers too seriously and (b) working way too hard. I know Moore promised you that he'd repeal Obama care and cut taxes and do a bunch of other super important shit, but here's the deal - there are a thousand other dipshits in the southeast to choose from who will do all of those things and not have to explain away the 12-year old girl issues. FIND ANOTHER CANDIDATE!!!!!!!!!!

Come on. Get it together guysm. I expect this from doogie and krisvashon and d2d, wherever he is, and pretty much nobody else. I"m sure even sleds himself is off somewhere having a laff over this one.

creepycoug said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

HoustonHusky said:

Is anyone surprised or shocked somebody came back from Vietnam followed by law school to some tiny town in Alabama in the 1970s to find the only single girls under 300 lbs were probably 1/3 of the graduating seniors that weren't already married?

As for the rest I have no clue...only thing I know is that this specific lady is crazy and her story has fallen apart. Putting her up as a reason against Moore only helps him. I can make a pretty good guess that whoever the WP reporter is that started this is a political nutjob too.

As for Moore...he's anything but the best and the brightest, but that can be said of his opponent and definitely can be said of his future coworkers, which include a fake Indian, a socialist that use to write about rape fantasies, and an actual pedophile that you keep ignoring in your campaign to cure the world of evils.

HondoFS...Pedophile apologist.

Komo4?

And yes you would still rather vote for a pedophile than a prosecutor that put pedophiles in jail.

Nice work. You seriously can't say "dude doesn't belong in Congress" can you? All because the R.

Or, perhaps there's still this concept of 'innocent until proven guilty' and 'due process'.

There's a very strong likelihood that something happened that involved Moore and a minor. But no charges, 40 years passing, etc. That's reasonable doubt in a courtroom.

Unproven allegations are as old in politics as @RaceBannon . If every accusation automatically caused a candidate to step aside, well...Slick Willy. This is not much different.

LIFPO is the correct answer here. If he's ultimately convicted of a criminal act, the Senate has the ability to censure him and either force him to resign or the Alabamans who cast their vote for Moore can recall him.

But Franken doesn't need to be convicted of a criminal act? The more you talk, the more of a Republican shill you look. And a pedophile apologist.

Not my fault Franken didn't LIFPO. I'd have given him the same courtesy with regard to due process. The Throbber only shills for Jew boobs (IKW).

Franken hasn't resigned either, BTW.

Guysm, guysm, guysm, not in the middle of the store.

Basic point of parliamentary procedure here fellas: we're not in court and nobody is prosecuting anyone. Please, leave the pretend lawyering to me. This talk of burden of proof, due process, etc. is for actual court; it is inapposite to the court of public opinion.

Remember my fellow thespians, people who want a seat in the Senate usually have to talk us into giving it to them. There's no burden of proof on the public ... that's why politicians like to keep their dirty laundry in the laundry room. Moore's spilled out into the hall.

That interview with Hannity ALONE should have Matt Lauer'd his career. We all know why it didn't: he's running on a voting base comprised of people who are generally (1) stupid, (2) reactionary, (3) easily swayed, (4) socially backwards and (5) stupid. As the man who poisoned the oaks at Auburn said, "I just got too much bama in me."

If you are on this bored trying to support this loon, you are (a) taking hondonumbers too seriously and (b) working way too hard. I know Moore promised you that he'd repeal Obama care and cut taxes and do a bunch of other super important shit, but here's the deal - there are a thousand other dipshits in the southeast to choose from who will do all of those things and not have to explain away the 12-year old girl issues. FIND ANOTHER CANDIDATE!!!!!!!!!!

Come on. Get it together guysm. I expect this from doogie and krisvashon and d2d, wherever he is, and pretty much nobody else. I"m sure even sleds himself is off somewhere having a laff over this one.

If the Bammers want to elect him, so be it.

If they don't want to, so be it as well.

As I said, he probably did do something with some young lass. All that said, Jake Browning sucks, we(?) are venturing down a slippery slope when allegations carry more weight than the judicial system or the power of the voting booth.

HoustonHusky said:

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/11/the_bob_menendez_case_a_double_standard_for_dems.html

Pedophile apologist. I look forward to your 50+ poasts calling for his head now.

And no, I don't think Moore, Doug Jones, Pocohantas, McCain, Menendez, and about 60 other current Senators (much less a ton more Reps) should be there...but I don't have a whole lot of say in the matter.

Equivocate much?

One of those people is a pedo, the rest are not. Say what you want about the rest, but Moore is uniquely unqualified.

This is not hard to understand.