Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Trump on Syria

123468

Comments

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Hillary may have done the same thing. But I hope all of you who thought of trump as a vote against war feel like idiots
  • Intersectional_Dawg
    Intersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524

    You can't assign reasonable motives to despots or terrorists. Just because it doesn't make sense for Assad doesn't mean he wouldn't do it. Saddam gassed the Kurds as we? were on the runway going home after kicking his ass. That didn't make sense.

    For a despot power is all that matters and keeping it isn't a matter of international praise, its a matter of cowing the population.

    It is also plausible for ISIS to do it.

    And speaking of N Korea and Saddam, let's not go to war unless we are in it to win it. And to do that we become war criminals. So no war.

    Winning the battle is never the problem, we can access any battle space and defeat any army. It's winning the peace afterwards that we haven't done since Germany.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,496 Standard Supporter
    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

    I prefer criminals to jihadists. Syria is a failed state the second assad goes
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    dhdawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

    I prefer criminals to jihadists. Syria is a failed state the second assad goes
    It's not a failed state already?
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,496 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

    I prefer criminals to jihadists. Syria is a failed state the second assad goes
    Jesus. Abundance, motherfucker. Syria has been a failed state for decades.

    Take them both out.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    dhdawg said:

    Dude61 said:

    And yeah, it pisses me off when some tinpot dictator uses chemical weapons (banned for how many years?) on his own people, and the American regime has to be cajoled into condemning it. It pissed me off when Obama threw it to the house, and it's currently pissing me off that Trump would rather golf than face reality.

    Who benefits from an alleged chemical attack? Is it Assad? Two days prior to the attack, the Trump administration said the long term status of Assad will be decided by the Syrian people. McCain goes insane over the comment. Apparently McCain does not like it when the people get to decide who will lead their country. Two days later we have an alleged sarin attack with no real proof of who carried out the deed. Immediately calls are made for Assad to be removed.
    Criminals get treated like criminals. Assad.ass.out.

    He overplayed his hand in getting in a dick measuring contest with the US. Dumb move.

    Putin got a courtesy call and Trump let it fly.

    Assad has been involved in chemical attacks since Obama drew his line in the sand...and then another and then another.

    60 missiles ain't shit. The head Donald in charge could have dropped 600 if he wanted to.

    I prefer criminals to jihadists. Syria is a failed state the second assad goes
    It's not a failed state already?
    Yes. It is. But it will be infinitely worse
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Of course this attack came without congressional authorization. But what does at this point ?
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Rand and Mike lee both publically calling out the lack of congressional approval