Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is a GOOD Washington team

12467…14

Comments

  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.

    But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Gwad
    Gwad Member Posts: 2,855
    Swaye said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    image

    Still got to win two tough games in California.

    Not gonne lie, I've got this weird 1982 vibe thing going with the Apple Cup. WSU as season killer giving them a reason to live, besides fucking their sisters, for the next decade and a half.
    82 was in Pullman though
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    phineas said:

    There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.

    But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.

    The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.

    This conference is shit until proven otherwise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    phineas said:

    There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.

    But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.

    The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.

    This conference is shit until proven otherwise.
    Not our problem.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,357 Founders Club
    phineas said:

    The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.

    Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.

    Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    phineas said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    phineas said:

    There are a lot of people still shell shocked about the last couple decades of husky football. It's understandable.

    But saying the pac12 sucks is doing a disservice to Washington. Washington is making all of these teams look worse than they are, because Washington is good. If you want a seat at the big boys table, start acting like you belong. Because that's what Petersen doing, and that's what the players are doing.

    The other teams proved how much they suck by being terrible in OOC games. USC is going to *win the South and they got assblasted by Notre Dame. WSU was lucky to beat Boise at home. Stanford and ASU lost to fucking San Diego State. Arizona lost at home to Houston.

    This conference is shit until proven otherwise.
    Not our problem.
    It's *our* problem when we shit the bed against them.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    edited November 2017
    Southerndawg said:

    phineas said:

    The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.

    Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.

    Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
    Stanford is worse than they were last year. Power teams with shitty players arent going to beat Washington. Power teams with top talent like USC or Alabama is the problem.

    Or, teams with a talented quarterback that expect to win. Stanford is none of those. Arizona would be a bigger problem than stanford.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    phineas said:

    Southerndawg said:

    phineas said:

    The beavers ran over Stanford. Their run d is terrible. This game is going to be ugly. Stanford is going to quit like Oregon did.

    Oregon is a shit 2-5 team that got it's shit pushed in hard by WSU, UCLA, Stanford and UW. ASU also got their tip in. Whether they're quitting or not, Oregon just plain sucks.

    Stanford is 5-2 with just one bad loss. They may also be shit since this is a shit conference, but I'm not seeing the quit in them. The Huskies should win, but they should have beaten ASU too and that didn't exactly play out. I hope you're right, but IMO, this is a game the Dawgs should win but could lose.
    Stanford is worse than they were last year. Power teams with shitty players isn't going to be Washington. Power teams with top talent like USC or Alabama is the problem.

    Or, teams with a talented quarterback that expect to win. Stanford is none of those. Arizona would be a bigger problem than stanford.
    ASU doesn't have powerful anything and they beat Washington.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,765 Founders Club
    No its not.

    No more than losing to Ole Miss

    Shit happens

    You should actually watch some football

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter