This is a GOOD Washington team
Comments
-
-
Is this the Redskins game thread?
-
Thanks Hondo.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I don't care if you agree with me or not. In fact, I don't expect Doogs like you to agree with me.Gladstone said:
lolTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them.
you stamp your foot and yammer the same shit in every thread on every subforum every hour of every day. UW being good is like the equivalent of pouring water on a CPU with you. at least be funny or something
nor are you self aware enough to see that you're entirely on an island and no one agrees with your myriad spergings anyway
go outside
I'm right. That's all that matters. -
Georgia is us but with a freshmen noodle arm QB and a mediocre head coach, plus it's Georgia.WeakarmCobra said:Your math is wrong. We are roughly better than 92% of the SEC
-
backthepack said:
Georgia is us with a freshmen noodle arm QB and a mediocre head coach.WeakarmCobra said:Your math is wrong. We are roughly better than 92% of the SEC
-
You are a dud, baabs.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I don't care if you agree with me or not. In fact, I don't expect Doogs like you to agree with me.Gladstone said:
lolTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them.
you stamp your foot and yammer the same shit in every thread on every subforum every hour of every day. UW being good is like the equivalent of pouring water on a CPU with you. at least be funny or something
nor are you self aware enough to see that you're entirely on an island and no one agrees with your myriad spergings anyway
go outside
I'm right. That's all that matters. -
What is the biggest win over the past two seasons? Stanford at home? Utah on the road?
Again, this team is on the right path. I just don't agree with comparing it to some of the greatest teams and era's in UW's history based on wins and losses. It doesn't come close to the talent levels of many of those teams.
-
To be fair. That's Race's schtick.pawz said:
Thanks Hondo.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I don't care if you agree with me or not. In fact, I don't expect Doogs like you to agree with me.Gladstone said:
lolTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Doogs hate facts.phineas said:
It's always going to be a good sec and a weak pac12 when the loudest Twitter fans like boobs grab their ankles and let the world know we won't fight if anyone wants to fuck. The media doesn't even need to tell us why we suck, we do the work for themTierbsHsotBoobs said:
That was a good SEC. This is a terrible Pac-12.RaceBannon said:No its not.
No more than losing to Ole Miss
Shit happens
You should actually watch some football
UW could get into the CFP with a 12-1 record, but let's not pretend that shit didn't happen.
Sorry to trigger you with them.
you stamp your foot and yammer the same shit in every thread on every subforum every hour of every day. UW being good is like the equivalent of pouring water on a CPU with you. at least be funny or something
nor are you self aware enough to see that you're entirely on an island and no one agrees with your myriad spergings anyway
go outside
I'm right. That's all that matters. -
Enjoying the hell out of this. 2004-2008 were hell. Every other year since 1991 except for maybe 3-5 were letdowns. I dooged it up in 2009 an 2010 because we weren't doormats anymore and started to get competitive at least, but by 2011 it was clear Sark wasn't going to get to any Rose Bowls.
-
HurtfulTierbsHsotBoobs said:Is this the Redskins game thread?
-
We'll know everything about our team after Stanford.
The rest is just bullshit, Stanford will beat ND, just a matter of we'll handle business or not. -
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story. -
This doesn't seem fun for you.oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story.
-
LaZoris said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story.
-
Definitely abundance.LaZoris said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story.
-
Lol at the Pac11. Doesn't matter who wins the league the losers say they suck
Oregon fans heard it during their run. The league is down
Win the pac12 and see what happens
This is a GOOD Washington team regardless.
As good as most of the past champs and better than some. James won the league at 7-4 for goodness sake -
Agree and disagree. Some of the criticism is warranted. It's been well over a decade since the PAC had a nationally dominant team and a legitimate National Champion. ACC, B1G and SEC have been better at the top and arguably somewhat better top to bottom. That said, there have been, and are, some decent teams in the conference.RaceBannon said:Lol at the Pac11. Doesn't matter who wins the league the losers say they suck
Oregon fans heard it during their run. The league is down
Win the pac12 and see what happens
This is a GOOD Washington team regardless.
As good as most of the past champs and better than some. James won the league at 7-4 for goodness sake
This is a GOOD Washington team. I agree with that. They're not quite Carroll's fighting Trojans or James' vicious Dawgs, but they are GOOD. And they're very well coached. The second half adjustments smack of top level coaching the likes of which the conference hasn't seen since Carroll. The complete disappearance of blowout losses also smacks of top level coaching and discipline. The defense is playing at a championship level and, at times, the offense seems more than capable. The next man up thing has been surprisingly impressive as well. Player development under Peterman is real.
James did win the league at 7-4, true, but that took some help from other teams, and be honest, that team was a hellavu lot better than that record. Throw arrows at that statement, I know it sounds doggish, but it's true. When they pulled their heads out of their collective asses and started playing real football, they were surprisingly good, and they proved it by knocking off the number 4 team in the country in the Rose Bowl in impressive fashion. Oh, and by the way, James, Robinson, Walsh and Donahue were coaches in the league then. It was way stronger and less diluted than today. For goodness sake. -
Fuck you and your 53 seconds.Southerndawg said:LaZoris said:oregonblitzkrieg said:
UW will beat Stanford then Stanford will beat ND....lol. Doog playoff pipe dreams. Stanford is garbage. Like the rest of the PAC 12 including UW. It's a toss up who will win that game. You can't compare yourselves to Georgia, so don't even fucking try it. They beat ND and a bunch of shitty opponents. They're undefeated. You beat a bunch of shitty opponents, and then you lost to a shitty opponent. You have a loss. They don't. End of story.
-
Oregon continues its streak of Hucking The FuskiesTierbsHsotBoobs said: -
I didn't know Montana had a winning record.TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
-
People forget that.RaceBannon said:Lol at the Pac11. Doesn't matter who wins the league the losers say they suck
Oregon fans heard it during their run. The league is down
Win the pac12 and see what happens
This is a GOOD Washington team regardless.
As good as most of the past champs and better than some. James won the league at 7-4 for goodness sake -
Jesus. That's sad.TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
-
Disagree
-
-
TYFYSgmo said:
-
Doog poast.RaceBannon said:The last time UW had back to back one loss seasons? 1959 & 1960
Back to back 10-1 with a Rose Bowl win
91 was sandwiched between a 2 loss and 3 loss season. You have to go back to Gil Dobie.
We've been 12-0 once.
We're not at play off or bust and no one including Bama is at unbeaten or bust
Most champions have a loss.
Winning the Pac matters. And we should expect it in this run.
We're as good as any B1G or Big 8 team. Don't know about the ACC. We're as good as 99% of the SEC
Enjoy it. Anyone here remember the 15 years of shame and defeat? Petersen is building a monster.
That's not being a doog. That's being a fan. Some of you need to learn the difference.
Doog poaster.
