FS Great Compromise of 1787 - Looking at the numbers
Comments
-
We need a wall. On the California/Oregon border. Keep you buttfuckers outta the north.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s interesting how American progress, ingenuity and success played out over the the 20th century, attrituable in large part to the passion of our immigrants — basque, Slav, German, Irish, Mexican... we made america great. Now the narrow-minded, unskilled, and uneducated say we need to build a “wall”YellowSnow said:
Agree to some extent pyrrhic aspect. I lived in SD till '92 and my Dad's business was definitely affected. Brutal recession. My point is, however, is that in spite of retooling themselves, CA probably wouldn't be where it is today without big government defense spending. Silicon Valley don't happen the way it did w/o Ruskies launching Webber BBQ's into outer space.CirrhosisDawg said:
Understood. Post WWII and cold war military spending created a pyrrhic cal economy: George, Norton, Sacramento, alameda, el segundo, et al all closed. I lived through it. Point is CA reformed and educated itself. We didn’t bitch and cry like today’s entitled white trash. Led by our institutions of higher education, we re-skilled and once again lead the workd economy based on an entirely revamped and highly skilled work force. Tromps can fuck off. They will get what they deserve. Ultimately.YellowSnow said:
Question for your busted liver Dawg: What state in the US would you say received the largest share (on a per capita basis) of Cold War era defense spending (which was critical to said state becoming the economic powerhouse that it is today)? Tax payer largesse is a 2 way street throughout our history.CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. the vast majority of CA will see why federalism is the answer.RaceBannon said:Eliminating the state tax deduction is brilliant
Ryan losing the house is the most likely scenario.
The uneducated, unskilled and unproductive don’t want CA’s benevolence.
It’s time to let them all go. Good luck.
Fuck that. Fuck off.
CA independence. -
Rare time when we agree. I too would like to see California go.CirrhosisDawg said:
There’s a path to a rational tax and spending policy. Unfortunately, It’s not happening any time soon with the DC shit show.YellowSnow said:
The flip side to this coin is those of us living in non income states subsidizing the high state income taxes in places like CA. When prison guards are getting those ridiculous pensions, it tells me the average CA tax payer is being overbilled (yes, this is an over generalization, but you get the idea).CirrhosisDawg said:It’s clear where US law is headed in the absence of any sensible public policy direction.
— thoughtless GOP tax reform (under which cal taxable income earners of $200k pay an additional $2,000 per person or so subsidy to red states)
— isolationist economic and trade policies
— mindless nationalist, populist and “Christian” rentrenchment.
Troomps need educated, skilled and productive California more than we need you.
I am a Californian.
The tax code is like the Papacy selling indulgences and in general it should be made to be as neutral as possible.
CA independence. -
Your benevolence is, um.... yeah.CirrhosisDawg said:
Understood. Post WWII and cold war military spending created a pyrrhic cal economy: George, Norton, Sacramento, alameda, el segundo, et al all closed. I lived through it. Point is CA reformed and educated itself. We didn’t bitch and cry like today’s entitled white trash. Led by our institutions of higher education, we re-skilled and once again lead the world economy based on an entirely revamped and highly skilled work force. Troomps can fuck off. They will get what they deserve. Ultimately.YellowSnow said:
Question for your busted liver Dawg: What state in the US would you say received the largest share (on a per capita basis) of Cold War era defense spending (which was critical to said state becoming the economic powerhouse that it is today)? Tax payer largesse is a 2 way street throughout our history.CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. the vast majority of CA will see why federalism is the answer.RaceBannon said:Eliminating the state tax deduction is brilliant
Ryan losing the house is the most likely scenario.
The uneducated, unskilled and unproductive don’t want CA’s benevolence.
It’s time to let them all go. Good luck.
You sound bitter. -
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
-
UCI acquittal?AZDuck said:PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW. -
You leave out how those "builders" came here legally and it only proves others will do the work illegals are stealing.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s interesting how American progress, ingenuity and success played out over the the 20th century, attrituable in large part to the passion of our immigrants — basque, Slav, German, Irish, Mexican... we made america great. Now the narrow-minded, unskilled, and uneducated say we need to build a “wall”YellowSnow said:
Agree to some extent pyrrhic aspect. I lived in SD till '92 and my Dad's business was definitely affected. Brutal recession. My point is, however, is that in spite of retooling themselves, CA probably wouldn't be where it is today without big government defense spending. Silicon Valley don't happen the way it did w/o Ruskies launching Webber BBQ's into outer space.CirrhosisDawg said:
Understood. Post WWII and cold war military spending created a pyrrhic cal economy: George, Norton, Sacramento, alameda, el segundo, et al all closed. I lived through it. Point is CA reformed and educated itself. We didn’t bitch and cry like today’s entitled white trash. Led by our institutions of higher education, we re-skilled and once again lead the workd economy based on an entirely revamped and highly skilled work force. Tromps can fuck off. They will get what they deserve. Ultimately.YellowSnow said:
Question for your busted liver Dawg: What state in the US would you say received the largest share (on a per capita basis) of Cold War era defense spending (which was critical to said state becoming the economic powerhouse that it is today)? Tax payer largesse is a 2 way street throughout our history.CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. the vast majority of CA will see why federalism is the answer.RaceBannon said:Eliminating the state tax deduction is brilliant
Ryan losing the house is the most likely scenario.
The uneducated, unskilled and unproductive don’t want CA’s benevolence.
It’s time to let them all go. Good luck.
Fuck that. Fuck off.
CA independence. -
CA could probably actually get by on its own water supply (i.e., no more Colorado River imports) if they were not such a bunch of tree huggers and would build more reservoirs, get more of the So Cal rainfall (yes they get a fair bit) stored in aquifers, plus maybe some more desalinization plants. There's a lot of water in the state; it's just about storing it properly and moving it from point A to B. Some farmers would have to be bought ought to which would be expensive.salemcoog said:
So if gurgle is the drown sound. What sound would best describe your State cut off from outside water?CirrhosisDawg said:
Understood. Post WWII and cold war military spending created a pyrrhic cal economy: George, Norton, Sacramento, alameda, el segundo, et al all closed. I lived through it. Point is CA reformed and educated itself. We didn’t bitch and cry like today’s entitled white trash. Led by our institutions of higher education, we re-skilled and once again lead the world economy based on an entirely revamped and highly skilled work force. Troomps can fuck off. They will get what they deserve. Ultimately.YellowSnow said:
Question for your busted liver Dawg: What state in the US would you say received the largest share (on a per capita basis) of Cold War era defense spending (which was critical to said state becoming the economic powerhouse that it is today)? Tax payer largesse is a 2 way street throughout our history.CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. the vast majority of CA will see why federalism is the answer.RaceBannon said:Eliminating the state tax deduction is brilliant
Ryan losing the house is the most likely scenario.
The uneducated, unskilled and unproductive don’t want CA’s benevolence.
It’s time to let them all go. Good luck.
Crackle???
Plus no one wants your dirty Willamette water anyhow which is polluted with Salem bum piss, fecal matter and full blow AIDS. -
Mainly just LA. I like the restSwaye said:
Rare time when we agree. I too would like to see California go.CirrhosisDawg said:
There’s a path to a rational tax and spending policy. Unfortunately, It’s not happening any time soon with the DC shit show.YellowSnow said:
The flip side to this coin is those of us living in non income states subsidizing the high state income taxes in places like CA. When prison guards are getting those ridiculous pensions, it tells me the average CA tax payer is being overbilled (yes, this is an over generalization, but you get the idea).CirrhosisDawg said:It’s clear where US law is headed in the absence of any sensible public policy direction.
— thoughtless GOP tax reform (under which cal taxable income earners of $200k pay an additional $2,000 per person or so subsidy to red states)
— isolationist economic and trade policies
— mindless nationalist, populist and “Christian” rentrenchment.
Troomps need educated, skilled and productive California more than we need you.
I am a Californian.
The tax code is like the Papacy selling indulgences and in general it should be made to be as neutral as possible.
CA independence.
-
and heroin. lots and lots of heroin.YellowSnow said:
CA could probably actually get by on its own water supply (i.e., no more Colorado River imports) if they were not such a bunch of tree huggers and would build more reservoirs, get more of the So Cal rainfall (yes they get a fair bit) stored in aquifers, plus maybe some more desalinization plants. There's a lot of water in the state; it's just about storing it properly and moving it from point A to B. Some farmers would have to be bought ought to which would be expensive.salemcoog said:
So if gurgle is the drown sound. What sound would best describe your State cut off from outside water?CirrhosisDawg said:
Understood. Post WWII and cold war military spending created a pyrrhic cal economy: George, Norton, Sacramento, alameda, el segundo, et al all closed. I lived through it. Point is CA reformed and educated itself. We didn’t bitch and cry like today’s entitled white trash. Led by our institutions of higher education, we re-skilled and once again lead the world economy based on an entirely revamped and highly skilled work force. Troomps can fuck off. They will get what they deserve. Ultimately.YellowSnow said:
Question for your busted liver Dawg: What state in the US would you say received the largest share (on a per capita basis) of Cold War era defense spending (which was critical to said state becoming the economic powerhouse that it is today)? Tax payer largesse is a 2 way street throughout our history.CirrhosisDawg said:
Agree. the vast majority of CA will see why federalism is the answer.RaceBannon said:Eliminating the state tax deduction is brilliant
Ryan losing the house is the most likely scenario.
The uneducated, unskilled and unproductive don’t want CA’s benevolence.
It’s time to let them all go. Good luck.
Crackle???
Plus no one wants your dirty Willamette water anyhow which is polluted with Salem bum piss, fecal matter and full blow AIDS. -
Fuck off. Electoral college is there for a reason, to prevent NY and CA from deciding every election. You lost you fucking crybaby. Fair and square. The rules are the rules. Did your mommy change them every time your spoilt ass started crying and threw a tantrum?AZDuck said:PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.
PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION NOW.






