Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

DDY & Coker

2456789

Comments

  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    jecornel said:

    dnc said:

    Oh and Pete will be competing for the playoff more than once or twice the next decade.

    What makes you think that? He pissed this season away. I mean, what a waste. Have a FG kicker who can put away a 30 yard kick. Down right pathetic.

    Pete had a mixture of Sark recruits he probably would have never gotten to come to Washington and was able to sneak into the playoffs last year. Like DDY said, Pete is the one who needs to get out of his comfort zone and change his philosophy. Don James did it in 1988 so I guess Pete could?

    If this staff doesn't kill it instate between 2019-2021 then he isn't sniffing another playoff. If Pete continues to recruit the Haener's & the Harris' of the world then the program is fucked. We all know there is no way Yankoff and Sirmon are both here all four years. One will win the job and the other will bail. So the one who sticks better pan out and you better have another QB on deck to push the starter. Like the TSIO guys are saying, Jake has not had to look over his shoulder.

    The point I was making about recruiting in the South, is you better have strong fucking inroads to spend valuable time there.

    Ya, next year the secondary should be solid, but if you are sieve in the trenches then it makes everyone's job a lot harder. If Gaines leaves the depth will be beyond razor thin. Who do you have behind Jaylen & Levi? McCoy & Pulu?
    Calm down little Jimmy. I know you absorb whatever you are hearing like a sponge without any critical thought but let’s think about this for a second.

    Yes, our recruiting potential is higher than our recruiting reality.

    No, we didn’t go to the playoff on the backs of Sark recruits in year 3.

    No, our talent levels are not dropping. Every class has been a little bit better.

    No, we aren’t going to be perennially 8-4 to 10-2. Coker and DDY are talking about what is needed to get us to the elite level not the top of our shit conference.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,640

    jecornel said:

    dnc said:

    I didn't listen. They're calling for 4 to 5 couch sales?

    Yeah right.

    Smith needs to go. Malloe needs to go. I assume this means they're after Gregory, Bonerpoppa and...not sure who else? Obviously not Lake, K, Huff or Lubick. Are they out on PaoPaoPao?

    If they fire Smith and Malloe that's enough for me and I'd be thrilled with that. I disagree with the newfound Gregory hate. I'm neutral on Bonerpopper. Wouldn't be tore up if he was fired but he seems to be pretty damn good at coaching them up.

    I agree with you. I may be willing to keep Milloe as he seems to be a pretty good technique coach. Use the new tenth coaching position to bring in an ace recruiter that concentrates on Bucks and interior defensive lineman. Let mystery coach A bring them in and let Kawasaki and Milloe continue to coach them up as Both are dead fish on the trail. Let Smiff figuratively DIAFF.
    Who the fuck is Milloe?
    Who the fuck is Kawasaki? Who the fuck is Smiff? I? A? Fuck off. Vowels like stats are for losers.
    I don't know who any of those guys are but I hear they associate with a guy named Bonerpopper
  • NorwegianHusky
    NorwegianHusky Member Posts: 3,426

    For me personally I’d fire: Smith, Malloe, Gregory, and Paopao (don’t really care one way or the other on Paopao though), and the 5th coach would be the coach we need to hire anyways for the 10th spot.

    I just don’t see Gregory doing anywhere near enough on the recruiting front to elevate us, that’s all.

    And concerning Sirmon, I have no desire for him to be our DC ever. But I’d love to have him on staff recruiting and coaching LB’s or DL depending on what position we need to fill.

    I just want coaches that are good at both coaching and recruiting. We just don’t have guys connecting on the recruiting front, that’s my biggest issue currently.

    All fair. I don't disagree with any of this.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    edited November 2017
    Tequilla said:

    For me personally I’d fire: Smith, Malloe, Gregory, and Paopao (don’t really care one way or the other on Paopao though), and the 5th coach would be the coach we need to hire anyways for the 10th spot.

    I just don’t see Gregory doing anywhere near enough on the recruiting front to elevate us, that’s all.

    And concerning Sirmon, I have no desire for him to be our DC ever. But I’d love to have him on staff recruiting and coaching LB’s or DL depending on what position we need to fill.

    I just want coaches that are good at both coaching and recruiting. We just don’t have guys connecting on the recruiting front, that’s my biggest issue currently.

    You act like recruiting has been bad ... we are getting arguably as good of recruiting classes that we have ever had. Can it be better ... always. But it’s far from broken.

    No arguments on Babushka and Malloe for reasons well documented.

    I have no compelling reason for/against Paopao ... he’s roughly done what he should do and falls in Bonerpopper territory to me (Boner better tho) ...

    Gregory is a good coach both for LBs and Special Teams ... don’t make the mistake of devaluing good coaching. Could we use a 10th coach like Sirmon that has a LB background that is a recruiting upgrade? Sure.

    I can look at Lubick and see solid recruiting ... can I see solid coaching yet? The WRs may be the most disappointing positional group on the team.

    You also have to be looking at what messages you are sending to your staff as well in any changes ... if you aspire to have stability you also have to promote it ... it’s a 2 way street

    Firing 4+ coaches is crazy to me ... it’s not broken to that degree ... calling for that kind of turnover is easy when you don’t have to deal with the reprocussions
    Its not good enough for me, I believe we can do better.