5 reasons Huskies won’t repeat as Pac-12 champs

Comments

• YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 35,383

  July 2017

  So we did not win the conference in 2000 according to this fucktard?

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,894

  July 2017

  Christ!

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,496

  July 2017 edited July 2017

  How will we! replaced Travis Feeney John Ross???!!??!!!111

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Baseman Member Posts: 12,366

  July 2017

  USC (NT)

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PA_Heisman Member Posts: 26

  July 2017

  At least we've got Tyler Rapp coming back this year.

  12 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• BleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 11,496

  July 2017

  I thought it was pronounced Warshington? Now "we" are the Hurskies?

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Gladstone Member Posts: 16,419

  July 2017

  Kill everyone.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• pawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,892

  July 2017

  #2 - Off Season Natty

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• whlinder Member Posts: 4,760

  July 2017

  Sounds like it's hard

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,280

  July 2017

  Thanks Taft!

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,457

  July 2017

  Hurskies??
  
  
  

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• dnc Member Posts: 56,697

  July 2017

  HuskyJW said:

  Hurskies??
  
  
  

  WOORF!

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885

  July 2017

  YellowSnow said:

  So we did not win the conference in 2000 according to this fucktard?

  #cochamp

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,457

  July 2017

  salemcoog said:

  YellowSnow said:

  So we did not win the conference in 2000 according to this fucktard?

  #cochamp

  Tri-Champ
  
  http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/conferences/pac-10/2000.html
  
  

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,800

  July 2017

  Oregon is going to be looking for blood.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

  July 2017

  Experts have no idea how fucking good our oline will be. (Dline too). I want USC in pac champ game . Adams and Co are going to fucking PUMMEL usc into oblivion. Darnold is going to run for his life. Cant wait.
  
  Phil Steele just anointed USC the pac12 champ already. Dumbshit claimed USC and Stanford to have best oline's in conference. Steele is the best in biz, he's just painfully ignorant in this case.
  
  Petersen is rolling out the best oline in the cuntry. 250+ on ground. Fill in blank on Jake's proficiency thru air...add 50-100 yds. And that with a ground-oriented offense. Steele is mistaken.
  
  Now Stanford will need to lose 2 games as UW will lose 1,?likely in Palo Alto. Maybe ASU on road, or Oregon at home. Aint getting thru conference unscathed. Were going to need help along the way. But USC, if we get there, is in deep shit

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• BearsWiin Member Posts: 5,033

  July 2017

  You'll lose to fucking Cal

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,496

  July 2017

  https://twitter.com/jmksea/status/884500528658432008

  
  

  https://twitter.com/HereGoJayAgain/status/884503599828656128

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,633

  July 2017

  BearsWiin said:

  You'll lose to fucking Cal

  In my estimation you have rated Cal's chances too high

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

  July 2017

  Fuck that... WASHINGTON is about to rattle off 9 Natties in row with an average National Title game score of 87-6.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter