CuntWaffles useless post scrimmage grades
RBs: B - Hard to grade since O line was shit. But I know Coleman and Gaskin are legit.
WRs/TEs: B+ - Pettis is a God. Sample looked great for a white TE. Random guys were all serviceable.
O Line: F - no excuse. They should have dominated and they sucked.
D Line: B - Yes they ripped off some 10 yard runs but overall they did a good job.
Linebackers: B- - We will be fine when weed smoking Azeem is back. Backups didn't look horrible.
DBs: B+ - Byron Murphy is as good as advertised. Keith Taylor got ripped to the ground on that TD you stupid fucks.
Special teams: A - Pettis the God again. Kicking was surprisingly good.
Overall: C+ - a bunch of work but it wasn't as bad as the game thread would make it out to be.
Should be the best 1-11 team we ever had.
Comments
-
OL was disappointing. I'm not at panic level there. 4 returning starters and they were good last year.
Gaskin needs the ball. However, I don't hate easing him into action to preserve him for the actual games.
If Pettis were to get hurt, we are fucked. We have too many JAG's at WR.
I don't see it with Jordan Miller.
Pass rush is an issue until somebody steps up. -
Pass rush was the only thing about the D that really concerned me. Rutgers didn't throw the ball down the field a ton but still we should have had more pressure on the QB than one bullshit sack at the end of the game.RoadDawg55 said:OL was disappointing. I'm not at panic level there. 4 returning starters and they were good last year.
Gaskin needs the ball. However, I don't hate easing him into action to preserve him for the actual games.
If Pettis were to get hurt, we are fucked. We have too many JAG's at WR.
I don't see it with Jordan Miller.
Pass rush is an issue until somebody steps up. -
I saw Miller with one great coverage play, but I didn't really see him stand out the rest of the way. Granted, it's not exactly like Rutgers was lighting up the field through the air, either. The rest I agree with. Gaskin with 2 carries in a half is tantamount to suicide by bukkake. I was more concerned about the LB play, although I'm assuming Azeem will fix some of that shit.RoadDawg55 said:OL was disappointing. I'm not at panic level there. 4 returning starters and they were good last year.
Gaskin needs the ball. However, I don't hate easing him into action to preserve him for the actual games.
If Pettis were to get hurt, we are fucked. We have too many JAG's at WR.
I don't see it with Jordan Miller.
Pass rush is an issue until somebody steps up. -
Miller didn't stand out but he didn't not stand out? I didn't feel like he got beat a bunch.
I also didn't see much of Rapp tonight but that doesn't mean he's not good. That's football sometimes the plays just don't come to you.
Our secondary was fucking fantastic tonight for the first game post Budda/Sidney/King. Smoke a joint and rellllllaxxxxxxx.... -
Rapp hit a lot of guys and they went down immediately. They also sent him on a blitz at least once.CuntWaffle said:Miller didn't stand out but he didn't not stand out? I didn't feel like he got beat a bunch.
I also didn't see much of Rapp tonight but that doesn't mean he's not good. That's football sometimes the plays just don't come to you.
Our secondary was fucking fantastic tonight for the first game post Budda/Sidney/King. Smoke a joint and rellllllaxxxxxxx.... -
What wasn't to see with Miller, he didn't really get thrown at? An invisible CB is usually a good CB.RoadDawg55 said:OL was disappointing. I'm not at panic level there. 4 returning starters and they were good last year.
Gaskin needs the ball. However, I don't hate easing him into action to preserve him for the actual games.
If Pettis were to get hurt, we are fucked. We have too many JAG's at WR.
I don't see it with Jordan Miller.
Pass rush is an issue until somebody steps up. -
I didn't say he was bad. You just didn't see him stand out because that's how football works. Sometimes the plays just don't happen around you. I think Jordan Miller will be fine.WilburHooksHands said:
Rapp hit a lot of guys and they went down immediately. They also sent him on a blitz at least once.CuntWaffle said:Miller didn't stand out but he didn't not stand out? I didn't feel like he got beat a bunch.
I also didn't see much of Rapp tonight but that doesn't mean he's not good. That's football sometimes the plays just don't come to you.
Our secondary was fucking fantastic tonight for the first game post Budda/Sidney/King. Smoke a joint and rellllllaxxxxxxx.... -
The WRs had 6 receptions tonight ... Pettis had 3 of those
Pettis = A
Everybody else = F
Fuck some you are fucktarded -
So you don't blame browning at all?Tequilla said:The WRs had 6 receptions tonight ... Pettis had 3 of those
Pettis = A
Everybody else = F
Fuck some you are fucktarded -
What would anyone possibly have to blame on Jakey?CuntWaffle said:
So you don't blame browning at all?Tequilla said:The WRs had 6 receptions tonight ... Pettis had 3 of those
Pettis = A
Everybody else = F
Fuck some you are fucktarded -
Saw too many missed tackles tonight, way more than in a typical game last year.
-
Browning largely sucked ...CuntWaffle said:
So you don't blame browning at all?Tequilla said:The WRs had 6 receptions tonight ... Pettis had 3 of those
Pettis = A
Everybody else = F
Fuck some you are fucktarded
But outside Pettis the WRs didn't do anything to think that they are anything more than JAGs right now -
I said they were "serviceable"Tequilla said:
Browning largely sucked ...CuntWaffle said:
So you don't blame browning at all?Tequilla said:The WRs had 6 receptions tonight ... Pettis had 3 of those
Pettis = A
Everybody else = F
Fuck some you are fucktarded
But outside Pettis the WRs didn't do anything to think that they are anything more than JAGs right now -
Miller pressed a lot and didn't get beat. Is that good?
-
Noticed this watching last night. Pettis is a big dick bad ass. The rest all seem meh.RoadDawg55 said:OL was disappointing. I'm not at panic level there. 4 returning starters and they were good last year.
Gaskin needs the ball. However, I don't hate easing him into action to preserve him for the actual games.
If Pettis were to get hurt, we are fucked. We have too many JAG's at WR.
I don't see it with Jordan Miller.
Pass rush is an issue until somebody steps up. -
Our backup LBs are hot garbage. None of the LBs out there last night look like P12 LBs, much less SEC LBs. Burr kiven belongs on a team like Montana.
Pettis saved the 8-4 season to come. -
I think I'm biased and just have a feeling Miller sucks. Murphy is an obvious stud, Bryant is good. The three true freshmen are playing for a reason though.CuntWaffle said:Miller didn't stand out but he didn't not stand out? I didn't feel like he got beat a bunch.
I also didn't see much of Rapp tonight but that doesn't mean he's not good. That's football sometimes the plays just don't come to you.
Our secondary was fucking fantastic tonight for the first game post Budda/Sidney/King. Smoke a joint and rellllllaxxxxxxx.... -
Rewatched parts of the gayme. Jesus. OL, Smiff and Brownsocks should all be napalmed. WR's will be okay if Brownsocks ever stops sucking.
-
I'm an admitted BBK fan, but because he is an undersized white guy, you guys blow his bad plays out of proportion.Dawgs4ever said:Our backup LBs are hot garbage. None of the LBs out there last night look like P12 LBs, much less SEC LBs. Burr kiven belongs on a team like Montana.
Pettis saved the 8-4 season to come.
He's active. He does make plays. You aren't wrong because he would have a hard time sniffing the field at Alabama or LSU, but you guys exaggerate and pretend like he sucks. He's a good football player, but he needs to play a specific role. With Victor and Beavers out, he gets exposed. -
My brother repeatedly said, man Rapp is bringing the wood. I agreed.CuntWaffle said:
I didn't say he was bad. You just didn't see him stand out because that's how football works. Sometimes the plays just don't happen around you. I think Jordan Miller will be fine.WilburHooksHands said:
Rapp hit a lot of guys and they went down immediately. They also sent him on a blitz at least once.CuntWaffle said:Miller didn't stand out but he didn't not stand out? I didn't feel like he got beat a bunch.
I also didn't see much of Rapp tonight but that doesn't mean he's not good. That's football sometimes the plays just don't come to you.
Our secondary was fucking fantastic tonight for the first game post Budda/Sidney/King. Smoke a joint and rellllllaxxxxxxx.... -
#rappculturerustysavage said:
My brother repeatedly said, man Rapp is bringing the wood. I agreed.CuntWaffle said:
I didn't say he was bad. You just didn't see him stand out because that's how football works. Sometimes the plays just don't happen around you. I think Jordan Miller will be fine.WilburHooksHands said:
Rapp hit a lot of guys and they went down immediately. They also sent him on a blitz at least once.CuntWaffle said:Miller didn't stand out but he didn't not stand out? I didn't feel like he got beat a bunch.
I also didn't see much of Rapp tonight but that doesn't mean he's not good. That's football sometimes the plays just don't come to you.
Our secondary was fucking fantastic tonight for the first game post Budda/Sidney/King. Smoke a joint and rellllllaxxxxxxx.... -
I'd agree with you if BBK could tackle worth a shit. But, he can't. So, Disagree and do not understand how you can call him a "good" football player, versus mediocre or below. Just being around the play, like he was all night, is not enough. He needs to make plays, and he missed or blew more plays last night than he made. Numerous running plays where he had hands on a guy after a 1 yard gain, but got dragged 6 yards downfield come to mind.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm an admitted BBK fan, but because he is an undersized white guy, you guys blow his bad plays out of proportion.Dawgs4ever said:Our backup LBs are hot garbage. None of the LBs out there last night look like P12 LBs, much less SEC LBs. Burr kiven belongs on a team like Montana.
Pettis saved the 8-4 season to come.
He's active. He does make plays. You aren't wrong because he would have a hard time sniffing the field at Alabama or LSU, but you guys exaggerate and pretend like he sucks. He's a good football player, but he needs to play a specific role. With Victor and Beavers out, he gets exposed.
This is where football IQ really counts. BBK needs to realize his strengths and weaknesses, then play to his strengths. He has good speed, which could make him disruptive and a good pass defender, but he's not big or strong enough to move guards around or lay the lumber on RBs coming around the corner. Grab on, wrap up, slow the RBs down and wait for the help if you can't make the tackle yourself. And work on your fucking tackling, Fabio! Goddamn! -
Rutgers may still suck, but they actually had a great game plan against UW. Victor is out, attack the middle of the d that is using a tiny MIL. Eat up clock and and concentrate on just getting first downs. Try to win a 17-10 type of game. Our athletes thwarted that with the turnovers and special teams.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm an admitted BBK fan, but because he is an undersized white guy, you guys blow his bad plays out of proportion.Dawgs4ever said:Our backup LBs are hot garbage. None of the LBs out there last night look like P12 LBs, much less SEC LBs. Burr kiven belongs on a team like Montana.
Pettis saved the 8-4 season to come.
He's active. He does make plays. You aren't wrong because he would have a hard time sniffing the field at Alabama or LSU, but you guys exaggerate and pretend like he sucks. He's a good football player, but he needs to play a specific role. With Victor and Beavers out, he gets exposed.
On d, blitz the shit out of browning and force him to make mistakes. Every team in conference will probabaly try this so Sample and Gaskin on dump offs is going to be pivotal. They need to get quick strikes to McClutch going.
Time to Ride the Lightning Huff you goofy looking mother fucker. -
Considering how bad the Asian 12 plays defense the Rutgers front may be among the best we play
-
That was a GOOD Rutgers team
-
@Haie writes: They need to get quick strikes to McClutch going.
Question is why we literally have no quick strike plays in our offense, and prefer time-consuming, dangerous lobs near the goal line, instead. Fuck! -
Browning's shit ball probabaly makes those kind of routes impossible without serious threat of getting picked.TurdBuffer said:@Haie writes: They need to get quick strikes to McClutch going.
Question is why we literally have no quick strike plays in our offense, and prefer time-consuming, dangerous lobs near the goal line, instead. Fuck! -
I should just stop axing these kinds of questions. The answers only make me feel worse.haie said:
Browning's shit ball probabaly makes those kind of routes impossible without serious threat of getting picked.TurdBuffer said:@Haie writes: They need to get quick strikes to McClutch going.
Question is why we literally have no quick strike plays in our offense, and prefer time-consuming, dangerous lobs near the goal line, instead. Fuck! -
This is so sad but true. Stanford is the only one I can think of that MIGHT be as good or better and that's just based off of their past teams, I really have no idea. Utah I guess could be too as they usually always have some big fucking Polys.RaceBannon said:Considering how bad the Asian 12 plays defense the Rutgers front may be among the best we play
USC for sure will be better but I'm hoping they shit their pants during the season so we don't have to play them in the P12 title. -
CuntWaffle said:
This is so sad but true. Stanford is the only one I can think of that MIGHT be as good or better and that's just based off of their past teams, I really have no idea. Utah I guess could be too as they usually always have some big fucking Polys.RaceBannon said:Considering how bad the Asian 12 plays defense the Rutgers front may be among the best we play
USC for sure will be better but I'm hoping they shit their pants during the season so the cuog doesnt have to play them in the P12 title.
