Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Manuel Allen, 2018 WR, Corona (Centennial), CA (OFFERED)
Comments
-
Is he still rated higher than Osborne on scout? What a shit show.
-
I'm a fan of using birdgang as often as possible, so I'm ok with this.
-
-
I wonder if Coach Pete still likes this kid's stars.
-
Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.Tequilla said:
What's your standards?Nurple said:
You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.Tequilla said:
You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.Nurple said:We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:
1920s: 1
1930s: 1
1940s: 0
1950s: 1
1960s: 2
1970s: 1
1980s: 2
1990s: 4
2000s: 1
2010s: 1
Total: 14
Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.
That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:
USC: 40
UCLA: 19 -
Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.Swaye said:
Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.Tequilla said:
What's your standards?Nurple said:
You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.Tequilla said:
You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.Nurple said:We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:
1920s: 1
1930s: 1
1940s: 0
1950s: 1
1960s: 2
1970s: 1
1980s: 2
1990s: 4
2000s: 1
2010s: 1
Total: 14
Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.
That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:
USC: 40
UCLA: 19 -
Coogs didn't ruin 84, I thought SC didtheknowledge said:
Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.Swaye said:
Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.Tequilla said:
What's your standards?Nurple said:
You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.Tequilla said:
You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.Nurple said:We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:
1920s: 1
1930s: 1
1940s: 0
1950s: 1
1960s: 2
1970s: 1
1980s: 2
1990s: 4
2000s: 1
2010s: 1
Total: 14
Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.
That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:
USC: 40
UCLA: 19 -
I know the situation right now seems odd, but to what do you owe your optimism?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Chase Williams won't be a Dawg. Cook it.priapism said:UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...
Also: Tre'Shaun needs to happen and will. -
That poast was in April. Ups and downs, etcGladstone said:
I know the situation right seems odd, but to what do you owe your optimism?Dennis_DeYoung said:
Chase Williams won't be a Dawg. Cook it.priapism said:UW still needs to get Chase Williams. He'd be a great punt/kick returner. Maybe even CB, if not WR. Him and Harrison have the best hips in the west...
Also: Tre'Shaun needs to happen and will. -
Coogs got us in 81 and 82dnc said:
Coogs didn't ruin 84, I thought SC didtheknowledge said:
Coogs ruined two more in the 80's. One of those years we went to the Orange Bowl and one I think we? ended in an Aloha loss to Pedo St. in Hawaii. That would have been 8-20 or almost half the time for a couple decades. Not too shabby. A long walk and some perspective on your perspective may be wise.Swaye said:
Perspective posts are depressing. In the 80's and 90's, our best football ever, we won the conference 6 times. In twenty fucking years. Wow.Tequilla said:
What's your standards?Nurple said:
You're right but until we win at high level of constantly conference championship or better we are gonna hardcorehusky all over this shit .Do you really think the blue bloods do it the way they're supposed to do it.Tequilla said:
You don't have to do that to be competing at a high level ... we do it the way you're supposed to ... our problem is that we don't get enough of our A targets as I'd like.Nurple said:We can bitch all we want but blue bloods gonna blue blood. It's fucked up for those kids but when your basically corporate football your infallible.One day I hope UW can do this but I maybe wishful thinking.
Starting in the 1920's, the number of conference championships that we've either won outright or shared the title for by decade as follows:
1920s: 1
1930s: 1
1940s: 0
1950s: 1
1960s: 2
1970s: 1
1980s: 2
1990s: 4
2000s: 1
2010s: 1
Total: 14
Over that time period, we finished 2nd in the conference 18 different times.
That's not saying that we can't win at a consistently high level, but there's reason to be tempered about our success and knowing that we're always going to be going uphill against the LA schools. Just as a point of reference, over this time period, the number of conference/division titles by the LA schools:
USC: 40
UCLA: 19
https://youtu.be/pLvzvEsjv80
