Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
This is a GOOD Washington team
Comments
-
If wanting to fuck the Falk sisters is wrong, I don't want to be right.Swaye said:
Not gonne lie, I've got this weird 1982 vibe thing going with the Apple Cup. WSU as season killer giving them a reason to live, besides fucking their sisters, for the next decade and a half.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Still got to win two tough games in California.
-
There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.
But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing. -
82 was in Pullman thoughSwaye said:
Not gonne lie, I've got this weird 1982 vibe thing going with the Apple Cup. WSU as season killer giving them a reason to live, besides fucking their sisters, for the next decade and a half.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Still got to win two tough games in California. -
The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.phineas said:There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.
But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.
This conference is shit until proven otherwise. -
Not our problem.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.phineas said:There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.
But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.
This conference is shit until proven otherwise. -
Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.phineas said:The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.
Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose. -
It's *our* problem when we shit the bed against them.phineas said:
Not our problem.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.phineas said:There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.
But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.
This conference is shit until proven otherwise.
-
Stanford is worse than they were last year. Power teams with shitty players arent going to beat Washington. Power teams with top talent like USC or Alabama is the problem.Southerndawg said:
Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.phineas said:The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.
Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
Or, teams with a talented quarterback that expect to win. Stanford is none of those. Arizona would be a bigger problem than stanford. -
ASU doesn't have powerful anything and they beat Washington.phineas said:
Stanford is worse than they were last year. Power teams with shitty players isn't going to be Washington. Power teams with top talent like USC or Alabama is the problem.Southerndawg said:
Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.phineas said:The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.
Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
Or, teams with a talented quarterback that expect to win. Stanford is none of those. Arizona would be a bigger problem than stanford. -
No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
-
Asu has talent and a desert. Washington may never win there againTierbsHsotBoobs said:
ASU doesn't have powerful anything and they beat Washington.phineas said:
Stanford is worse than they were last year. Power teams with shitty players isn't going to be Washington. Power teams with top talent like USC or Alabama is the problem.Southerndawg said:
Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.phineas said:The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.
Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
Or, teams with a talented quarterback that expect to win. Stanford is none of those. Arizona would be a bigger problem than stanford. -
Don't get me wrong, I expect to push those fags shit in all over the field. But, I am old enough to recall some of the WSU as spoiler when those cow tippers ruin a great season of ours for no good reason.Gwad said:
82 was in Pullman thoughSwaye said:
Not gonne lie, I've got this weird 1982 vibe thing going with the Apple Cup. WSU as season killer giving them a reason to live, besides fucking their sisters, for the next decade and a half.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Still got to win two tough games in California. -
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen. -
We (?) Played a Big 10 team, an MWC team, and a local shit team. Fairly standard. But even if you replaced Montana with, say Virginia, and Fresno with Boise (actual downgrade but looks better on paper) the schedule would look better. Do you think the record would be worse?gmo said:someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...
No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year. -
USC played Notre Dame, Texas, and Western Michigan.Alexis said:
We (?) Played a Big 10 team, an MWC team, and a local shit team. Fairly standard. But even if you replaced Montana with, say Virginia, and Fresno with Boise (actual downgrade but looks better on paper) the schedule would look better. Do you think the record would be worse?gmo said:someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...
No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year.
But still. -
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen. -
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them. -
My Dawgs been blacked out for 3 days Gooooooooooooooo!TierbsHsotBoobs said:If UW shits the bed against Stanford, this thread should be pinned forever to save everyone the effort of bumping it.
In all seriousness, Jake Browning still sucks, but Stanford is the last real game of the season. Win that and it's a date with USC with the playoffs on the line. Fuck wazzu they suck. Petersen is more than six inches in Leaches Ass and we all know what that means.
Walking into Qwest right now, leggo! -
WSU will have something to play for against a Chris Petersen team, so I'm not even mildly worried about it. Plus, we will most likely be 10-1 going into the AC.
It's going to be a good atmosphere. Doesn't worry me any more than any other game - which means I think we'll lose by 40. But still... -
lolTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them.
you stamp your foot and yammer the same shit in every thread on every subforum every hour of every day. UW being good is like the equivalent of pouring water on a CPU with you. at least be funny or something
nor are you self aware enough to see that you're entirely on an island and no one agrees with your myriad spergings anyway
go outside -
I don't care if you agree with me or not. In fact, I don't expect Doogs like you to agree with me.Gladstone said:
lolTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them.
you stamp your foot and yammer the same shit in every thread on every subforum every hour of every day. UW being good is like the equivalent of pouring water on a CPU with you. at least be funny or something
nor are you self aware enough to see that you're entirely on an island and no one agrees with your myriad spergings anyway
go outside
I'm right. That's all that matters.
-
UW deserves to be shit on for their loss. Going in you think you lose to a RELOADED Colorado or rejuvenated Stanford on the road. Not fucking Graham.Gladstone said:
lolTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them.
you stamp your foot and yammer the same shit in every thread on every subforum every hour of every day. UW being good is like the equivalent of pouring water on a CPU with you. at least be funny or something
nor are you self aware enough to see that you're entirely on an island and no one agrees with your myriad spergings anyway
go outside
And is it that the conference is worse than the other 4 or just that “we beat each other up in this conference.”
I watch the Stanford/Wazzu game and unfortunately it’s probably the former. -
How many wins did ND and Texas combine for last year? Good schedule for them this year. Great for them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
USC played Notre Dame, Texas, and Western Michigan.Alexis said:
We (?) Played a Big 10 team, an MWC team, and a local shit team. Fairly standard. But even if you replaced Montana with, say Virginia, and Fresno with Boise (actual downgrade but looks better on paper) the schedule would look better. Do you think the record would be worse?gmo said:someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...
No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year.
But still.
Good luck getting Texas to play a home and home with UW.
And of course, if I felt like doing research, I could shitpoast a bunch of other top 20 teams with shitty non conference schedules also. But yeah. SC is the norm. -
You're the idiot that said "No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year."Alexis said:
How many wins did ND and Texas combine for last year? Good schedule for them this year. Great for them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
USC played Notre Dame, Texas, and Western Michigan.Alexis said:
We (?) Played a Big 10 team, an MWC team, and a local shit team. Fairly standard. But even if you replaced Montana with, say Virginia, and Fresno with Boise (actual downgrade but looks better on paper) the schedule would look better. Do you think the record would be worse?gmo said:someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...
No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year.
But still.
Good luck getting Texas to play a home and home with UW.
And of course, if I felt like doing research, I could shitpoast a bunch of other top 20 teams with shitty non conference schedules also. But yeah. SC is the norm. -
And I just told you, give SC that same non conference schedule last year, and it would be shit.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You're the idiot that said "No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year."Alexis said:
How many wins did ND and Texas combine for last year? Good schedule for them this year. Great for them.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
USC played Notre Dame, Texas, and Western Michigan.Alexis said:
We (?) Played a Big 10 team, an MWC team, and a local shit team. Fairly standard. But even if you replaced Montana with, say Virginia, and Fresno with Boise (actual downgrade but looks better on paper) the schedule would look better. Do you think the record would be worse?gmo said:someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...
No team plays top level big conference OOC gaymes every year.
But still.
Good luck getting Texas to play a home and home with UW.
And of course, if I felt like doing research, I could shitpoast a bunch of other top 20 teams with shitty non conference schedules also. But yeah. SC is the norm.
Now go fuck yourself -
There's a half brain civil war brewing. The winners vs the losers. The aggressive vs the passive
-
I never left the jungle.phineas said:There's a half brain civil war brewing. The winners vs the losers. The aggressive vs the passive
-
Charlie's in the trees!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I never left the jungle.phineas said:There's a half brain civil war brewing. The winners vs the losers. The aggressive vs the passive
-
ralph@TierbsHsotBoobs pls go -
Because you're stupidTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I never left the jungle.phineas said:There's a half brain civil war brewing. The winners vs the losers. The aggressive vs the passive
