Willie Taggart
Comments
-
Nothing hypothetical about it. Leavitt putting out the dumpster fires on the defense as quickly as he did is pretty impressive. It's just sad he couldn't stop them before they spread to the offense.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We don't deal in hypotheticals hereIPukeOregonGrellow said:
That game is 70-21 ASU without Leavitt.dhdawg said:
OBK was sucking Leavitt's cock Tuesday and mosster was popping off big time after a scrimmage.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I'm too lazy to dig but it seemed like OBK and Mosster were optimistic about Faggart. A ton of Quooks were in Facebook groups.
so yeah, they were -
So the defense played great. The offensive line played great. You have who Mosster proclaims is one of the 2 or 3 best backs in the nation in Freeman and future Heisman candidate Jason Herman... yet you lost to a terrible ASU team.
Yeaaaaaa something isn't adding up. -
Not defending Lyles-Taggart - that was a shit loss on many levels - but am still in LIFPO mode.CuntWaffle said:So the defense played great. The offensive line played great. You have who Mosster proclaims is one of the 2 or 3 best backs in the nation in Freeman and future Heisman candidate Jason Herman... yet you lost to a terrible ASU team.
Yeaaaaaa something isn't adding up.
It's not like Peterman didn't lose his first Pac-12 gayme at home to a mediocre Stanford team or anything. So either Lyles-Taggart gets better or he doesn't. Either way it will be interesting. Maybe he just needs more tim.
-
Tagfart is Peterman QPOTW.AZDuck said:
Not defending Lyles-Taggart - that was a shit loss on many levels - but am still in LIFPO mode.CuntWaffle said:So the defense played great. The offensive line played great. You have who Mosster proclaims is one of the 2 or 3 best backs in the nation in Freeman and future Heisman candidate Jason Herman... yet you lost to a terrible ASU team.
Yeaaaaaa something isn't adding up.
It's not like Peterman didn't lose his first Pac-12 gayme at home to a mediocre Stanford team or anything. So either Lyles-Taggart gets better or he doesn't. Either way it will be interesting. Maybe he just needs more tim. -
don't be an obtuse dumbass.MisterEm said:
Tagfart is Peterman QPOTW.AZDuck said:
Not defending Lyles-Taggart - that was a shit loss on many levels - but am still in LIFPO mode.CuntWaffle said:So the defense played great. The offensive line played great. You have who Mosster proclaims is one of the 2 or 3 best backs in the nation in Freeman and future Heisman candidate Jason Herman... yet you lost to a terrible ASU team.
Yeaaaaaa something isn't adding up.
It's not like Peterman didn't lose his first Pac-12 gayme at home to a mediocre Stanford team or anything. So either Lyles-Taggart gets better or he doesn't. Either way it will be interesting. Maybe he just needs more tim.
Pointing out that Peterman also lost his first conference gayme =/= equating Lyles-Taggart to Peterman. It just means that I'm not ready to anoint him as the second cumming of Kevin Sumlin just yet. -
AZDuck said:
don't be an obtuse dumbass.MisterEm said:
Tagfart is Peterman QPOTW.AZDuck said:
Not defending Lyles-Taggart - that was a shit loss on many levels - but am still in LIFPO mode.CuntWaffle said:So the defense played great. The offensive line played great. You have who Mosster proclaims is one of the 2 or 3 best backs in the nation in Freeman and future Heisman candidate Jason Herman... yet you lost to a terrible ASU team.
Yeaaaaaa something isn't adding up.
It's not like Peterman didn't lose his first Pac-12 gayme at home to a mediocre Stanford team or anything. So either Lyles-Taggart gets better or he doesn't. Either way it will be interesting. Maybe he just needs more tim.
Pointing out that Peterman also lost his first conference gayme =/= equating Lyles-Taggart to Peterman. It just means that I'm not ready to anoint him as the second cumming of Kevin Sumlin just yet.
-
We were told by mosster and obk hat Taggart was taking over a team loaded with talent (at least on offense). Petersen inherited a qb room of cyler miles and wild swedeAZDuck said:
Not defending Lyles-Taggart - that was a shit loss on many levels - but am still in LIFPO mode.CuntWaffle said:So the defense played great. The offensive line played great. You have who Mosster proclaims is one of the 2 or 3 best backs in the nation in Freeman and future Heisman candidate Jason Herman... yet you lost to a terrible ASU team.
Yeaaaaaa something isn't adding up.
It's not like Peterman didn't lose his first Pac-12 gayme at home to a mediocre Stanford team or anything. So either Lyles-Taggart gets better or he doesn't. Either way it will be interesting. Maybe he just needs more tim.
-
Someone has no idea how football works. Continue on though.CuntWaffle said:
Oh "down a man" I remember you saying Oregons 2nd stringers would all start on Pac 12 teams.Mosster47 said:
They weren't at all, they did everything down a man. If they were awful Oregon wouldn't have scored more than 14 points.bananasnblondes said:It should also be pointed out that in spite of all the panty pissing on this site about Crystobal, Lemieux, Throckmorton, etc., Oregon's O Line was fucking awful.
You can't blame the kids for the idiots leading them.
Shit excuse shit poaster.
You don't score 42 points in the first half three times in a row on accident then forget how to play because the band performed.
The second half offensive struggles were because the D added an extra man and we didn't. The same was true for ASU for 45 minutes of game clock.
I have no excuse for that. It has nothing to do with how the O-line played, which was very well, dominant most of the time, but they can't be blamed for an unblocked man in the box. This is Power 5, FBS football, which means even if you have a 1st round running back, which Oregon does, he isn't going to be productive in that scenario. -
In defense of doogs, they were mostly right. Thee score was 70-21 without Wilcox last year.CuntWaffle said:
That's what doogs said about Wilcox when we played Oregon.IPukeOregonGrellow said:
That game is 70-21 ASU without Leavitt.dhdawg said:
OBK was sucking Leavitt's cock Tuesday and mosster was popping off big time after a scrimmage.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I'm too lazy to dig but it seemed like OBK and Mosster were optimistic about Faggart. A ton of Quooks were in Facebook groups.
so yeah, they were -
I agree you can't judge Taggart completely as the 3 year rule applies to every coach at every new situation except if you are a true blue blood then it's probably safe to judge on 2. I will still like to make fun of Taggarts Sark like habits though. Maybe he will be better than Sark or maybe he is another 7-6 clone. Either way LIPO.AZDuck said:
Not defending Lyles-Taggart - that was a shit loss on many levels - but am still in LIFPO mode.CuntWaffle said:So the defense played great. The offensive line played great. You have who Mosster proclaims is one of the 2 or 3 best backs in the nation in Freeman and future Heisman candidate Jason Herman... yet you lost to a terrible ASU team.
Yeaaaaaa something isn't adding up.
It's not like Peterman didn't lose his first Pac-12 gayme at home to a mediocre Stanford team or anything. So either Lyles-Taggart gets better or he doesn't. Either way it will be interesting. Maybe he just needs more tim.
I'm mostly just poking fun at Mossters Swiss cheese logic and back pedaling.
