Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Early Lines

2»

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,141
    Swaye said:

    I thought this thread was about doing blow in the morning.

    Me too!
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    LOL at being a road dog to a Keller Cryst or Ryan Burns led Stanford team

    We will beat Oregon by 2 TDs

    They've been so consistent for so long. It makes sense. Throw in a short week + quasi road game...
    QB is the most important position on the field (enough said about that) and their QBs best skills are handing the ball off ...

    We have too many weapons offensive to think that you are going to win a 17-13 game ... you basically need to be Alabama caliber or catch us on a massive off day ...

    Last year we had a similar situation with Stanford at home and crushed them ... not concerned
    You guys are getting really cocky. As Alabama demonstrated rather easily, you don't need to be Alabama to beat UW. They beat you sleepwalking, with little to no effort, on an off day for them. Roll Tide.
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    LOL at being a road dog to a Keller Cryst or Ryan Burns led Stanford team

    We will beat Oregon by 2 TDs

    They've been so consistent for so long. It makes sense. Throw in a short week + quasi road game...
    QB is the most important position on the field (enough said about that) and their QBs best skills are handing the ball off ...

    We have too many weapons offensive to think that you are going to win a 17-13 game ... you basically need to be Alabama caliber or catch us on a massive off day ...

    Last year we had a similar situation with Stanford at home and crushed them ... not concerned
    You guys are getting really cocky. As Alabama demonstrated rather easily, you don't need to be Alabama to beat UW. They beat you sleepwalking, with little to no effort, on an off day for them. Roll Tide.
    Dude, Doogs have always been arrogant. We just have a good team now.

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    LOL at being a road dog to a Keller Cryst or Ryan Burns led Stanford team

    We will beat Oregon by 2 TDs

    They've been so consistent for so long. It makes sense. Throw in a short week + quasi road game...
    QB is the most important position on the field (enough said about that) and their QBs best skills are handing the ball off ...

    We have too many weapons offensive to think that you are going to win a 17-13 game ... you basically need to be Alabama caliber or catch us on a massive off day ...

    Last year we had a similar situation with Stanford at home and crushed them ... not concerned
    You guys are getting really cocky. As Alabama demonstrated rather easily, you don't need to be Alabama to beat UW. They beat you sleepwalking, with little to no effort, on an off day for them. Roll Tide.
    Dude, Doogs have always been arrogant. We just have a good team now.
    Speak for yourself. I'm Nebraska classy.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,141

    Tequilla said:

    Gladstone said:

    Tequilla said:

    LOL at being a road dog to a Keller Cryst or Ryan Burns led Stanford team

    We will beat Oregon by 2 TDs

    They've been so consistent for so long. It makes sense. Throw in a short week + quasi road game...
    QB is the most important position on the field (enough said about that) and their QBs best skills are handing the ball off ...

    We have too many weapons offensive to think that you are going to win a 17-13 game ... you basically need to be Alabama caliber or catch us on a massive off day ...

    Last year we had a similar situation with Stanford at home and crushed them ... not concerned
    You guys are getting really cocky. As Alabama demonstrated rather easily, you don't need to be Alabama to beat UW. They beat you sleepwalking, with little to no effort, on an off day for them. Roll Tide.
    That's not actually true. Our defense gave their retard offense run by a retard QB and a retard nose-picking offensive coordinator a hard time. If creepycoug is calling plays for Nick that night, they hang 50 on us.

    Our offense blew chunks

    A loss is a loss though so fuck off
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    Tequilla said:

    Way to bury the lead guys

    You can get UCLA and 14.5 points against their bitches from Worshington

    That is the iron clad lock of the year

    Probably as scary of a game as any that we have on the schedule
    Other than the road game at Stanford where we are favored by less than a FG (taking into account the lack of QB), sure.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,141
    haie said:

    el
    oh
    el.
    I'm not scared of fucking Mora. I'll be celebrating with him on the field when we stomp the fighting Ballsacks

    YVBE

    Just don't tell Race.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Gladstone said:

    image

    Your best poast ever. You should retire now. You won't be able to top it.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,141

    haie said:

    el
    oh
    el.
    I'm not scared of fucking Mora. I'll be celebrating with him on the field when we stomp the fighting Ballsacks

    YVBE

    Just don't tell Race.
    Hey look, at least if I flame out, I make it memorable. Most of the time I kind of enjoy the diversion of this place. I've got nothing against Derek or the crew here, but I think the internet isn't going to reward even hideously high numbers of hits with $$$ for maintaining some culture. As far as donation, no, mostly because of one or two posts. I mean, somebody posts a picture of guy falling out of a skyscraper on 911 and it gets a dozen likes. I'm actually not an asshole. I'm not personally going to fund a place for that. THere's limits. Do what you please -- but advertisers aren't paying for that and neither am I. Not a knock on Derek, again.

    This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.

    I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.

    If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.

    There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA, which is coached by a guy you blow on a regular basis, than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.

    If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.