Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Off season where you Dooged harder than 2017?

YellowSnow
YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club
edited April 2017 in Hardcore Husky Board
The term (Doog) hadn't been coined yet for some of these but you get the gist

Off season where you Dooged harder than 2017? 39 votes

None - 2017 is peak Doog for me
20%
ThomasFremontUWhuskytskeetGladstoneExtraChrisBbiak1phineasdoogvillebackthepack 8 votes
1916 - Dobie hasn't lost a game yet
2%
jhfstyle24 1 vote
1991 - You had all the confidence in Billy Joe Camaro
15%
RaceBannonFire_Marshall_BillPurpleBazeNeGgaPlEaSeLebamDawgtheknowledge 6 votes
1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
12%
whlinderdncdrogginsTequillaYellowSnow 5 votes
2000 - Tui's senior year
5%
SpoonieLuvMuttzen 2 votes
1984
0%
2013 - Shinny new stadium and Sark is going to break through the 7 win barrier
10%
PurpleJ79smoothdawgjarlsbergraygunBread 4 votes
1997 - Preseason rankings bull shit
5%
CFetters_Nacho_LoverAtomicDawg 2 votes
1995 - Sanctions over / Purple Helmets in
0%
Write - in option
28%
TierbsHsotBoobsRoadDawg55DeepSeaZDennis_DeYoungoregonblitzkriegEwaDawghuskyhooliganFremontTrollMiley_CyrusBearsWiinFireCohen 11 votes
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club
    edited April 2017
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    For me it's pretty much a toss up between '92 and 2017. In' 92 I was still a young fan and didn't know shit about college football, but I had just moved to a new high school and was popping off big time to all my classmates who liked other teams (didn't live in WA then). 2017 is different in that it's the first season for us during the message board age where we should have justified high expectations.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,081 Founders Club
    1991 - You had all the confidence in Billy Joe Camaro
    dnc said:

    If you were around as a UW fan in 1991 you dooged harder than ever in offseason 92.

    Simple fact.

    Disagree

    1990 was such a heartbreak that we knew Stan and the boys would not fuck up 1991. After 1991 Stan was gone, Brunell was healthy and the odds of repeating were not good. From game 1 they were not the same dominant team
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Write - in option
    Offseason 2001 was prime dooging. Great recruiting class, things were looking up!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,081 Founders Club
    1991 - You had all the confidence in Billy Joe Camaro
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Offseason 2001 was prime dooging. Great recruiting class, things were looking up!

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Offseason 2001 was prime dooging. Great recruiting class, things were looking up!

    This is number two for me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    RaceBannon said:

    dnc said:

    If you were around as a UW fan in 1991 you dooged harder than ever in offseason 92.

    Simple fact.

    Disagree

    1990 was such a heartbreak that we knew Stan and the boys would not fuck up 1991. After 1991 Stan was gone, Brunell was healthy and the odds of repeating were not good. From game 1 they were not the same dominant team
    1991 was high for me but I had no idea if Hobert would be any good. I thought we'd never lose another game after 91.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    RaceBannon said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Offseason 2001 was prime dooging. Great recruiting class, things were looking up!

    image
    2001 never felt IMHO at the time like we were truly back and going to sustain a high level of success. Yeah, we almost ran the table the year before, but we didn't dominate a lot of games like we had in other great seasons.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    YellowSnow said:

    RaceBannon said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    Offseason 2001 was prime dooging. Great recruiting class, things were looking up!

    image
    2001 never felt IMHO at the time like we were truly back and going to sustain a high level of success. Yeah, we almost ran the table the year before, but we didn't dominate a lot of games like we had in other great seasons.
    Nope but we kilt it in recruiting that offseason. RW, ET, Paus, the three alleged JuCo 5 stars, Donny Best Recruiting Photo Ever Mataeki. We were BACK in recruiting and that meant we were going to be BACK on the field. Or so young doogncarolina thought.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    2013 - Shinny new stadium and Sark is going to break through the 7 win barrier
    Sark will win a Rose Bowl at USC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bread
    Bread Member Posts: 4,075
    2013 - Shinny new stadium and Sark is going to break through the 7 win barrier
    2013. Our team couldve been so good with a real coach. + 4 amazing freshman wrs and dane crane committed!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    Also *When
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,081 Founders Club
    1991 - You had all the confidence in Billy Joe Camaro
    dnc said:

    RaceBannon said:

    dnc said:

    If you were around as a UW fan in 1991 you dooged harder than ever in offseason 92.

    Simple fact.

    Disagree

    1990 was such a heartbreak that we knew Stan and the boys would not fuck up 1991. After 1991 Stan was gone, Brunell was healthy and the odds of repeating were not good. From game 1 they were not the same dominant team
    1991 was high for me but I had no idea if Hobert would be any good. I thought we'd never lose another game after 91.
    I was smoking a fresh bowl watching Billy Joe lead Puyallup to the state championship when @Swaye appeared to me in a vision and said Billy Joe would lead UW to the national championship.

    When Brunell got hurt the final piece was in place. I always believed in BJ. Best QB ever
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,336
    edited April 2017
    Write - in option
    Not sure if this was a mistake but post '85 Orange Bowl (1985 offseason), AFTER the 1984 season, was my peak doog.

    Not sure why anyone would think the 1983 season would lead to a special 1984 season. If I recall - we lost a mediocre bowel to a teen boy ass raper school.

    If you don't use consistent methodology throughout - this is an invalid pole.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    dnc said:

    RaceBannon said:

    dnc said:

    If you were around as a UW fan in 1991 you dooged harder than ever in offseason 92.

    Simple fact.

    Disagree

    1990 was such a heartbreak that we knew Stan and the boys would not fuck up 1991. After 1991 Stan was gone, Brunell was healthy and the odds of repeating were not good. From game 1 they were not the same dominant team
    1991 was high for me but I had no idea if Hobert would be any good. I thought we'd never lose another game after 91.
    My exact thoughts

    Teq Deep Thoughts: I got grounded after the Arizona loss in '92 because I couldn't believe that we lost and was busy cussing up a storm ... things you aren't supposed to do at the age I was at the time
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    EwaDawg said:

    Not sure if this was a mistake but post '85 Orange Bowl (1985 offseason), AFTER the 1984 season, was my peak doog.

    Not sure why anyone would think the 1983 season would lead to a special 1984 season. If I recall - we lost a mediocre bowel to a teen boy ass raper school.

    If you don't use consistent methodology throughout - this is an invalid pole.

    My intent was the off season before '84. Seems like many of us here - me included - weren't old enough to remember what was going on in the 80's or earlier with Husky Football, so anything I put before 90-91 should be considered suspect and invalid polling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,317 Founders Club
    1992 - Win .5 NT and Pop Off
    CuntWaffle said:

    2014 - I still can't believe Haden hired Sark to replace Kiffin and we got Petersen. Unreal.

    Praise be unto our patron saint and savior! If Pete ever wins a NT here, Cohen needs to build the Haden the Redeemer statue.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    CuntWaffle said:

    2014 - I still can't believe Haden hired Sark to replace Kiffin and we got Petersen. Unreal.

    Yeah, that's probably mine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,336
    edited April 2017
    Write - in option
    YellowSnow said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Not sure if this was a mistake but post '85 Orange Bowl (1985 offseason), AFTER the 1984 season, was my peak doog.

    Not sure why anyone would think the 1983 season would lead to a special 1984 season. If I recall - we lost a mediocre bowel to a teen boy ass raper school.

    If you don't use consistent methodology throughout - this is an invalid pole.

    My intent was the off season before '84. Seems like many of us here - me included - weren't old enough to remember what was going on in the 80's or earlier with Husky Football, so anything I put before 90-91 should be considered suspect and invalid polling.
    Thanks for clearing that up. My bad.

    I was looking for a post '84 option and didn't see one. Really, having lived through 1983 - I had expectations for a mediocre 1984. I certainly didn't forsee a three game improvement and finishing the year as the best team in the cuntry. Polls be damned.

    But OTOH, the '84 season did leave me hopeful for '85.

    (That loss to JoPa and Pedophile state was a tough one to swallow.)

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter