Scott Woodward publicly says Sumlin has to win this year


Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning.
Comments
-
*Poolboy
-
Politicians gonna politician.
-
Black Sark gonna Black Sark
-
Nobody gets tough in Year 6 like Scott Woodward.
-
Very courageous of him to put an unpopular black coach's balls on the line to a fan base that are like 40% Nazis.
-
Not only that but the real 12s actually care about football results. Why rock the boat in Seattle when the fanbase is so fucking passive?Dennis_DeYoung said:Very courageous of him to put an unpopular black coach's balls on the line to a fan base that are like 40% Nazis.
-
Yeah exactly. Gotta know your audience.EwaDawg said:
Not only that but the real 12s actually care about football results. Why rock the boat in Seattle when the fanbase is so fucking passive?Dennis_DeYoung said:Very courageous of him to put an unpopular black coach's balls on the line to a fan base that are like 40% Nazis.
-
Thanks Taft!DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning. -
Sark?PurpleBaze said:*Poolboy
-
If we're bashing Nazis I'm fucking out.Dennis_DeYoung said:Very courageous of him to put an unpopular black coach's balls on the line to a fan base that are like 40% Nazis.
-
Winning became important for Woodward the minute his own contract was on the line
-
Can't wait for him to boot Sumlin's ass out of the building in week 7 so we can call bullshit again on how he doesn't like to "orphan football programs".
-
It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder. -
But you're not bitter or anything ...DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning.
-
Sumlin has had a lot of leeway down there with the vast majority of the fan base willing to give him time to get things done ... I've had more than a few of my Aggie friends give me shit for calling Sumlin "Black Sark" because they didn't feel it was warranted ...Dennis_DeYoung said:Very courageous of him to put an unpopular black coach's balls on the line to a fan base that are like 40% Nazis.
Some of those same Aggies started changing their tune back end of last year and are in a similar position as UW was going into 2013 -
Woodward is doing the bidding of what the big money is telling him behind closed doors ...RoadDawg55 said:It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder.
There's an 81% chance that Sumlin is done (particularly if they lose at UCLA in Game 1) ...
It should be quite obvious by now that having the right coach is far more important than a single recruiting class ... if you have the right coach the recruiting follows -
?>4-4>4-4>3-5>4-4?RoadDawg55 said:It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder.
Why every coach in the Sec Best other than Freeze wasn't fired this off season I will never understand.
Records against Saban:
Mullen: 0-8
Bielema: 0-4
Sumlin: 1-4
Malzahn: 1-3 (due to kick-6)
Miles: 3-7 (RIP) -
Once again you infer what I didn't imply.Tequilla said:
But you're not bitter or anything ...DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning. -
*chinfer
-
C'mon dude.Tequilla said:
Woodward is doing the bidding of what the big money is telling him behind closed doors ...RoadDawg55 said:It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder.
There's an 81% chance that Sumlin is done (particularly if they lose at UCLA in Game 1) ...
It should be quite obvious by now that having the right coach is far more important than a single recruiting class ... if you have the right coach the recruiting follows -
So you are saying that you like Woodward?DerekJohnson said:
Once again you infer what I didn't imply.Tequilla said:
But you're not bitter or anything ...DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning.
Are you also saying that you harbor no ill feelings to the AD for their past actions?
Why would I ever infer this from you unless you have 1) publicly said as much in the past, 2) stated before last season that you couldn't get excited for the 2016 UW football season, and 3) have no problem throwing digs in the direction of anybody associated with the AD past or present.
The use of "motherfucker" gives your feelings away -
Enough.
-
Let's see where it goes.Gladstone said:Enough.
-
This is one if those weekly threads where @Tequilla gives out and receives all the downvotes
and yet he keeps on digging -
Disagree. Podcasting: OK. Shit Poaster U RTequilla said:
Woodward is doing the bidding of what the big money is telling him behind closed doors ...RoadDawg55 said:It's not exactly a secret that Sumlin has to win. He's gone 8-5 the past three years.
That said, this is a Woodward politician move that does the program no good. It builds up possible goodwill with a disgruntled fan base. It's entirely self serving.
It can't help recruiting and it puts more pressure (even though they are already aware) on the players and coaches. It gives the media free reign to push the issue even harder.
There's an 81% chance that Sumlin is done (particularly if they lose at UCLA in Game 1) ...
It should be quite obvious by now that having the right coach is far more important than a single recruiting class ... if you have the right coach the recruiting follows -
"LIPO" if you will.RoadDawg55 said:
Let's see where it goes.Gladstone said:Enough.
-
What about the use of words like "neurotic" and "fixation"? Do those give my feelings away, Dr Freud?Tequilla said:
So you are saying that you like Woodward?DerekJohnson said:
Once again you infer what I didn't imply.Tequilla said:
But you're not bitter or anything ...DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning.
Are you also saying that you harbor no ill feelings to the AD for their past actions?
Why would I ever infer this from you unless you have 1) publicly said as much in the past, 2) stated before last season that you couldn't get excited for the 2016 UW football season, and 3) have no problem throwing digs in the direction of anybody associated with the AD past or present.
The use of "motherfucker" gives your feelings away
-
Those words make me think we should cyber.DerekJohnson said:
What about the use of words like "neurotic" and "fixation"? Do those give my feelings away, Dr Freud?Tequilla said:
So you are saying that you like Woodward?DerekJohnson said:
Once again you infer what I didn't imply.Tequilla said:
But you're not bitter or anything ...DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning.
Are you also saying that you harbor no ill feelings to the AD for their past actions?
Why would I ever infer this from you unless you have 1) publicly said as much in the past, 2) stated before last season that you couldn't get excited for the 2016 UW football season, and 3) have no problem throwing digs in the direction of anybody associated with the AD past or present.
The use of "motherfucker" gives your feelings away -
Are you speaking for RoadDawg here?DerekJohnson said:
What about the use of words like "neurotic" and "fixation"? Do those give my feelings away, Dr Freud?Tequilla said:
So you are saying that you like Woodward?DerekJohnson said:
Once again you infer what I didn't imply.Tequilla said:
But you're not bitter or anything ...DerekJohnson said:Funny how he never would say that for Sark.
Funny how the motherfucker told me how the SEC placed too much emphasis on winning.
Are you also saying that you harbor no ill feelings to the AD for their past actions?
Why would I ever infer this from you unless you have 1) publicly said as much in the past, 2) stated before last season that you couldn't get excited for the 2016 UW football season, and 3) have no problem throwing digs in the direction of anybody associated with the AD past or present.
The use of "motherfucker" gives your feelings away -
Black Sark is ready to fuckig fight on!