DDY & Coker

Dennis_DeYoung

This whole debate is riddled with the doog narrative that in a top 10 program coaches cannot be expected to be great recruiters and great position coaches.

This is obviously not the case and Saban would never put up with it (and—in fact, he doesn't). The funny thing is that people who think Saban is the bee's knees are here arguing against what he does.

There is no god damn reason to keep anyone on this fucking mediocre offense. How could there be?

The defense needs a massive talent upgrade to be elite.

What would Saban do? Saban only has guys who are great position coaches and great recruiters.

Any arguing for low standards are just doogs trying not to get their hopes up.

And for the 'recruiting doesn't matter' crowd - DIAFF. Saban spends all his fucking time recruiting.

backthepack

Dennis_DeYoung said:

This whole debate is riddled with the doog narrative that in a top 10 program coaches cannot be expected to be great recruiters and great position coaches.

This is obviously not the case and Saban would never put up with it (and—in fact, he doesn't). The funny thing is that people who think Saban is the bee's knees are here arguing against what he does.

There is no god damn reason to keep anyone on this fucking mediocre offense. How could there be?

The defense needs a massive talent upgrade to be elite.

What would Saban do? Saban only has guys who are great position coaches and great recruiters.

Any arguing for low standards are just doogs trying not to get their hopes up.

And for the 'recruiting doesn't matter' crowd - DIAFF. Saban spends all his fucking time recruiting.

I love you Dennis.

RoadDawg55

Dennis_DeYoung said:

This whole debate is riddled with the doog narrative that in a top 10 program coaches cannot be expected to be great recruiters and great position coaches.

This is obviously not the case and Saban would never put up with it (and—in fact, he doesn't). The funny thing is that people who think Saban is the bee's knees are here arguing against what he does.

There is no god damn reason to keep anyone on this fucking mediocre offense. How could there be?

The defense needs a massive talent upgrade to be elite.

What would Saban do? Saban only has guys who are great position coaches and great recruiters.

Any arguing for low standards are just doogs trying not to get their hopes up.

And for the 'recruiting doesn't matter' crowd - DIAFF. Saban spends all his fucking time recruiting.

Holy fuck. Nobody thinks recruiting doesn’t matter. Everyone knows it matters. Most just aren’t as obsessed as you are.

I had to look up Alabama’s assistants. I doubt all are great recruiters and it’s an apples and oranges comparison.

You just talked up Lubbick and said Huff could stay, but in the above post you say we should can the whole offensive staff. Which one is it?

backthepack

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

This whole debate is riddled with the doog narrative that in a top 10 program coaches cannot be expected to be great recruiters and great position coaches.

This is obviously not the case and Saban would never put up with it (and—in fact, he doesn't). The funny thing is that people who think Saban is the bee's knees are here arguing against what he does.

There is no god damn reason to keep anyone on this fucking mediocre offense. How could there be?

The defense needs a massive talent upgrade to be elite.

What would Saban do? Saban only has guys who are great position coaches and great recruiters.

Any arguing for low standards are just doogs trying not to get their hopes up.

And for the 'recruiting doesn't matter' crowd - DIAFF. Saban spends all his fucking time recruiting.

Holy fuck. Nobody thinks recruiting doesn’t matter. Everyone knows it matters. Most just aren’t as obsessed as you are.

I had to look up Alabama’s assistants. I doubt all are great recruiters and it’s an apples and oranges comparison.

You just talked up Lubbick and said Huff could stay, but in the above post you say we should can the whole offensive staff. Which one is it?

RoadDoogFS Bama has great crooters' all over. Bagmen would help, HCH crootin' fund for next year? I'll pitch with 10 bucks and some nacho cheese fondue.

Dennis_DeYoung

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

This whole debate is riddled with the doog narrative that in a top 10 program coaches cannot be expected to be great recruiters and great position coaches.

This is obviously not the case and Saban would never put up with it (and—in fact, he doesn't). The funny thing is that people who think Saban is the bee's knees are here arguing against what he does.

There is no god damn reason to keep anyone on this fucking mediocre offense. How could there be?

The defense needs a massive talent upgrade to be elite.

What would Saban do? Saban only has guys who are great position coaches and great recruiters.

Any arguing for low standards are just doogs trying not to get their hopes up.

And for the 'recruiting doesn't matter' crowd - DIAFF. Saban spends all his fucking time recruiting.

Holy fuck. Nobody thinks recruiting doesn’t matter. Everyone knows it matters. Most just aren’t as obsessed as you are.

I had to look up Alabama’s assistants. I doubt all are great recruiters and it’s an apples and oranges comparison.

You just talked up Lubbick and said Huff could stay, but in the above post you say we should can the whole offensive staff. Which one is it?

Are you FS?

oregonblitzkrieg

Competing for a playoff spot once or twice every 10 years is about the most a Pac 12 team can aspire to generally.

AZDuck

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Competing for a playoff spot once or twice every 10 years is about the most a Pac 12 team can aspire to generally.

Fag

oregonblitzkrieg

AZDuck said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

Competing for a playoff spot once or twice every 10 years is about the most a Pac 12 team can aspire to generally.

Fag

You sound hurt. Don't like it, take some courses at Bama or some other big boy program so you can be a fan of a school that actually wins the big games instead of just getting there and shitting the bed.

Fear_Boner

Under Petersen UW can win multiple titles IF he pulls the ripcord on Smith and that piece of shit recruiter Malloe.

If we stick with that fucktard Babushka and we play two B level DT’s then we may make the playoffs from time to time but that’s all.

I’m not happy thinking the pinnacle is and always will be 1991.

We can and will do better.

In Pete I trust.

oregonblitzkrieg

Fear_Boner said:

Under Petersen UW can win multiple titles IF he pulls the ripcord on Smith and that piece of shit recruiter Malloe.

If we stick with that fucktard Babushka and we play two B level DT’s then we may make the playoffs from time to time but that’s all.

I’m not happy thinking the pinnacle is and always will be 1991.

We can and will do better.

In Pete I trust.

Pete isn't Saban, not even close. Even if he were, he's in the northwest, he would never be able to pull in the recruits that teams from the South can. You won't be winning a title with him, much less multiple ones. If Chip can't do it, Pete sure as fuck can't. Also, 1991 wasn't the pinnacle. 2016 was. It was the closest you ever came to actually getting to play in your first championship game and maybe winning a trophy that you would have earned instead of one you were voted to share with another team you never actually played on the field.