Conservative wet dream abandoned
Comments
-
In 94 we had two parties. I agree in principle but the GOP Congress needs to be aborted n a back alley with a hanger regardless of who is in the white house. Not that the dems deserve any betterTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I prefer the Democratic President + Republican Congress arrangement too.RaceBannon said:Cool story. Spending was lowest with a GOP congress under Clinton. We knew that.
One party rule for either side is horrible. -
Not when you put revenues in context with the size of the economy. But facts don't matter to you.RaceBannon said:Revenues rose substantially under Reagan but I understand that this is akin to a religious experience to the left to deny that.
Keep the faith and ignore the spending -
Shut the fuck up2001400ex said:
Not when you put revenues in context with the size of the economy. But facts don't matter to you.RaceBannon said:Revenues rose substantially under Reagan but I understand that this is akin to a religious experience to the left to deny that.
Keep the faith and ignore the spending -
I always support classy coat hanger abortions of Congresscritters (note: this is not a call for genocide)RaceBannon said:
In 94 we had two parties. I agree in principle but the GOP Congress needs to be aborted n a back alley with a hanger regardless of who is in the white house. Not that the dems deserve any betterTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I prefer the Democratic President + Republican Congress arrangement too.RaceBannon said:Cool story. Spending was lowest with a GOP congress under Clinton. We knew that.
One party rule for either side is horrible. -
You clearly don't like facts. I'll wait for you to pay Derek $100.RaceBannon said:
Shut the fuck up2001400ex said:
Not when you put revenues in context with the size of the economy. But facts don't matter to you.RaceBannon said:Revenues rose substantially under Reagan but I understand that this is akin to a religious experience to the left to deny that.
Keep the faith and ignore the spending -
I want you here as a living breathing example of abject stupidity2001400ex said:
You clearly don't like facts. I'll wait for you to pay Derek $100.RaceBannon said:
Shut the fuck up2001400ex said:
Not when you put revenues in context with the size of the economy. But facts don't matter to you.RaceBannon said:Revenues rose substantially under Reagan but I understand that this is akin to a religious experience to the left to deny that.
Keep the faith and ignore the spending -
Ironic.RaceBannon said:
I want you here as a living breathing example of abject stupidity2001400ex said:
You clearly don't like facts. I'll wait for you to pay Derek $100.RaceBannon said:
Shut the fuck up2001400ex said:
Not when you put revenues in context with the size of the economy. But facts don't matter to you.RaceBannon said:Revenues rose substantially under Reagan but I understand that this is akin to a religious experience to the left to deny that.
Keep the faith and ignore the spending -
Agree. Reagan's deficits, at least, had some ROI. And we borrowed that money in the 1980's primarily from ourselves and not the land of Gina. In my view, once we got the books balanced in the late 90's, we should have done everything possible to keep it that way. Bush '43 will forever have my wrath for fucking up the national checking account and setting a bad precedents.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
At least Reagan's rampant deficit spending helped the economy. It was worth it IMO.RaceBannon said:Revenues rose substantially under Reagan but I understand that this is akin to a religious experience to the left to deny that.
Keep the faith and ignore the spending
As for spending increases....
-
There's a sweet spot on tax rates for top brackets. Reagan was right to bring it down from 70% or whatever the hell it was at the time. But doubt there's much economic stimulus going from, say, 39% down to 29%.RaceBannon said:Revenues rose substantially under Reagan but I understand that this is akin to a religious experience to the left to deny that.
Keep the faith and ignore the spending -
I gotta tell you, that sounds a lot like genocide to me. And I know genocide.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I always support classy coat hanger abortions of Congresscritters (note: this is not a call for genocide)RaceBannon said:
In 94 we had two parties. I agree in principle but the GOP Congress needs to be aborted n a back alley with a hanger regardless of who is in the white house. Not that the dems deserve any betterTierbsHsotBoobs said:
I prefer the Democratic President + Republican Congress arrangement too.RaceBannon said:Cool story. Spending was lowest with a GOP congress under Clinton. We knew that.
One party rule for either side is horrible.
