Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump on Syria

2

Comments

  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,462 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    pawz said:

    So Ron Paul was there?

    This why you picked that loser Hondo to ride or die with. Incapable of thinking 3 moves ahead.

    Assad watches his neighbor get buttfucked by the good Ole USofA merely on the suspicion of chemical/biological weapons.

    So he has WHAT to gain by using actual weapons? He knows winter is coming if he does.


    Russia's excuse for the attack is flimsy as shit. But it just doesn't make sense why Assad would invite the free world to his front door.

    If RFK Jr is to be believed (Why Arabs Don't Trust America), it's much more likely to be orchestrated by an agent of the west.

    Lest we forget, the CIA has a long history of regime changes to meet dubious ends.





    Please to be removing Hondo's balls from your chin. You're better than this.
    @Chemtrails @JetFuelCantMeltSteelBeams @MercuryInVaccinesMadeMyKidAutistic POTW
    TYFYS
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    salemcoog said:

    As bad as Obama's policy was on Syria, Trump has somehow managed to descend further toward oblivion. Bombing the mosque in Aleppo when you need to support of the people to put the country back together, and then pussing out when Assad gasses civilians are the acts of an president that's in over his head.

    We're busy dealing with the nightmare in N Korea that Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, and Eisenhower didn't have the balls to deal with.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    image
    Marmalard Kushner is on the job. What that job is, is anyone's guess.

    Deserves own picture thread
  • Intersectional_Dawg
    Intersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524
    Somewhere Mike Dukakis is laughing his ass off.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,462 Founders Club

    pawz said:

    So Ron Paul was there?

    This why you picked that loser Hondo to ride or die with. Incapable of thinking 3 moves ahead.

    Assad watches his neighbor get buttfucked by the good Ole USofA merely on the suspicion of chemical/biological weapons.

    So he has WHAT to gain by using actual weapons? He knows winter is coming if he does.


    Russia's excuse for the attack is flimsy as shit. But it just doesn't make sense why Assad would invite the free world to his front door.

    If RFK Jr is to be believed (Why Arabs Don't Trust America), it's much more likely to be orchestrated by an agent of the west.

    Lest we forget, the CIA has a long history of regime changes to meet dubious ends.





    Please to be removing Hondo's balls from your chin. You're better than this.
    A false flag is possible, but Assad has gassed his people before.

    Making a definitive statement one way or the other with limited evidence is dumb.
    I'm not making a difinitive statement. I'm asking an important question.

    As always, there is a difference.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    image
    Marmalard Kushner is on the job. What that job is, is anyone's guess.

    Sweet Jesus on a pogo stick. If nobody else is geared up, you can probably ground your vest.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    pawz said:

    pawz said:

    So Ron Paul was there?

    This why you picked that loser Hondo to ride or die with. Incapable of thinking 3 moves ahead.

    Assad watches his neighbor get buttfucked by the good Ole USofA merely on the suspicion of chemical/biological weapons.

    So he has WHAT to gain by using actual weapons? He knows winter is coming if he does.


    Russia's excuse for the attack is flimsy as shit. But it just doesn't make sense why Assad would invite the free world to his front door.

    If RFK Jr is to be believed (Why Arabs Don't Trust America), it's much more likely to be orchestrated by an agent of the west.

    Lest we forget, the CIA has a long history of regime changes to meet dubious ends.





    Please to be removing Hondo's balls from your chin. You're better than this.
    A false flag is possible, but Assad has gassed his people before.

    Making a definitive statement one way or the other with limited evidence is dumb.
    I'm not making a difinitive statement. I'm asking an important question.

    As always, there is a difference.
    Your question is absolutely legitimate.

    Now read the thread again.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    AZDuck said:

    image
    Marmalard Kushner is on the job. What that job is, is anyone's guess.

    Sweet Jesus on a pogo stick. If nobody else is geared up, you can probably ground your vest.
    I laffed.
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    You should change to @Comrade61 if you are going to regurgitate Russian talking points.
  • Intersectional_Dawg
    Intersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524
    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Assad represents maybe 20-30% of the country.

    But still, huh?
  • RedRocket
    RedRocket Member Posts: 1,527

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    You should change to @Comrade61 @blows61comrades if you are going to regurgitate Russian talking points.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,073
    edited April 2017
    Trump is going to divide up Syria and let Russia keep their naval base. Then he and Putin are going to go Rambo/Red Dawn/Three Kings and wipe ISIS clean. Then they may agree on a joint-venture in overthrowing Saudi Arabia in return.

    He's got a fucking oil guy as his Secretary of State. It's all about the oil. Kicking it back to when the British and the Dutch controlled the petrol. Russia gets half, the US gets half.

    He's also going to also cut a trade deal with China and they'll take care of the Korean problem.

    Then Russia and the US will fuck China on the price of oil.

    Deal makers make deals.

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Missiles fired into syria. The retarded war you've all been clamoring for begins
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    dhdawg said:

    Missiles fired into syria. The retarded war you've all been clamoring for begins

    Helps Kushner IMO.

    50 Tomahawks inbound.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Hillary may have done the same thing. But I hope all of you who thought of trump as a vote against war feel like idiots
  • Intersectional_Dawg
    Intersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524

    You can't assign reasonable motives to despots or terrorists. Just because it doesn't make sense for Assad doesn't mean he wouldn't do it. Saddam gassed the Kurds as we? were on the runway going home after kicking his ass. That didn't make sense.

    For a despot power is all that matters and keeping it isn't a matter of international praise, its a matter of cowing the population.

    It is also plausible for ISIS to do it.

    And speaking of N Korea and Saddam, let's not go to war unless we are in it to win it. And to do that we become war criminals. So no war.

    Winning the battle is never the problem, we can access any battle space and defeat any army. It's winning the peace afterwards that we haven't done since Germany.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,073
    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

    I prefer criminals to jihadists. Syria is a failed state the second assad goes
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    dhdawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

    I prefer criminals to jihadists. Syria is a failed state the second assad goes
    It's not a failed state already?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,073
    dhdawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

    I prefer criminals to jihadists. Syria is a failed state the second assad goes
    Jesus. Abundance, motherfucker. Syria has been a failed state for decades.

    Take them both out.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

    I prefer criminals to jihadists. Syria is a failed state the second assad goes
    It's not a failed state already?
    Yes. It is. But it will be infinitely worse
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Of course this attack came without congressional authorization. But what does at this point ?
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Rand and Mike lee both publically calling out the lack of congressional approval