What is the right amount of Basic Income?
Comments
-
Sounds like the bestest afterschool Special ever!!!GrundleStiltzkin said:
Today, boobs finds a conscience to go long with his objector.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Can we do the same with the military?Sledog said:There's an easy way to make this work. Set the minimum income at whatever they want. Then simply mark your tax return to give the required percentage of your own income to fund the plan. Those opposing handouts wont have to pay and all those nice people wanting to give away money can easily do so. Program goes in the shitter because those wanting it won't pay.
Problem solved. End of discussion.
Asking for a friend. -
The Palm Pilot of the late 90's had a chuckle.allpurpleallgold said:Guys, don't worry, technology won't take over your job. We don't even have flying cars yet. I mean we all carry around fucking computers in our pockets but technology is moving at a snails pace.
-
My Kyocera 7135 kicked ass (RIP,TS)salemcoog said:
The Palm Pilot of the late 90's had a chuckle.allpurpleallgold said:Guys, don't worry, technology won't take over your job. We don't even have flying cars yet. I mean we all carry around fucking computers in our pockets but technology is moving at a snails pace.
-
Let's just give everyone a trillion dollars! Then we'd all be rich!
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I read war and assumed @Dardanus was the one being appropriated.Swaye said:
Stop appropriating my culture.Pitchfork51 said:
Idle poverty is our war cry on HH.YellowSnow said:Charles Murray, a prominent conservative political scientist, who made news of late as being the speaker the snowflakes rioted against at Middlebury, thinks it should be around $10,000 a year deposited into a certifiable bank account (Healthcare would be separate deal). No taxes on your first $30,000 (including the universal basic income) so as to remove dis-incentive from going out and getting a low paying job. Logic is that having $30,000 a year will be better for most, than $10,000 even if you have to earn it by showing up at a job. Right now too many in our society are choosing idle poverty (e.g., disability payments) over working poverty, because there's not much difference financially.
Good assumption, but I've been doing just fine lately: -
-
Productivity growth in the US has been pretty much flat since the 1970salemcoog said:
THE ROBOTS ARE COMING!!!!!UWhuskytskeet said:What is the right's solution for 95% of current jobs being automated?
THE ROBOTS ARE COMING!!!!
Fuck I hate stupid liberals.
There will still be jobs post the robot menace. Challenge is there will be less of them where by people of average ability can still earn a really good living. Consider, right now there about 1.5 million households in the US where the primary breadwinner drives a truck for a living - what's that going to look like in 20 or 30 years? Yes, technological change has always been a constant in this country and past creative destruction has yielded new and better jobs, but this doesn't mean we can always count on this in the future.salemcoog said:
THE ROBOTS ARE COMING!!!!!UWhuskytskeet said:What is the right's solution for 95% of current jobs being automated?
THE ROBOTS ARE COMING!!!!
Fuck I hate stupid liberals. -
-
-
-
-
-
Dardanus reigned for sixty four or sixty five years and was succeeded by his son Erichthonius.Dardanus said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
I read war and assumed @Dardanus was the one being appropriated.Swaye said:
Stop appropriating my culture.Pitchfork51 said:
Idle poverty is our war cry on HH.YellowSnow said:Charles Murray, a prominent conservative political scientist, who made news of late as being the speaker the snowflakes rioted against at Middlebury, thinks it should be around $10,000 a year deposited into a certifiable bank account (Healthcare would be separate deal). No taxes on your first $30,000 (including the universal basic income) so as to remove dis-incentive from going out and getting a low paying job. Logic is that having $30,000 a year will be better for most, than $10,000 even if you have to earn it by showing up at a job. Right now too many in our society are choosing idle poverty (e.g., disability payments) over working poverty, because there's not much difference financially.
Good assumption, but I've been doing just fine lately:
@ErichthoniusDawg is still available. -
FYI- there will still be drivers in trucks for the most part for a long, long time. ADAS level 5 is a long way off.YellowSnow said:
Productivity growth in the US has been pretty much flat since the 1970salemcoog said:
THE ROBOTS ARE COMING!!!!!UWhuskytskeet said:What is the right's solution for 95% of current jobs being automated?
THE ROBOTS ARE COMING!!!!
Fuck I hate stupid liberals.
There will still be jobs post the robot menace. Challenge is there will be less of them where by people of average ability can still earn a really good living. Consider, right now there about 1.5 million households in the US where the primary breadwinner drives a truck for a living - what's that going to look like in 20 or 30 years? Yes, technological change has always been a constant in this country and past creative destruction has yielded new and better jobs, but this doesn't mean we can always count on this in the future.salemcoog said:
THE ROBOTS ARE COMING!!!!!UWhuskytskeet said:What is the right's solution for 95% of current jobs being automated?
THE ROBOTS ARE COMING!!!!
Fuck I hate stupid liberals. -
You were there?RaceBannon said: -
Actually was.BennyBeaver said:
You were there?RaceBannon said: