Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

This is a GOOD Washington team

2456714

Comments

  • gmo
    gmo Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,898 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    gmo said:

    someone please tell me the last time "we" played schedules like this two years in a row...

    In the 80s and 90s we played an 8 game PAC schedule and scheduled a game against another power 6 conference. Now we have 9 conference games. The Rutgers game was a much better game when the game was scheduled. That being said, no team from Montana should ever on our schedule.

    1990:
    Colorado
    Purdue
    San Jose State

    1991:
    Nebraska
    Kansas State
    Toledo

    1992:
    Nebraska
    Wisconsin
    Pacific

    1993:
    Ohio State
    East Carolina
    San Jose State
    Yes, this is my point. I think we should be happy with the direction of this team especially considering our recent history. I also think we shouldn't get too excited and use 1 loss seasons as a barometer for anything, considering the quality of our schedules the past two seasons. This is a good not great team as it is currently constructed. Hope I am wrong but I anticipate during this two year stretch we will be 0-3 after all is said and done vs. elite opponents.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,580 Founders Club
    edited November 2017

    If UW shits the bed against Stanford, this thread should be pinned forever to save everyone the effort of bumping it.

    UW losing this week would be a much, much bigger failure than ASU.

    Their offense is Utah-bad.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,357 Founders Club

    If UW shits the bed against Stanford, this thread should be pinned forever to save everyone the effort of bumping it.

    If the Tempe Dawgs show up, Stanford wins rather easily.