Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is a GOOD Washington team

24567

Comments

  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    2001400ex said:

    gmo said:

    someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...

    The Rutgers game was a much better game when the game was scheduled.
    Rutgers was a replacement. We were originally supposed to play Wisconsin this year but they backed out.

  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732
    The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,501 Swaye's Wigwam

    haie said:

    If UW shits the bed against Stanford, this thread should be pinned forever to save everyone the effort of bumping it.

    UW losing this week would be a much, much bigger failure than ASU.

    Their offense is Utah-bad.
    True. But their defense is better than ASU and Washington has only beaten gimps on the road so far this year.

    Stanford SUCKS as usual, but they are the best opponent Washington will play away from home yet this season. This isn't a guaranteed win.



    It is nice to see Race back to Full Doog though. It's who he has always been at heart.
    Aside from “Horrible Harry” they don’t look great on that side either. Their corners look like dreck.

    They just look like a disciplined team that’s shitty talentwise and hopes you turn it over to them like OSU did. Scrappy little couglets out-muscled them. They were only really in it from a patented Falk pick 6.

    Unlike ASU this is a home game.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    edited November 2017
    outside of the opening defensive drives. I have a hard time not getting a boner watching our defense play.
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    Mad_Son said:

    2001400ex said:

    gmo said:

    someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...

    The Rutgers game was a much better game when the game was scheduled.
    Rutgers was a replacement. We were originally supposed to play Wisconsin this year but they backed out.

    Wasnt montanya the replacement?
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,645 Founders Club

    image

    Still got to win two tough games in California.

    Not gonne lie, I've got this weird 1982 vibe thing going with the Apple Cup. WSU as season killer giving them a reason to live, besides fucking their sisters, for the next decade and a half.
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    phineas said:

    The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.

    If they haven't already. That wazzoo game was a shitshow
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Remember the golden rule of Pac-12 football:

    Everyone sucks.
  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732
    There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.

    But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.
  • GwadGwad Member Posts: 2,855
    Swaye said:

    image

    Still got to win two tough games in California.

    Not gonne lie, I've got this weird 1982 vibe thing going with the Apple Cup. WSU as season killer giving them a reason to live, besides fucking their sisters, for the next decade and a half.
    82 was in Pullman though
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    phineas said:

    There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.

    But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.

    The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.

    This conference is shit until proven otherwise.
  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732

    phineas said:

    There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.

    But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.

    The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.

    This conference is shit until proven otherwise.
    Not our problem.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,326 Founders Club
    phineas said:

    The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.

    Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.

    Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    phineas said:

    phineas said:

    There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.

    But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.

    The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.

    This conference is shit until proven otherwise.
    Not our problem.
    It's *our* problem when we shit the bed against them.

  • phineasphineas Member Posts: 4,732
    edited November 2017

    phineas said:

    The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.

    Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.

    Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
    Stanford is worse than they were last year. Power teams with shitty players arent going to beat Washington. Power teams with top talent like USC or Alabama is the problem.

    Or, teams with a talented quarterback that expect to win. Stanford is none of those. Arizona would be a bigger problem than stanford.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    phineas said:

    phineas said:

    The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.

    Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.

    Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
    Stanford is worse than they were last year. Power teams with shitty players isn't going to be Washington. Power teams with top talent like USC or Alabama is the problem.

    Or, teams with a talented quarterback that expect to win. Stanford is none of those. Arizona would be a bigger problem than stanford.
    ASU doesn't have powerful anything and they beat Washington.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 109,486 Founders Club
    No its not.

    No more than losing to Ole Miss

    Shit happens

    You should actually watch some football

Sign In or Register to comment.